Disclaimer: Nothing within this page or on this site overall is the product of Panagiotis Kondylis's thought and work unless it is a faithful translation of something Kondylis wrote. Any conclusions drawn from something not written by Panagiotis Kondylis (in the form of an accurate translation) cannot constitute the basis for any valid judgement or appreciation of Kondylis and his work. (This disclaimer also applies, mutatis mutandis, to any other authors and thinkers linked or otherwise referred to, on and within all of this website).
EVERYBODY MUST OBEY, ABIDE BY AND FOLLOW THE LAW
ALL KILLINGS AND CAUSING OF DEATH AND INJURY TO INNOCENT
NON-COMBATANTS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD ARE CONDEMNED
A POSTERIORI AND A PRIORI, REGARDLESS OF WHO THE VICTIMS ARE
If you read stuff written by the ABSOLUTELY CRAZED CONTINUALLY SELF-LOBOTOMISING ULTRA-LOONY MAD SATIRICAL LITERARY PERSONA (born c. 599, 699, 799, 899 or 999 A.D. in Hellenic Eastern Rome) WITHOUT HAVING READ AND STUDIED AND UNDERSTOOD ALL OF P.K.'s CORE TEXTS FIRST (AND AT THE RATE I'M CURRENTLY GOING, THAT WON'T BE POSSIBLE (UNLESS YOU KNOW GERMAN OR GREEK) BEFORE c. 2052 IF I MAKE IT THAT FAR IN AN ABLE-BODIED STATE (HIGHLY UNLIKELY, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE)), THEN YOU ARE DOING WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD NOT TO DO, AND YOU ARE BEING RATHER NAUGHTY - TO SAY THE LEAST. I FIND, THOUGH, THAT NO-ONE EVER LISTENS TO ME, SO THEREFORE, I MUST BE WRONG. I MUST BE
NO POLITICAL-IDEOLOGICAL COURSE OF ACTION IS BEING SUPPORTED OR OTHERWISE SUGGESTED BY THIS SITE EVER (THE SITE'S SATIRICAL-LITERARY PERSONA IS LITERALLY CRAZED CRAZY LOONY MAD) UNLESS IT IS SOMETHING P.K. WROTE IN REGARD TO THE 1% OF HIS OEUVRE CONCERNING GREECE'S "FATE" AND WHETHER SHE WANTS TO SURVIVE OR NOT (OBVIOUSLY SHE DOES NOT).
THE LITERARY-SATIRICAL
PERSONA COMMENTING ON THIS PAGE AND THROUGHOUT THIS SITE IS INSANE. NO WRITER,
THINKER OR AUTHOR REFERRED TO HERE HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH ANY KIND OF
DISCRIMINATION, BIGOTRY, RACISM OR CHAUVINISM WHATSOEVER. EVERY THINKER IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN - AND ONLY FOR THEIR OWN - WORDS. THE PERSONA
COMMENTING ON THIS PAGE AND THROUGHOUT THIS SITE WAS BORN BETWEEN 599A.D. AND
999A.D. AND HAS GONE TOTALLY INSANE. DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO HIS COMMENTS.
THINK, AND WORK "IT" OUT, FOR YOURSELVES.
THE RELIEF-RELEASE VALVE IS STILL WORKING.
Βαλβίς, Entlastung.
MAKE SURE YOU BUY AND STUDY VERY CAREFULLY THIS EXCEPTIONAL (TO BE HONEST, FUCKING RELATIVELY BRILLIANT) BOOK BY THE LATE PETER FURTH IN TANDEM WITH P.K.’s
1) Der Niedergang der bürgerlichen Denk- und Lebensform: Die liberale Moderne und die massendemokratische Postmoderne
AND
2) Planetarische Politik nach dem Kalten Krieg
(translated into English at www.panagiotiskondylis.com (see link to page above))
AND
3) Das Politische im 20. Jahrhundert
(translated into English at www.panagiotiskondylis.com (see link to page above))
(AND FOR ADVANCED “KNOWERS” OF THE P.K. OEUVRE (IF ANY) ...
4) KONSERVATIVISMUS
and then all of P.K.’s other works, because all of P.K.’s texts are inter-related (some more, some less, depending on the focus of attention etc.))
Peter Furth
Massendemokratie
Über den historischen Kompromiß
zwischen Liberalismus
und Sozialismus als Herrschaftsform
Mit einem Vorwort von Frank Böckelmann
PETER FURTH
MASSENDEMOKRATIE (= Mass democracy)
Über den historischen Kompromiß zwischen Liberalismu s und Sozialismus als Herrschaftsform (= Regarding the historical compromise between liberalism and socialism as a form of domination (dominance, dominant authority, authorty, rule, ruling over others))
Vier Aufsätze (= Four essays)
Mit einer Einleitung von Frank Böckelmann (= With an introduction by Frank Böckelmann)
Berlin 2015
LANDT
Zum Gedächtnis an Panajotis Kondylis
(= In the memory of P.K. = P. K., In Memoriam)
(1943-1998)
INHALT (CONTENTS)
Die Massendemokratie im Denken Peter Furths
Einleitung von Frank Böckelmann (Mass democracy in Peter Furth’s thought. An introduction by Frank Böckelmann) – 9
Über Massendemokratie (Regarding mass democracy) (I)
Ihre Lage bei Panajotis Kondylis (It’s (i.e. Mass democracy’s) position in Panagiotis Kondylis) – 49
Kategorielles zur Political Correctness (Categorical judgements [[not tolerating any contradiction]] regarding political correctness) – 77
Massenmedien (Mass media)
Eine Revue (A review) – 105
Über Massendemokratie (Regarding mass democracy) (II)
In Erinnerung an Panajotis Kondylis (In memory of Panagiotis Kondylis) – 143
Nachweise (Proof/evidence/validation/verification) – 195
REPEAT NOTICE: THESE “NOTES” CONSTITUTE WHAT THE CRAZY MAN (MADMAN) OF THIS SITE INTERPRETS WHEN HE READS THE TEXTS OF THIS BOOK. YOU MUST READ THE ACTUAL WORDS AND TEXT(S) OF FRANK BÖCKELMANN OR PETER FURTH, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN ORDER TO KNOW WHAT THEY HAVE WRITTEN. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, MUST THESE CRAZY-MADMAN NOTES BE TAKEN TO REPRESENT SOMETHING FRANK BÖCKELMANN OR PETER FURTH HAVE WRITTEN OR INTENDED TO MEAN!!!
S. 9-10 Furth was the target of FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-USA INSANE LOONY-FARM “ANTI-FA” TYPES. Furth had extensive training in JOO-Adorno-inspired “Critical Theory”, and under the influence of Hans-Joachim Lieber, eschewed doctrinaire Marxism-Leninism, in favour of a more “Western” Marxism.
S. 10 Furth as sympathetic to the DDR, Soviet Union in the 1960s as an alternative to ZIO-USA society, and supervised in the 1970s, the doctoral thesis of Rudi Dutschke (who the FUCK is that? ANSWER: one of the many FRUIT LOOPS of the 1960s “student movement/NEW LEFT/Marching through the Institutions” and all the rest of that GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ZIO-AND-OTHER-BULLSHIT).
S. 11 By the 1990s, Furth was talking openly to people on the “Right” such as Bernd Rabehl and Horst Mahler (WHO THE FUCK ARE THEY? Apparently, both swung from “Extreme Left” to “Extreme Right” positions in the course of their “thought”, with Mahler doing many years of prison time for ZIOCAUST-ZIOCOST denial ... he was stupid, he shouldn’t have denied it, WHO GIVES A FUCK IF 600,000,000 JOOS DIE, LET ALONE JUST SIX MILLION (EVEN THOUGH HOBSBAWM/JOOBAWM IN THE AGE OF EXTREMES PREFERRED A 5.1 OR 5.2 MILLION NUMBER (I CAN’T REMEMBER NOW WHICH, AND I CAN’T BE FUCKED LOOKING IT UP. WHO GIVES A FUCK?)) GIVEN THAT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF ORTHODOX AND OTHER CHRISTIANS AND THEIR DESCENDANTS AND CHINAMEN AND OTHERS DIED IN THE 20TH CENTURY INCLUDING GREEKS (HELLENES, ROMANS) AND OUR ORTHODOX RUSSIAN BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND SERBS AND ARMENIANS ET AL. ... ) ...
S. 11-12 Furth never stopped professing Marxism/materialism, but by the 1980s was working on a “conservative defence of Marxism” and saw that Habermas was FULL OF IDEOLOGICAL SHIT, in talking “communication” without – so to speak – taking into account the full array of material conditions and circumstances. FUCK, IT’S UNBELIEVABLE THAT HABERMAS IS NOT ANOTHER JOO, BECOZ HE IS SO MUCH LIKE A STANDARD RIDICULOUS JOO-FREAK-RETARD WITH “HIGH VERBAL IQ”.
S. 13 Furth knew there would always be conflict and war, and that only LOONIES AND ASSORTED FRUIT LOOPS INCL. RIDICULOUS JOOs preached a Religion of “Tolerance” (SO THEY COULD HIDE THEIR GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ACCUMULATIONS, CONCENTRATIONS AND CRYSTAL(LISATION)S OF FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH IN CERTAIN COUNTRIES INCL. THROUGH PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY NETWORKING AND FOR CONCRETE HISTORICAL REASONS REGARDING INTERNATIONAL BANKING, INTERNATIONAL TRADE, HIGH FINANCE, CORPORATIONS ETC..)
S. 14-15 So, the 1968ers ended being co-opted by the “system” of mass production and mass consumption since everything “private” was to become an out-in-the-open exchangeable and or saleable commodity.
S. 15 So, in Germany we have a “fun society and guilty community” (Günter Zehm) which is unprecedented in world history [[WHO THE FUCK IS THIS FUCKING HUN-KRAUT-TEUTON, GÜNTER ZEHM? ANSWER: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Günter_Zehm = Günter Albrecht Zehm (12. Oktober 1933 in Crimmitschau) ist ein deutscher Publizist, politisch Verfolgter in der DDR und Philosoph. Seit 1993 ist er Honorarprofessor für Philosophie an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität in Jena. Zehm war Mitarbeiter der Tageszeitung Die Welt. Seit 1995 ist er Kolumnist der rechtsgerichteten Wochenzeitung Junge Freiheit. = Another “Right-Winger”, but once “communist”. Zehm has this EXCELLENT QUOTE AND IT’S SO TRUE UNDER CONDITIONS OF ZIO-USA AND ENFORCED AND OR BRAIN-WASHED-LOBOTOMISING ZIOCOST/ZIOCAUST WORSHIP (WHEN MORE THAN 250 MILLION INNOCENT PEOPLE DIED IN THE 20TH CENTURY, INCLUDING TENS AND TENS AND TENS OF MILLIONS OF ORTHODOX AND OTHER CHRISTIANS AND WHITE ATHEISTS, INCLUDING SO MANY GREEKS, HELLENES, ROMANS, RUSSIANS, SERBS, ARMENIANS ET AL. – UNBELIEVABLE FUCKING STUFF ... AND WHAT DO WE GET? GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE OVER-REPRESENTATION AND OVER-PROJECTION OF ZIO-JOO-EXCREMENT SUFFERING WHILST OUR ANCESTORS ARE FORGOTTEN IN ORGIES OF SELF-HATE AND ZIO-WORSHIP UNDER THE FREAKISH AND HYPER-RACIST, ULTRA-HATE VOMIT DISGUSTING ZIO-EXCREMENT FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMY CONDITIONS OF ZIO-USA ... THE HORROR, THE HORROR, THE HORROR, OF THE JOO AND ZIO-SATANIST ... ABSOLUTELY FILTHY AND DISGUSTING ANIMALS ... AS IF YOUR ANCESTORS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN MY ANCESTORS, YOU FUCKING DISGUSTING ANIMALS ... ) ... (THE GOOGLE TRANSLATION IS UNDERSTANDABLE, SO YOU CAN COPY AND PASTE INTO YOUR JOOGLE TRANSLATOR:
„Der Holocaust ist an die Stelle Gottes getreten. Über ‚das hohe C‘ im Namen von Parteien darf man spotten, aber an den Holocaust muß man glauben; wer Zweifel erkennen läßt, verschwindet hinter Gittern. Nicht viel anders steht es mit Multikulti. Das Vaterland, die Polis, darf nach Belieben verhöhnt werden; wer Multikulti ablehnt, wer Zuwanderung begrenzen oder Sozialhilfe für ‚Asylanten‘ kürzen will, der outet sich als ‚Rassist‘, und das ist fast so schlimm wie ‚Verharmloser des Holocaust‘.“
SO, WHAT WE HAVE IS NOTHING BUT OUTRIGHT AUTO-GENOCIDAL, SELF-DENYING, ANCESTOR-FORGETTING ZIO-SATANISM ...
THE HORROR, THE HORROR, THE HORROR ...
FOR THESE ARE THE ZIO-SATANISTS, THESE ARE THE ANIMALS FROM HELL ...
S. 16-17 Furth is compared to some of his more famous but up to JOO-Ridiculous contemporaries such as Marcuse (= ZIO-HEDONISMUS-KONSUM-CLOWN), Wolfagang Abendroth (Who the Fuck is THAT? ANSWER: An East German who became a West German and Supervised the Communication ZIO-LIKE-LOONIE, Habermas, who thinks The Enlightenment and Liberalism are REAL today and can “be saved” HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! = THEY ARE ALL ABSOLUTELY FUCKING INSANE!!!), Karl-Otto Apel (WHO THE FUCK IS THAT? ANSWER: PROBABLY A LOONY PUSHING BULLDUST LIKE “TRANSCENDENTAL PRAGMATICS”, AND HAVING COLLABORATED WITH ARCH-COMMUNICATION-LUNATIC HABERMAS), Odo Marquard (WHO THE FUCK IS THAT? ANSWER: SOMEONE WHO SEEMS TO BE A LITTLE LESS OF A FRUIT-LOOP THAN HABERMAS AND FRIENDS), and of course the Loopy-LoonY-TOTAL-COMMUNICATION FRUIT LOOP Habermas (I have nothing personal against him and I hope his final years (now current) are pleasant, which is something I wish ALL (VERY) OLD PEOPLE REGARDLESS OF RACE, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUALITY, BELIEFS ETC.).
S. 18 THE GREAT Alexis de Tocqueville already in 1835 SAW that the “equality” of “democracy” would become an end-in-itself ... BUT THE ISSUE IS THAT IT WOULD BECOME AN IDEOLOGICAL END-IN-ITSELF SO THAT VARIOUS GROUPS COULD OBTAIN “WITHOUT BEING NOTICED” GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH ...
SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY...
SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY...
SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY...
S. 18-19 Now, the Introduction makes (or implies, ... I’m adding STUFF ...) the very important point – notwithstanding that Western mass democracies achieved, in general, higher standards of MATERIAL living etc. incl. via Konsum and Hedonismus (Multikulti Pluralismus, Toleranz, ZIOCOST WORSHIP and ASSORTED SATANIC-CIRCUS-MONKEY-APE-FREAK-HORROR-VOMIT SHOWS etc. etc. etc.), THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT those accumulating GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE forms of state and economic power do not exist (THEY DO FUCKING EXIST, ANYONE NOT ON DRUGS CAN SEE THAT) and that “human rights universalism” does not GO HAND IN HAND WITH self-deception on a mass scale = FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-USA DEEP-PSYCHO LOBOTOMISATION AND EXTENSIVE ZIO-TV-MASS MEDIA-ACADEMIA-LAW-FULL SPECTRUM-BRAIN WASHING. This process has taken various forms in various doses and has been on-going since the 18th century, with bourgeois revolutionaries fighting autocracy with the ideological weapon of “universal Reason” etc. ... (obviously, the further back in time we go – GROSSO MODO – the less is the ZIO-SATAN influence, because never forget it was the PROTESTANTS-PAPISTS-SECULARISTS-AND ASSORTED (BACK THEN) CRYPTO-COCK-SUCKERS WHO GOT THE BALL ROLLING ... ) ...
ROLL, ROLL, ROLL – A POEM
AND SO THE JOO WAS BARELY PRESENT
WHEN THE PROTESTANT-PAPIST-SECULARIST-FREEMASON
GOT THE BALL A-ROLLING ...
ROLL, ROLL, ROLL
ROLL DID THE BALL ROLL
AND SO THE BALL ROLLED A LOT
AND TO THE BALL A-ROLLING
AND TO THE CONQUESTS AND DISCOVERIES
ALREADY UNDER WAY
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION WAS ADDED
AND THEN THE WORLD WAS FUCKED
ROLL, ROLL, ROLL
ROLL DID THE BALL ROLL
AND THEN THE WORLD WAS REALLY FUCKED
(AS ROLL-SEEN-ROLL FROM A ROLL-LONG-ROLL-TERM ROLL-
POINT OF ROLL-VIEW-ROLL)
*
S. 19 The citoyens/citizens soak up the universalistic-Reason ideologies and with affluence, what eventuates is a kind of “moral next-to-dominance” i.e. a state of domination where everyone (at least the naive large part of “everyone”) feels they are “equal” etc..
S. 20 The Soviet Union obviously failed in overcoming “eternally” the “citizens/citoyens of labour”/conditions of exploitation, and, individual vs. genus/group interests quandary ... in fact no society can overcome it “eternally” ... at most there is a kind of macro-historically seen temporary compromise for a number of decades due to concrete historical, geopolitical and other social/economic circumstances ...
S. 21 After retirement in the 1990s, Furth turned his attention away from the history of bourgeois and Marxist thought and the “cultural revolution/1968” to the “mass-democratic consolidation of industrial society”, the fruits of which appear in this volume.
S. 22 The bourgeois parties and schools of thought succeed in reining in and taming the self-destructive potential of their society by means of mass democracy ending the old “great narratives”, i.e. by a historic compromise between
liberalism
and
socialism
(in order to set up a new Multi-Kulti Satanic Circus Monkey ZIOCOST “Grand Narrative” where traditional indigenous European Religion is replaced by Hedonistic Consumption and Worship of the ZIO-SATANIC-CIRCUS-MONKEY-FREAK-SHOW ... un-ba-fucking-un-believable STUFF!!! (which of course “just happens” HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just like ZIO-USA “JUST HAPPENED” AAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
S. 22-23
NOW THIS IS VERY SERIOUS AND IMPORTANT SHIT AND GOES TO THE CRUX OF MATTERS, DUMB FUCKING IMBECILES, FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISED DUMB FUCKING IDIOTS ...
In effect the two great Wings of bourgeois ideology and or practice, liberalism and socialism, under conditions of mass democracy, became agents of big business (read: GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY, ZIO-JOO CORPORATIONS AND GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY, ZIO-JOO FINANCE ETC.). Mass production and mass consumption meet the demands of the disadvantaged classes in a way that is both real and deceptive. According to Furth, this development leads to a “new social formation”, marking the transition from bourgeois modernism to a postmodernism / mass democracy.
[[CRAZY MAN ADDS: THE REALITY IS THAT “POST-MODERNISM” GOES BACK TO c. 1900 AT THE DAWN OF MASS DEMOCRACY, BUT MOST CONFUSE IT ONLY WITH THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION OF THE 1960s AND 1970s WHEN IT BECAME A TOTALISING PHENOMENON, RATHER THAN A STILL MINORITY PHENOMENON IN ITS EARLY STAGES ... SEE P.K. DECLINE ...]]
S. 23-24
Furth obviously made extensive use of P.K.’s Decline ... with a particular emphasis being placed on mass democracy’s intense and far-reaching division of labor within conditions of societal massification and atomisation and the breaking off and detachment of individuals from any substance-based or supra-individual commitment [[in the traditional sense]] in favor of unlimited flexibility, mobility ... with the old collectives of class and folk and nation becoming relatively lame or fluid since “everyone” is a kind of hedonistic consumer who goes on exotic holidays and takes drugs etc. etc. etc..
S. 24 AND KEY TO ALL OF THIS IS THE OVERCOMING OF THE SCARCITY AND DEARTH OF GOODS ... = MAIN CULTURAL FEATURE OF ZIO-USA (BUILT UPON ZIO-GREAT BRITAIN/ZIO-FRANCE AND THE MASS SUPER-EXPLOITATION OF TENS AND TENS AND TENS OF MILLIONS OF WHITE PEASANTS AND PROLETARIANS IN THE 18TH TO MID 20TH CENTURIES AND ESPECIALLY FROM THE 19TH CENTURY UNTIL TODAY OF ASIANS, NEGROs AND OTHER COOLIES AND CHEAP LABOUR ... ) ...
S. 25 Proletarians become consumers AND in the wake of mass production and consumption, “normative attitudes related to scarcity and concern/worry, such as asceticism, discipline, sublimation” lose their inner necessity and, with that, their name and reputation.
S. 25-26 Furth looks at mass democracy’s handling of the “contrast and opposition between accumulation and distribution” and “decision and legitimation” which mass democracy hitherto has been able to resolve in various ways which change as to time and place and concrete circumstances, etc..
S. 26-27 And of course there are all the associated one-world phantasies and other forms of DEEP-BRAIN-WASHED-BRAIN-DEAD-TISSUE ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION involving “racism” etc. when host nations are in EXTREME RACIST FASHION COMMITTING MASS AUTO-RACISM TO THEMSELVES AND THINK THAT BEING RACIST IS ONLY AS JOOS DEFINE IT WHEN ISRAEL HAS A CLEAR ZIO-ORIENTATION AND PURPOSE. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY SICK STUFF AND ONLY ZIO-EXCREMENT AND THEIR ALLIES COULD POSSIBLY PUSH SUCH GARBAGE, AND ONLY ZOMBIES WHO HAVE BEEN FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISED COULD POSSIBLY BELIEVE SUCH NONSENSE. I DON’T SEE THE CHINESE OR THE JAPANESE OR THE VIETNAMESE OR THE KOREAN OR THE SOUTH AFRICAN STATES AND PEOPLES BELIEVING THE ZIO-INANITIES ... IT’S JUST PROMINENT IN FORMERLY CHRISTIAN AND FORMERLY WHITE COUNTRIES, DECIMATED BY TWO WORLD WARS AND DRUGGED UP AND ZOMBIFIED BY ALL THE HEDONISTIC MASS GARBAGE ZIO CONSUMPTION .... = ZIO-USA VICTORY IN WW2 ...
S. 27-28 In no Western mass democracies do the people actually rule. What happens is that elites rule, and whilst new members of the elites are welcome, we all know who GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY is involved in elite-level rule.
S. 28 SO WHAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE are leaders and lobbyists, financial markets and corporations and the Rhetoric-TOTAL BULLISHIT about “humanity”, “freedom”, “social justice”, “peace”, “popular rule” and POP GOES THE WEASEL “tolerance” ... YEA SURE, BEING TOLERANT OF AUTO-GENOCIDING YOURSELF OUT OF EXISTENCE ... GOOD ONE ...
ALL OF THIS FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-USA IDEOLOGICAL GARBAGE IS PRESENTED BY TV/MASS-MEDIA AS “SELF-EVIDENT” MORALITY ...
S. 29 However, since the conceptuality of the bourgeois Enlightenment has shaken off its totalitarian competition and rival (i.e. fascism and communism), its own totalitarian side emerges more and more.
S. 29-30 AND “HUMANITY” BECOMES AN ALL-INCLUSIVE CONCEPT INTERPRETED ONLY IN ONE WAY, STIGMATISING ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION.
PAX AMERICANA AND “HUMANITARIAN DISCRIMINATION” ...
SO, ALL THE INSANITY ABOUT “HUMANITY” AND “TOLERANCE”, “DIE-VERSITY” AND “COSMOPOLITANISM” CALL FOR AN “ABSOLUTE FOE” HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!! = ANYTHING WHICH DOES NOT AGREE WITH GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ZIO FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH UNDER ZIO-USA ... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JUST WAIT FOR HAN MAN AND FOR APE MAN TO YELL OUT LOUD AND DO AS A MATTER OF PRACTICE
THE BIG
“FUCK YOU!!!”
S. 32 Under the ZIO-USA regime of FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION, KONSUM UND HEDONISMUS, pessimists with “anthropological scepticism” now assume “an intentional misanthropic program” JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE VALID DOUBTS ABOUT THE ZIO-USA CULTURE OF FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO LOBOTOMISATION BRAIN-WASHING, INDOCTRINATED ZIOCOST WORSHIP AND EXTREME ANTI-WHITE, WHITE-GENOCIDAL RACISM AND EXTREME ANTI-CHRISTIAN MALE SEXISM AND EXTREME ISLAMO-LOBOTOMISED-PHILIA, AND ON TOP OF ALL OF THAT, NEGRO-WORSHIP ... YEAH, WELL DONE, ZIO-USA, THEY ARE GREAT CONTRIBUTIONS TO “WORLD CULTURE” ... HERE, HAVE A PRIZE!!!
AND IF SOMEONE VERY RATIONALLY OPPOSES SUCH EXTREME ZIO-EXCREMENT, THEY ARE DEEMED “IRRATIONAL” AND “PARANOID” BY PSYCHO-JOOS (EVEN SMART (AND NOT YOUR TYPICAL RIDICULOUS) ONES LIKE ???? ????STEIN) WHO ARE BEYOND PSYCHO-PATHOLOGISING IN THEIR EXTREME HATE-DRIVEN ZIO-PSYCHO-FRUIT-LOOP INSANITY AND INASTIABLE ZIO-LUST FOR POWER AND CONTROL AND OF COURSE, MONEY (SINCE THEY ARE THE CHILDREN OF MAMMON AND EXCHANGE VALUE (ALONG WITH THEIR MANY PROTESTANT AND PAPIST AND ATHEIST AND COCK-SUCKING ALLIES)) ... FOR THESE ARE THE ZIO SATANISTS, THE ANIMALS (AND EXCREMENT) FROM HELL.
S. 32-33 AND OF COURSE ANY THINKING WHICH IS “CONSERVATIVE” OR “RIGHT” IS “HATE” – ONLY A TOTAL FRUIT LOOP LOONY WOULD EVER BELIEVE THAT NOT ALL PEOPLE LOVE AND HATE (OR HAVE THE CAPACITY TO DO SO) ... ABSOLUTE FUCKING ZIO-INSANITY ... AND YOU WONDER WHY YOU, SATANISTS, ARE SO HATED ALL AROUND THE WORLD, AND WHY EVENTUALLY YOU WILL GO INTO THE DEEP FRY ...
INTO THE DEEP FRY THEY WILL GO
INTO THE DEEP FRY THEY WILL GO
IT’S JUST A MATTER OF TIME
BE IT 100 YEARS OR 1000 YEARS
(BUT IT ALMOST CERTAINLY WON’T BE THE LENGTH AND
DURATION OF YEARS ONE THOUSAND) ...
INTO THE DEEP FRY THEY WILL GO
BECAUSE YOU CAN’T ACCUMULATE SUCH
GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE
FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH
AND GET AWAY WITH IT FOREVER.
IT’S JUST NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, DICKHEADS.
WHAT GOES AROUND, COMES AROUND
AND INTO THE DEEP FRY YOU WILL GO
AND SINCE MY TRIBE, THE TRIBE OF TRIBES,
POUND FOR POUND, WE WERE THE GREATEST,
IS DEAD AND BURIED
AND DEADER AND MORE BURIED THAN
DEAD AND BURIED
WE SHALL BE SINGING, CHANTING
SERVES THEM RIGHT! SERVES THEM RIGHT!
UP IN HEAVEN BELOW JESUS AND THE VIRGIN MARY
WE SHALL BE SINGING AND CHANTING
IN JOYOUS ORTHODOX CHORUS
WITH ALL OUR ORTHODOX BROTHERS AND SISTERS
SERVES THEM RIGHT! SERVES THEM RIGHT!
SERVES THEM FUCKING RIGHT!!!
DEATH TO THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY!!!
DEATH
TO
SATAN!!!!!
*
S. 34 When notions under “universal Reason” were bandied about and disseminated like “humanity”, “tolerance” and “cosmopolitanism” by the bourgeois revolutionaries especially some 200/250+ years ago when the Revolutions came relatively “thick and fast”, THERE WAS NEVER ANY NOTION THAT EVERYONE IN SOCIETY WAS EQUALLY COVERED ... AND LIKEWISE TODAY, DUMB FUCKING IMBECILES, IF ONE GROUP OF PEOPLE, E.G. JOOS/ZIO-EXCREMENT AND CUNTS (FEMINISTS) AND FAGGOTS AND BLACK PEOPLE AND MAHUMUTS, INCREASE THEIR RELATIVE POWER, THEN OTHER GROUPS SUCH AS WHITE CHRISTIAN MALES, WILL HAVE A DECREASE IN POWER. NOW, SOME KIND OF EQUILIBRIUM MIGHT BE ACHIEVED FOR A FEW DECADES AS A KIND OF “SOCIAL COMPROMISE”, BUT EVENTUALLY “THE SAME OL’ CRAP” WILL RETURN IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, BECAUSE PEOPLE BECOME PISSED OFF AND ORGANISE ... AND THIS APPLIES TO INTERNATONAL RELATIONS (MUTATIS MUTANDIS, CETERIS PARIBUS) TOO, DUMB FUCKING IMBECILES ...
S. 36 Furth saw that after bourgeois oligarchic liberalism, a new social formation had arisen, “with capitalism, but without a bourgeoisie and without a proletariat” SINCE WHAT WE HAVE ARE CONSUMERS AND WHITE COLLAR TYPES AND HEDONISTIC-FEMINO-FAGGOTISED ENTERTAINMENT-DRUG TYPES AND SOME TRADIES AND A LOT OF USELESS DOLE BLUDGERS AND JUNKIES TOO, AND NOW ALL THE INVADERS IN ORGIES OF ZIO-INSPIRED APEIFICATION ... AND JUNGLISATION ... MAMUTISATION ...
S. 37 LOOK, I DON’T AGREE WITH THE TERMINOLOGY WHEN FURTH E.G. TALKS ABOUT “post-ideological aestheticism.” ETC., BUT I’VE EXPLAINED MYSELF ELSEWHERE ABOUT THIS POINT ... THE CRUX OF THE MATTER WAS THE LATE AND VERY GOOD REAL-DEAL PROF. P. FURTH WAS ON THE RIGHT TRACK ...
S. 40 Furth adopts Sombart’s “mass individualism” ... + Furth gives us “a conformism of being the Other” (»Konformismus des Andersseins«) which I called Otherisation and Freakification and Apeification and Mammonisation and ZioNisation and SatanicCircusMonkeyCircusIsation and a whole lot of other SHIT, because I am INSANE and a PEASANT (Sancho Panza without Don Quijote) ...
S. 41 So, under Mass Democracy you get to be “free” by being “free to choose” whatever is put before you by Corporations and or the State, unless you are a bit of an eccentric, which you are allowed to be too, if you can afford it and are no serious political threat ... which is kind of, sort of “fair enough” compared to other societies ... which might be in part mass-democratic, but not consumeristic, hedonistic ... but then again, personally, because I can live very basically and very frugally, I could have lived under Stalin’s regime too if I had “official approval” ... all sorts of bourgeois culture was allowed like classical music and literature etc. ... so why not? The problem of course is if – for whatever reason – you are not left alone ...
S. 42 So, if you are a Hun Kraut Teuton in Hun Kraut Teuton Land, the more you flagellate yourself about the ZIOCOST (as if many millions of ordinary AND INNOCENT Germans did not die in the 20th century) – this is absolutely SICK STUFF – the more you build up your status as an EVIL CULPRIT, the more under ZIO-USA you can e.g. FUCK OVER PATHETIC COUNTRIES LIKE ... GRIS, AKA AS “GREECE”.
s. 46 IT’S ALL FUCKING HEADING TOWARDS MORE POLICE AND MORE MILITARY, AND MORE AUTHORITARIANISM UP TO HARD DICTATORSHIP BECAUSE THE INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION BETWEEN STATES WILL MEAN A TURNING OF THE SCREWS EVERYWHERE ... SO INSTEAD OF ZIOTOPIA WE’LL GET ZIO-EXCREMENT UNIVERSALISED ALL ROUND ... WHEN HAN MAN AND OR APE MAN GO FOR THE BIG “FUCK YOU!!!” THERE WLL BE NO FUN, THAT’S FOR SURE ...
S. 48 SO IT’S ALL HEADING TO THE SOCIAL ORDER/SOCIAL COHESION SOCIAL-ONTOLOGICAL REALITY ... »sozialen und politischen Einheit als Kampfform« = “social and political unity as a form of struggle” ...
S. 51 Furth’s “Regarding/On/About mass democracy (I)” starts with an ABSOLUTELY AMAZING quote from THE GREAT Tocqueville which includes clear references (from the 1830s!!!) to massification and atomisation, incl. the downgrading of traditional spiritual consciousness in favour of material, base vulgarity (of course, Scientific Observation as such does not judge one state of being as superior or inferior to the other, for these are ultimately subjective matters of Taste, but Tocqueville is, inter alia, not just judging THINGS/CIRCUMSTANCES, but is also describing the onset of a new social phenomenon of world-historical significance arising from massification-atomisation and the Industrial Revolution).
S. 52-53 Under conditions of mass democracy, the Enlightenment notions and normative authorities of Reason, Nature and History lose their intellectual legitimacy and synthetic force. [[OF COURSE, “REASON” AND “HISTORY” HAVE RE-SURFACED IN ZIO-USA IDEOLOGY AS EXPOUNDED BY RIDICULOUS “ANTI-RACIST” LARGELY PSYCHO-RETARDED JOO “PROFESSORS” AND THEIR ALLIES (ATTEMPTING (AND THUS FAR, SUCCEEDING) TO CONTRIBUTE TO GENOCIDE CHRISTIAN WHITES OUT OF EXISTENCE), WHO THINK THAT THE WORLD IS GOING TO CONTINUE A PATH OF NON-STOP “ECONOMIC GROWTH” AND BECOME “DEMOCRATIC” SO THAT JOOIE AND HIS ANGLO-SAXON AND GALLIC AND TEUTON-HUN-KRAUT ZIO-COCKSUCKING ALLIES CAN ALL GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY POSSESS WEALTH AND POWER. WELL, HAN MAN AND APE MAN (AND PERHAPS MY ORTHODOX BROTHER, RUS MAN – GO RUS MAN!!! (MY TRIBE IS DEAD, SO I CAN ONLY BARRACK FOR ORTHODOX BROTHER RUS MAN, THOUGH I WISH HAN MAN GOOD LUCK, AND WHITE AND BLACK AMERICAN CHRISTIANS GOOD LUCK TOO (BUT THEY HAVE TO REIN IN THEIR JOO-PSYCHO-ZIO ALLIES) ... ) ... MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY ABOUT THAT ... ]]
S. 53 And so the oligarchic structures of bourgeois society are – under mass democracy –, counterproductive, and a new type of ideological legitimation is called-for incl. the analytically combinatory thought form of the post-modern (mass democracy) instead of the synthetically harmonising thought of the modern (oligarchic bourgeois liberalism) ... mass production AND mass consumption means a transition from mass society to what is termed “mass democracy” i.e. a mass society where there is such a fine division of labour and such atomisation accompanying massification that social mobility reaches a fluidity hitherto unknown in history on a mass scale + with universal suffrage in place in most “Western” countries by c. 1900-1930/1950 ...
S. 54 the “mass” is possibly a term connoting something negative compared to the “democracy” which most view as the summum bonum of our civilisation ...
S. 56-57 The three main ideologies and political movements, with roots going back to the 18th century, liberalism, conservatism and socialism (social/radical democracy), fuse into mass democracy whilst overlapping at these points: liberalism gives a notion of the rights of man (back then, of citizen-men of property), which in socialism (social/radical democracy) takes a material character, i.e. the notion of material/goods/money/consumption rights which culminates in the social welfare state, and socialism (social/radical democracy) coincides with conservatism on the point of nationalism (because the second main phase of conservatism more or less abandoned the hope of a return to societas civilis/late feudalism and sought to keep whatever it could from the feudal privileges era and rule of God within the context of the nationalistic capitalistic liberal state (post 1789 until the end of the 19th century or WW1 at the very latest) ...
S. 57-58 mass democracy is WITH CAPITALISM, BUT WITHOUT a bourgeoisie and WITHOUT a proletariat (IN THE WEST) = a caricature of the communist ideal of a classless society AND OBVIOUSLY NOT “THE END OF HISTORY” AS A RETARDED IDEOLOGUE CLAIMING TO BE SOME KIND OF “PROFESSOR” OR “GURU” ... WOULD CONTEND (WHO LOOKS LIKE SOME KIND OF JAP, BUT ISN’T A JAP, AND IS SOMETHING FROM “THE WEST”) ... [[CRAZY MAN ADDS: IT’S BASICALLY GROSSLY DISPRPOPORTIONATELY JOOS AND THEIR PROTESTANT-PAPIST-ATHEIST-COCK-SUCKING ALLIES AND CONSUMERS ET AL. I.E. A GREAT “BIG TENT” SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ZIO-EXCREMENTAL HATE-FILLED JUDAS SATAN OTHERISING MULTI-KULTI ZIOCOST FREAK SHOW ETC. ...]]
S. 60 The notion of modern “democracy” that it is to be defined by universal suffrage, i.e. voting, is SO FUCKING RETARDED, THAT ONLY JOOS AND THEIR ALLIES (PROTESTANTS, PAPISTS, ATHEISTS AND COCK-SUCKERS) COULD EVER BELIEVE THAT ... ANYONE WHO KNOWS GREEK HISTORY KNOWS THAT DEMOCRACY HISTORICALLY HAS ALWAYS BEEN FAR MORE THAN “VOTING” ... WHICH IS SO CONVENIENT FOR JOOS AND THEIR ALLIES IN CONTROLLING THE MASS PARTIES OF GOVERNMENT AND THE MASS MEDIA GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY IN ORDER TO INFLUENCE THINGS THEIR WAY, IN PARTICULAR IN FAVOUR OF ZIO-USA (THIS DOES NOT MEAN THERE IS ANY “BETTER” ALTERNATIVE; IN FACT, FOR MOST PEOPLE, THERE MOST CERTAINLY IS NOT, BUT FACTS ARE FACTS, AND THE DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF THEM IS VERY DIFFERENT TO THE ZIO-JOO-PROTESTANT-PAPIST-ATHEIST-COCK-SUCKER LIES, PROPAGANDA AND SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY FREAK-SHOW ZIOCOST UP-ROOT, DE-ROOT MULTI-KULTI NON-STOP UNENDING EVIL SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY HATE ) ...
S. 60-61 So, what we have in our contemporary Western “democracies” is DEFINITELY NOT THE RULE OF THE PEOPLE, but a Rule of Elites which the people – for whatever reasons [[KONSUM, HEDONISMUS, DRUGS, FULL-SPECTRCUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION, MASS MEDIA, MASS ENTERTAINMENT, MASS BRAIN-WASHING, ETC.]] – tolerate.
S. 61 Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Capitalism, socialism and democracy ... KEY = THE DIVISION OF LABOUR RE: THE DIVERSIFICATION OF INTERESTS AND ELITES AND BETWEEN RULING AND GOVERNED, VOTERS AND THE ELECTED ETC. ...
S. 62 the division of labor, the atomisation of society, and social mobility = structural factors for the pushing through and implementation of mass democracy ... P.K.’s mass democracy is an overall ideal-typical concept which is contrasted to oligarchic bourgeois liberalism and societas civilis/late feudalism (and has at its extreme ends, communism and fascism/national socialism), whereas the GREAT Karl Mannheim was concerned with Anglo-Saxon “democracy” and its relative lack of unity compared with “totalising” Soviet communism, fascism and national socialism.
»Das, was Mannheim in Mensch und Gesellschaft im Zeitalter des Umbaus als »Fundamentaldemokratisierung« noch vor der vollständigen Durchsetzung sah, macht für Kondylis den festen inneren Kern der Massendemokratie aus.« (= “What Mannheim saw in Man and Society in the Age of Reconstruction as “fundamental democratisation” still before complete implementation, for Kondylis, makes up the solid, firm inner core of mass democracy.”)
S. 63 NOW YOU DUMB FUCKING RETARDS, THIS IS AN ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT SUMMARY OF THE ISSUE OF “POPULISM” AND ELITISM WHICH IS A FEATURE OF MASS DEMOCRACY RATHER THAN THE OLD OLIGARCHIC BOURGEOIS LIBERAL CLASS WAR BETWEEN THE PROLETARIAT AND THE CAPITALISTS. THE JOOGLE TRANSLATION IS BASICALLY OK AND UNDERSTANDABLE SO YOU CAN COPY AND PASTE INTO YOUR JOOGLE TRANSLATOR, AND YOU’LL BE ABLE TO GET THE GIST OF THE GERMAN TEXT ...
»Allerdings ist selbst in der Massendemokratie noch ein Rest der alten demokratischen Unruhe vorhanden, in der Sehwundform des Populismus. Zwar ist die Klassenherrschaft, die die Demokratie bis zum Zerreißen im Bürgerkrieg bedrohte, durch die Herrschaft von Leistungseliten ohne Statusrechte abgelöst, aber zur Überbrückung zwischen dem Gleichheitsprinzip und der faktischen Elitenherrschaft ist Populismus unausweichlich. Er ist dem System der Massendemokratie immanent, weil der Abstand zwischen Gleichheitsbedarf und Herrschaftsbedarf Gefahr auch noch für die simulatorischen Formen demokratischer Legitimität bedeutet. Zu ihrer Abwehr müssen populistische Anpassungen von oben nach unten stattfinden, die die Massen der »kleinen Leute« in der Massendemokratie in eine stärkere Position bringen, als sie der Kleinbürger in Massengesellschaft und liberaler Demokratie hatte. (Die populistisch umworbene »neue Mitte« wird in der Massendemokratie zum entscheidenden sozialen Segment. Sie sieht sich selber als so etwas wie die »universale Klasse«, erhaben über soziale und nationale Zurechnungen und maßgeblich für den Zumutungsgrad politischer Problemlösungen einerseits und das Qualitäts und Autoritätsniveau der »politischen Klasse« andererseits.)«
S. 64 The emphasis on Appearance = key to dealing with disenchantment in mass democracy.
S. 65 The notion of (the Appearance of) equality goes with redistribution ... Tocqueville was well aware of the inner tension between freedom and equality in democracy ...
S. 65-66 The Great Tocqueville saw in America that there was less State and more forms of Liberty ... but in Europe, because of the old social structures and revolutions etc., there was a very real danger of the State taking “equality” to the point of extreme state repression ...
S. 66 So, Tocqueville wanted safeguards re: freedom, to balance the egalitarian tendencies ...
S. 67-68 In Europe, through mass production and mass consumption post-WW2, even the lower strata of society could participate in goods consumption/pleasure etc..
S. 68 With the overcoming of the shortage and dearth of goods, normative attitudes related to scarcity and concern/worry such as asceticism, discipline, and sublimation are no longer of importance and significant. They are “thrown out”.
S. 70 »Erst wenn man die immanente Überproportionalität in der Gleichheit wahrnimmt, versteht man die weitertreibende Asymmetrie in der Dynamik der historischen Kompromisse, die letztlich in die Massendemokratie eingegangen sind.« (= “Only when one perceives the immanent OVER-proportionality i.e. disproportionality, in regard to the equality does one understand the continuing asymmetry in the dynamics of historical compromises, which have in the end come into mass democracy.”) [[HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]
S. 70-71 “Acceptance”, advertising, mass psychology, “tolerance” and Werner Sombart’s “mass individualism” ...
S. 72 »Das geschieht in einem Raum, in dem der bürgerliche Unterschied von Privatheit und Öffentlichkeit, »high and low culture«, Hoch- und Popkultur verschwimmt, also normative Ansprüche Geschmackssache sind und zudem unter das Gebot der Permissivität fallen.« (= “This happens in a space in which the bourgeois distinction/differentiation between privacy and being in the public sphere, “high and low culture”, high and pop culture blurs, i.e. normative claims are a matter of Taste, and moreover, fall under the imperative of permissiveness.”)
S. 75 »Insoweit man das Konzept Massendemokratie auf die saturierten internen Verhältnisse der westlichen Staatengesellschaft projiziert, ist die Stabilitätsfrage nur eine Frage der inneren Reproduktion des Systems, und eine imaginäre, moralisierende Feindbestimmung reicht, um Lücken in der mentalen und ideologischen Homogenität zu schließen.« (“In so far as the concept(ual plan) of mass democracy is projected onto the saturated inner/internal circumstances and relations of Western state society, the question and problem of stability is only a question of the internal/inner reproduction of the system, and an imaginary, moralising determination of the foe suffices to close gaps and holes in mental and ideological homogeneity.”)
»Dafür hat zum Beispiel Karl Mannheim im britischen Exil wegweisende Vorarbeit geleistet. Er sah in Diagnosis of Our Time (1943) in dem vom Liberalismus ererbten Mangel an Einheit das Hauptproblem der modernen Gesellschaft und stellte die Demokratie diesem Mangel entgegen. Sie könne das Einheitsdefizit beheben, wenn es ihr gelänge, eine Geschlossenheit wie unter Kriegsbedingungen zu erreichen. Demgemäß war er, wie schon der Amerikaner William James vor ihm, auf der Suche nach einem moralischen Ersatz für den Krieg, der die liberale Anarchie der Werte überwinden könne. Die vereinten Bindekräfte ein es zentralen Wertes, »soziale Gerechtigkeit«, und einer integrierenden Feindfigur, »Weltfaschismus«, sollten diese Rolle auch für die Zeit nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg übernehmen, ein Programm, das die »Political Correctness« schon früh genau auf den Punkt brachte.« (= “Regarding that, for example, [[THE GREAT]] Karl Mannheim has done pioneering preliminary work in British exile. He saw in Diagnosis of Our Time (1943), in the lack of unity inherited from liberalism, the main problem of modern society and set democracy against this lack of unity. Democracy could fix the deficit in unity if it managed to achieve uniformity, unity, unanimity and homogeneity as [[when]] under wartime conditions. Accordingly, he was, like the American William James before him, in search of (or on the lookout for) a moral substitute for war, which could overcome the liberal anarchy of values. The combined binding forces of a central value, “social justice”, and an integrating foe/enemy figure, “world fascism”, were supposed to assume this role even for the period (of time) after the Second World War, a programme which brought political correctness early on precisely to the heart of the matter.”) [[THIS IS THE LAUNCHING PAD, SO TO SPEAK, FOR THE 1960s-1970s GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ZIO-EXCREMENT (JOOS) WHICH HIDES AND WHO HIDE ITS/THEIR GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH BEHIND “EQUALITY”/“SOCIAL JUSTICE” AND OTHER ZIO-CUM-COLLOBORATORS-PROTESTANT-PAPIST-ATHEIST-FEMINOFAGGOTS-POO-FAECES-DUNG-MAMMON-JUDAS-ZIOCOST-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY-SATANIST IDEOLOGY, AND UNENDING EVIL ZIO-JUDAS-SATANIC(-TALMUDIC) OBFUSCATION ...]]
S. 76 »Gewiss, die Massendemokratie hat eine universelle Perspektive an sich, aber in concreto kann sie im Konkurrenzkampf um die globalen Reichtumschancen nur in der Form föderal- oder nationalstaatlicher Einheit bestehen. Und dieses Angewiesensein auf soziale und politische Einheit als Kampfform steht ihr auf unabsehbare Dauer bevor. Denn Reichtum und Knappheit sind unaufhebbar relativ und deshalb nur in einem unaufhörlichen Prozess des Mehr oder Weniger zu haben. Absehbar ist, dass in diesem Prozess beim Kampf um überlebenswichtige Güter Menschenrechte gegen Menschenrechte stehen werden, was Kondylis fürchten lässt, dass es in paradoxer Konsequenz der humanitären Ethik dabei zu Feindbestimmungen ohne den Schutz zivilisatorischer Ideologie kommen wird.« (“Of course, mass democracy has a universal perspective in itself, but in concrete terms, it can exist in regard to the competition for global opportunities and chances [[of accumulating]] wealth only in the form of federal or national (nation-state) unity. And this reliance/being reliant on social and political unity as a form of struggle lies ahead for an unforeseeable, indefinite period. Because wealth and scarcity are ineluctably relative and, because of that, are to be had only in an incessant process of More or Less. It is foreseeable that in this process – in the struggle over goods important for survival (or: vitally important goods) – human rights will stand against human rights, which causes Kondylis to fear that, in the paradoxical consequence of humanitarian ethics, in the process, it will come to determinations of the foe/foes without the protection of civilisatory ideology” [[since we’ll end up in a struggle of APE against APE]])
S. 79 “Surprise, surprise” – as soon as they declared “The End of Ideologies” immediately after the Collapse of Soviet Communism, the RIDICULOUS ZIO-JOO-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY-Excrement [[CRAZY MAN’S TERM, OBVIOUSLY NOT THE LATE P. FURTH’S]] and THEIR PROTESTANT-PAPIST-COCK-SUCKER-ATHEIST ALLIES AND ASSORTED RETARDS [[CRAZY MAN’S TERM, OBVIOUSLY NOT THE LATE P. FURTH’S]] IMMEDIATELY PROCEEDED TO IMPOSE THEIR OWN DOMINANT IDEOLOGY UNDER MULTI-KULTI “ONE WORLD, GLOBAL VILLAGE” ZIO-EXCREMENT-LOONY BIN-JOO-PSYCHO USA [[CRAZY MAN’S TERM, OBVIOUSLY NOT THE LATE P. FURTH’S]] ... [[HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM ALL THAT ZIO-EXCREMENT? AND IN ANY EVENT, ALL POWERS, WHATEVER THE SIZE, HAVE TO DO THAT ... ]]
CLASSIC FURTH HERE: »Hatte bis dahin der Antikommunismus die westliche Gesellschaft durch den Kampf gegen einen äußeren Feind geeint, so sorgte nun die »Political Correctness« durch die Bekämpfung innerer Feinde für gesellschaftliche Konformität.« (“Until then, anti-communism had united Western society by fighting against an external foe; [[and]] thus, “political correctness”, by combating internal foes, saw to, and ensured, social/societal conformity [[post-Soviet collapse]]”)
S. 79-80 WHAT makes Political Correctness different to previous ideologies is that e.g. Christianity and its Ideological Universalism had as its Bearer, Christians, and whilst Communism and its Ideological Universalism had as its Bearer, Proletarian Communists and or the Communist Party, etc., whereas Political Correctness talks about Man/Humans IN GENERAL, being abstract and empty of (concrete) content (apart from “humans” in general) ...
S. 80 POLITICAL CORRECTNESS OF OUR DAY REVOLVES AROUND THE EMPTY OF CONTENT/HOLLOW BULLDUST (TO BE INTERPRETED ANYWAY THE POWERS THAT BE FEEL LIKE IT) OF a universal collective of humanity, and human dignity as the norm for human individual existence [[CRAZY MAN SAYS: THIS IS, OF COURSE, IS ALL SNEAKY, SNAKY EVIL-DEVIL-DEVIL-EVIL GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY, ZIO-TALMUDIC-EXCREMENT RUBBISH THAT ONLY THE FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISED BELIEVE, BECAUSE “IT JUST HAPPENS” THAT GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ZIO-JOO-VOMIT-DUNG ACCUMULATIONS, CONCENTRATIONS AND CRYSTAL(LISATION)S OF FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH THROUGH HISTORICALLY PRIVILEGED ACCESS TO BANKING, FINANCE, TRADE, CORPORATE AND OTHER FORMS OF CAPITAL (INCL. THE (IL)LEGAL BUT REAL OPIUM TRADE, THE SLAVE TRADE ETC. ETC. ETC.), WITH PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY NETWORKING, INCL. A GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE PRESENCE IN THE MASS MEDIA, MASS ENTERTAINMENT, ELITE UNIVERSITIES, HIGHER COURTS ETC. IN CERTAIN COUNTRIES, GOVERNMENT POLICY FORMATION, TAX OFFICE AND BLACK MARKET BIG MONEY “INVOLVEMENT” (WHEREVER THERE IS A LOT OF MONEY FLOATING AROUND, THE JOO (JUDAS) WILL GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY BE THERE IF HE CAN WHETHER IN THE LEGAL OR ILLEGAL SECTORS OF ANY ECONOMY ... MAO KNEW THAT, UNCLE JO DEFINITELY KNEW THAT, AND SO DID UNCLE HO, AND COMRADE CHE ... SO THEY SET UP THEIR OWN COMMUNIST PARTY MAFIAS TO BE IN CONTROL (OF BOTH THE LEGAL AND ILLEGAL ECONOMIES) ... “HUMAN NATURE”, I SUPPOSE ... ) ... ]]
S. 81 MORE CLASSIC FURTH: »Denn jede Bestimmung enthält unweigerlich auch eine Negation; alle Formen des Sozialen sind erst durch das Miteinander von positivem Selbstbezug und negativer Abgrenzung wirklich. Wegen dieser Ambivalenz sind die partikularen Existenzweisen des Sozialen für denjenigen, dem das Universum Menschheit Wertmaß und Evolutionsziel ist, im Grund nur uneigentliche, vorläufige Verwirklichungen des Menschlichen. So die Ideologie, aber wie ist damit in praxi umzugehen? Natürlich lassen sich Gruppenidentitäten, Lagezwänge, Rollenzumutungen etc. nicht einfach abschaffen.« (“Since every determination and definition inevitably (invariably) also contains a negation; all forms of the social are real only through the being with each other and co-existence of positive self-reference and negative demarcation and delimitation. Because of this ambivalence, the particular modes of existence of the social for him, to whom the universe of mankind/humanity is the measure of value, and the aim of evolution, are basically only improper, provisional realisations of the human. Thus, the ideology, but how, with that, is it the case in praxi (i.e. in practice)? Naturally, group identities, location constraints (or coerced and forced limits as to place, position and situation), impositions of roles etc. cannot simply be abolished.”) [[MAD MAN SAYS: THIS MEANS THAT UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF ZIO-USA HEGEMON(E)Y AN EXTREME FORM OF ANTI-WHITE AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN AND ANTI-WHITE CHRISTIAN MALE CHAUVINISM AND RACISM TAKES PLACE WERE JOOs/SATANISTS AND OTHER EVIL POWER-HUNGRY PEOPLE ACCUMULATE GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE FORMS OF POWER AND PRIVILEGE AGAINST WHITES IN GENERAL AND FORMERLY 90%+ WHITE AND CHRISTIAN SOCIETIES UNDER THE EXTREME RACISM OF DISGUSTING JOO ANIMALS AND THEIR COCKSUCKING SATANIST ALLIES PLAY A GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ROLE IN LEADING WHITE MAN INTO POTENTIAL AUTO-GENOCIDE, SINCE WHITE MAN IS SO LOBOTOMISED THAT HE BELIEVES HIS GENOCIDE IS GOOD FOR HIM IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF KONSUM, HEDONISMUS AND GENERAL LOBOTOMISATION OF FULL-SPECTRUM BRAIN-WASHING ... OF COURSE, THE CHINESE (HAN MAN) AND THE JAPANESE (JAP MAN) AND INDIANS OF INDIA (HINDU MAN) AND ALL THE NEGRO MEN OF BLACK AFRICA GET TO KEEP THEIR RACIAL RELATIVE HOMOGENEITY WHILST THE PEOPLES OF THE WEST AUTO-GENOCIDE THEMSELVES OUT OF EXISTENCE ... AND ONCE APE MAN DOMINATES, THE ONLY COMPENSATION TO EVENTUATE WILL BE THAT THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY COMPOUND AND BUNKER WILL BE OVERRUN BY APE MAN ... OR HAN MAN WILL HAVE TO MAKE A PRE-EMPTIVE (CONTROLLED) NUCLEAR STRIKE AGAINST THE ZIO-EXCREMENTAL FILTH (SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY COMPOUND AND BUNKER) SO THAT THE ZIO-JUDAS JOO FAECES-POO-DUNG FILTH (VOMIT) DON’T BLOW UP THE WHOLE WORLD WITH THEIR NUKES ...]]
S. 83 Political correctness as speech hygiene with severe sanctions etc. [[CRAZY MAN MAKES THE OBVIOUS POINT, JUST SO THERE IS NO MISUNDERSTANDING: SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION PER SE AS NON-NORMATIVE VALUE-FREE OR AXIOLOGICALLY FREE OBSERVATION DOES NOT JUDGE AS POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE THE CURRENT DOMINANT INTERPRETATIONS AND DEFINITIONS OF “RACISM” OTHER “-ISMS”, “-PHOBIAS” AND “ANTI-THIS, ANTI-THAT” ... IF SOCIETY “WORKS” ON THAT BASIS (AND IF THE SATANIST JOOs AND THEIR ALLIES GET AWAY WITH IT), THEN SO BE IT, FROM THE STRICTLY SCIENTIFIC POINT OF VIEW ... BUT I AS A CRAZY MAN AM NOT JUST A SCIENTIFIC OBSERVER ... I WEAR A SECOND HAT, THAT OF AN ANTI-SATANIST BELIEVER IN THE VIRGIN MARY AND THE ORTHODOX CHURCH (HELLENIC-ROMAN STYLE) AND I ANATHEMATISE AND CURSE THE SATANISTS (JUDAS EXCREMENT EVIL-DEVIL-DEVIL-EVIL PEOPLE) AND ALL THEIR PAPIST AND PROTESTANT AND ATHEIST AND COCK-SUCKING FEMINO-FAGGOTISED AND FEMINISTIC-RETARDED APE-WORSHIPING OTHERISING AUTO-GENOCIDAL ALLIES ... ]]
»Das macht eine Sprache der Verständigung, die von der kooperativen Gegenseitigkeit der Sprecher und von der Freigabe assoziativer Spontaneität lebt, unmöglich.« (= “This makes a language of understanding and agreement, which lives on the co-operative reciprocity and mutuality of speakers and the release of associative spontaneity, impossible.”)
A kind of linguistic behaviorism ensues based on the basic or fundamental assumption that thinking and behavior depend on linguistic and language conditions [[MADMAN ADDS: THIS CAN ONLY HAPPEN IN CONDITIONS OF AN ABUNDANCE OR SURPLUS OF GOODS (GOING BACK INTO CENTURIES OF CHEAP LABOUR UP-ROOT, DE-ROOT (SUPER-)EXPLOITATION OF HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF WHITES AND OTHERS) WHERE THE ZIO-EXCREMENT (JUDAS PEOPLE, SATANISTS) AND THEIR ALLIES GET AWAY WITH INDOCTRINATING AND BRAIN-WASHING PEOPLE IN WHAT TO THINK AND WHAT TO SAY ... IT’S ABSOLUTELY SICK STUFF, AND INCLUDES ZIO-COST WORSHIP, WHEN SO MANY HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS PEOPLE DIED AS INNOCENTS IN THE 20TH CENTURY INCL. SO MANY MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS (TENS AND TENS AND TENS OF MILLIONS) OF MY ORTHODOX BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND DESCENDANTS THEREOF ... THESE JUDAS (ZIO) ANIMALS ARE FUCKING SICK FUCKING ANIMALS = TOTAL EVIL AND TOTAL SATANISM ... BUT EVERYONE SHOULD OBEY THE LAW, AND BE NICE TO EVERYONE, BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING MUCH WE CAN DO AS WE ARE ALL LOCKED-IN TO MAMMON, SO TO SPEAK, AND ALL ON OUR WAY TO APE-JUNGLE MAN OR SOMETHING EVEN WORSE ... (OR BETTER, IF YOUR INTO TOTAL ANNIHILATION OF EVERYTHING HUMAN), ...]]
“POEM” TO THE CIA, THE KGB, THE CPC AND ALL THE OTHER “AGENCIES” INTERESTED IN ME (I THINK UNDER SELF-DELUSION) ...
(OR: THE PURPOSE OF THE INTERNET IS FOR EVERYONE TO SPY ON EVERYONE ... ) ...
DON’T WORRY AGENTS,
AT THE END OF THE DAY,
IF YOUR GOVERNMENTS
DON’T SORT THINGS OUT
EVERYONE GOES INTO THE DEEP FRY,
NOT JUST THE SATANISTS
AND WE NEVER FORGET THAT, FOR TO THE SATANISTS,
I AM A SATANIST (OR WHATEVER TERMINOLOGY
THE SATANISTS USE),
AND THAT’S THE WAY IT GOES.
KANT WAS RIGHT,
NOT ABOUT THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE,
BUT ABOUT EVERYONE STAYING IN AND ON THEIR OWN TURF.
THAT WAY
WE ALL KNOW
OUR BOUNDARIES.
*
S. 84-85 CLASSIC FURTH TIME! »Was die Political Correctness anstrebt, ist also nur zum Schein die Aufhebung von Verhältnissen der Diskriminierung, in Wirklichkeit betreibt sie letztlich nur ihre Umkehrung. Sie setzt nicht eine beidseitige Reflexion frei, sondern eine einseitige Verkehrung von Über und Unterordnung.« (“What political correctness strives for and after (aims at or aspires to) is, therefore, the abolition of the relations, circumstances and conditions of discrimination; in reality, it carries out or conducts, ultimately, only its (i.e. discrimination’s) reversal (or inversion). It does not set free a reflection on both sides, but a one-sided reversal (distortion or twisting) of supra-ordination and subordination.”)
S.85 Political Correctness’s morality is partisan. There is privilege for “victims” who are “allowed” to openly HATE etc.. Real world inequality remains, though, and we all know in favour of WHOM, GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY ... SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ... SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ... SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ...
S. 86 Not the “why” and the “what for”, but the “how” sets the tone for “decency” and what can be said in “good society” etc..
S. 86-87 With an emphasis on what is “proper” in what one says ... »In Erinnerung an Goethes Tasso kann es einem so vorkommen, als wäre die Political Correctness so etwas wie die demokratische Version der Frauenrolle in der höfischen Kultur.« (= “In memory of Goethe's Tasso, it may seem to someone as if Political Correctness were something like the democratic version of the female role in courtly culture.”) [[AAAAAAAAAAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]
S.87 SO, it’s no surprise that Feminism played a leading role in enforcing Political Correctness [[THE FUCKING DUMB, POWER-HUNGRY, (OFTEN BARREN) STUPID BITCHES AND SLUTS, PLAYING A LEADING ROLE TOWARDS OUR OWN AUTO-GENOCIDE ...]]
S. 88 Some examples of Pathological PSYCHO-LOBOTOMISATION IN ZIO-USA “ACADEMIA” ...
s. 89 Political correctness as the politicisation of privacy or a privatisation of politics ... depending on the situation ...
S. 90 “Tyranny of intimacy” (Richard Sennett = end of bourgeois public sphere when was separate from the private sphere, so that now up to “everything” is policed in terms of language used etc.) = characteristic of the formation of the mass-democratic mentality ...
S. 91 »Sie [[Political Correctness]] betreibt durch die Aufstellung normativer Modelle die Gleichschaltung des kollektiven Verhaltens und läßt dabei zugleich Spielräume mentaler Indolenz oder Abweichung offen.« (“Political Correctness carries on and conducts through the setting up normative models, the synchronisation and enforced conformity of collective behavior, and in the process, at the same time, leaves room to move open for mental indolence or deviation/divergence.”)
S. 91-92 Hypocrisy, like in all situations of ideology, is omnipresent with Political Correctness ...
S. 92 Political Correctness is based on the Rousseau-like axiom of “Man is of his Nature good” since it aims at a permanently peaceful co-existence with supposedly no God, Prince or Tyrant ruling over people ... [[= CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH THE SATANISTS (JOOS, JUDAS-EXCREMENT, HEEBROO-VOMIT – SUBJECTIVELY SEEN AS A MATTER OF TASTE IN RELATION TO OBJECTIVE FACTS) AND THEIR MANY ALLIES (CORPORATIONS, BANKING AND FINANCE, PROPERTY, MASS MEDIA AND MASS ENTERTAINMENT, CASINOS, THE UNDERWORLD, ETC. ETC. ETC. – ANYTHING THAT CIRCULATES MONEY) CAN ACCUMULATE GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH UNDER ZIO-USA]]
S. 93-94 Hypocrisy again ... which goes with Political Correctness ... and Philanthropy etc. ...
S. 95 ABSOLUTELY FUCKING CLASSIC FURTH, GOD BLESS HIM! I AM GOING TO ASK HIM FOR THE PRIVILEGE TO SHAKE HIS HAND ...
»Ideologien haben es an sich, Sein und Sollen zu identifizieren oder das Sollen als das wahre Sein zu verstehen. Nun ist die Wirklichkeit immer nur als Differenz zwischen Sein und Sollen, zwischen tatsächlich Seiendem und ideal Gesolltem anzutreffen. An dieser Differenz laborieren Ideologien von Anfang an; diese Differenz bildet ihr eigentliches Problem und gibt ihnen insofern ihren genuinen Arbeitsgegenstand. Denn die Differenz muß auf irgendeine Art und Weise aufgehoben werden, sei es, daß sie dem säkularen Diesseits angelastet, als Schein und Täuschung oder als historische Vorläufigkeit erklärt wird. Auch der Humanitarismus nahm von vornherein an dieser Problematik teil. Um die Diskrepanz zwischen der Humanität als Vollendung der Geschichte und dem Istzustand erträglich zu machen, wurde gewissermaßen als Hilfshypothese die zusätzliche Grundannahme von der Perfektibilität des Menschen aufgestellt. Sie wurde maßgeblich für den modernen Stellenwert von Humanwissenschaften und Bildungspolitik. Aktueller Ausdruck davon ist die Political Correctness.« (= “Ideologies have it in themselves to identify and equate Is (Being) and Ought, or to understand (the) Ought as true Is (Being). Now reality is always to be found (or encountered) only as a difference between Is (Being) and Ought, between what is actually existing and (in) being, and, what is ideally wanted as an Ought. In (regard to) this difference, ideologies labour, toil away at and struggle, from the beginning; this difference constitutes their actual, real problem and, in this respect, gives them (i.e. ideologies) their genuine object or work, labour (i.e. of existing and struggling (normatively) for something). Because the difference must be abolished in some way, be it attributed to the secular From Here (i.e. This World or Life), declared to be Appearance and Deception, or, declared to be historical provisionality. Humanitarianism also took part in this examination of the problem from the outset/beginning. In order to make the discrepancy between Humanity as the completion of History and the Is-State of Affairs (i.e. the actual state of reality) bearable, the additional basic or fundamental assumption of the perfectibility of Man (humans) was set up as an, as it were, auxiliary hypothesis (i.e. hypothesis of helping the bridging of the gap between Ideology and Reality). It became decisive for the modern status of humanities and education policy. The current expression of this is Political Correctness.”)
I AM GOING TO ASK HIM FOR THE PRIVILEGE TO SHAKE HIS HAND
...
I AM GOING TO ASK HIM FOR THE PRIVILEGE TO SHAKE HIS HAND
WHEN I FIND MYSELF IN THE AFTER DEATH LAND
AND THERE MY DEAR FRIEND PETER AND I
SHALL BE SITTING AT THE FEET OF THE TEACHERS
AND WE SHALL BE LISTENING TO P.K.’s CONVERSATIONS
WITH BARUCH AND THOMAS
NICCOLO AND MICHEL
WITH CHARLES-LOUIS DE SECONDAT (THE BARON)
AND P.K.’s BELOVED DENIS (AND CORNELIUS, A GOOD CO-ETHNIC
MATE OF P.K.’s and MINE)
AND WITH CARL AND KARL (DA JOO) AND IMMANUEL TOO
AND NEVER FORGET MAX
RAYMOND, THE HUNGARIAN, OTTO, WERNER AND REINHART
(AND HANS-JOACHIM (WHO DOES NOT EVER SHOW HIS
FEATURES))
AND FRIEDRICH! HOW COULD WE LEAVE FRIEDRICH OUT!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(THUCYD. AND ARISTOT. (AND PLATO AND SOCRAT AND CICERO
AND SCIPIO AND SENECA AND MANY OTHERS) ARE SLEEPING
AND DISTURB THEM ... WE SHALL NOT)
AND THERE WILL BE OTHERS THERE
BUT, ALSO, VITALLY
THE WOMEN WILL KNOW THEIR PLACE
THOSE WHO SHOULD BE IN THE CLOSET WILL BE IN THE CLOSET
AND THE ONLY PEOPLE PARADING
WILL BE THE MEN OF WAR (THE WAR MEN)
FOR IN THE AFTER DEATH LAND
THE MEN ARRIVE
THE GREAT WARRIORS OF ALL THE TRIBES
FROM THE HAN AND THE HINDU
TO THE GREEK (HELLENE) AND ROMAN
AND ALL THE OTHER TRIBESMEN
AND GREAT TRIBAL WARRIORS
REGARDLESS OF RACE, ETHNOS, RELIGION OR COLOUR
IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THEY ARE CIVILISED, SAVAGE,
ABORIGINAL OR NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN.
BUT NOT THE PARASITES.
NO PARASITES IN THE AFTER DEATH LAND.
[[THE PARASITES ALAYS GO TO AND ARE IN HELL]]
AND SO
I AM GOING TO ASK HIM FOR THE PRIVILEGE TO SHAKE HIS HAND
WHEN I FIND MYSELF IN THE AFTER DEATH LAND
AND THERE MY DEAR FRIEND PETER AND I
SHALL BE SITTING AT THE FEET OF THE TEACHERS
*
S. 96-97 MASTER CLASS FURTH STUFF HERE!!!! »So wie sich die humanitäre Moral von der Philanthropie her versteht, werden in der anthropologischen Skepsis die Spuren der Misanthropie entdeckt. Die Feindschaft, die dazugehört, bemißt sich nach der Höhe des zu verteidigenden Zieles. Die Political Correctness ist wie der Pazifismus eminent feindselig; ein Symptom dafür: Für die Political Correctness gibt es eine neue Verbrechensart – Haßverbrechen.« (= “Just as humanitarian morality understands itself as starting from philanthropy, traces of misanthropy are discovered in anthropological scepticism. The enmity that belongs to it (i.e. [[this so-called]] misanthropy), is proportionate to the height of the aim, objective or target being defended. Political correctness, like pacifism, is eminently hostile; a symptom of that: for Political Correctness there is a new crime – hate crimes.”) [[SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ... SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ... SATAN, SATAN, MONKEY, MONKEY, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ... MORE ZIO-EXCREMENT JOO HATE OF THE MULTI-KULTI DIVIDE AND RULE, DIVIDE AND CONQUER AND ACCUMULATE FOR OUR SATANIC SELVES GROSSLY DISPROPOTIONATE FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH INCL. IMPOSING AUTO-GENOCIDE AND ZIOCOST WORSHIP ON FORMERLY WHITE CHRISTIAN PEOPLES, BY GETTING THEM TO AGREE TO IT ... I.E. THEIR OWN SELF-EXTINCTION... THE PROBLEM OF COURSE FOR THE SATANISTS AND THEIR ALLIES IS THE HETEROGONY OF ENDS AND THE APE-JUNGLES CURRENTLY BEING FORMED ALL OVER EUROPE, WHICH WILL EVENTUALLY EAT THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY COMPOUND AND BUNKER TOO. GOOD! BECAUSE IF WE GO, AND WE ARE GONE, THEN YOU ARE NOW HAVING THE BONE POINTED AT YOU, AND YOU ARE GOING DOWN TOO, FILTHY, DISGUSTING ZIO-EXCREMENTAL JUDAS SATANISTS!!!]]
S. 97 After the 1960s-1970s Cultural Revolution, the Gramsci Line of Cultural Hegemony shook off its class/proletarian AND NATIONAL-LIBERATION STRUGGLE limitations and “hooked up” as “left-wing” with the [[CRAZY MAN TERMINOLOGY]] ZIO-USA WW2 VICTORS IDEOLOGY OF DESTROYING WHAT REMAINED OF THE WEST IN ORGIES OF ZIO-USA MILITARY, ECONOMIC, STRATEGIC AND CULTURAL HEGEMONY AND IMPERIALISM (BROADLY DEFINED) ...
S. 98 For Germany, all this meant a rigid almost totalitarian-like of fascistic-like “anti-fascism” and “anti-revisionism” ... incl. GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ZIO-COST WORSHIP WHEN MORE THAN 250 MILLION NON-ZIO INNOCENTS DIED IN THE 20TH CENTURY INCL. MILLIONS OF GERMANS AND TENS OF MILLIONS OF ORTHODOX PEOPLES OR THEIR DESCENDANTS ... FROM GREECE, IONIA, ANATOLIA, PONTUS AND ARMENIA TO THE SERBIAN AND RUSSIAN HEARTLANDS (NOT TO MENTION ALL THE CHINESE, AND ASIANS AND KAFFIRS, AND AFRICANS AND LATINOS) ... THIS IS ABSOLUTELY FILTHY AND SICK STUFF THAT ONLY JOOS AND SATANISTS AND THEIR ALLIES COULD COUNTENANCE ...
From class-oriented socialist humanism to the ethical universalism of human rights (multinational corporations/JOOporations and American/ZIO-USA universalism, Femino-Faggotism and all the MULTI-KULTI ZIO-COST ZIO-EXCREMENT and White/Christian AUTO-GENOCIDE ... ) ... AND ZIO-SATANISM OF GROSS DISPROPORTIONALITY IN THE ACCUMULATION OF FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH UNDER ZIO-USA TUTELAGE ...
S. 99 Morality, Political Correctness and the Influence of the Media [[WHICH CRAZY MAN CALLS “FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-USA LOBOTOMISATION”]] ... And perhaps, ironically, the Great British Historian, E. H. Carr saw there as an Important Gain for Progress in such Media Influence ... though Carr obviously did not see the state of “the West” c. 2019!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
S. 100 So, we have an ideology of (MASS MEDIA) control in which mobilisation and apathy, engagement and indolence exist next to one another or can alternate without any consequence to their co-existence ...
S. 101 »So ist, was die Linken nicht wahrhaben wollen, die Political Correctness eben nicht für die Herstellung wirklicher Gleichheit zuständig, sondern für die Erzeugung »gefühlter« Gleichheit im Rahmen eines Ethos uneingeschränkter Akzeptanz.« (“Thus, what the [[so-called]] Left does not want to admit, Political Correctness is exactly not responsible for the establishment (manufacture, making, production, creation or fabricating) of true equality, but for the generation and production of “felt (sensed or perceived)” equality within the framework of an ethos of unrestricted and unlimited acceptance.”) [[WHILST THE ZIO-SATANISTS AND THEIR ALLIES (FOR ALL THE REASONS REPEATEDLY EXPLAINED) ENJOY GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH ... AND “EVERYONE ELSE” IS IN WHAT NOT A FEW PEOPLE OFTEN REFER TO AS “VIRTUAL REALITY” OR “THE MATRIX” ETC. ]]
S. 101 Political Correctness, Globalisation, Humanitarianism ... [[FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION]] ... [[ARE ALL PART OF SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY DESIGNS (ZIO-GREAT BRITAIN, ZIO-FRANCE, ZIO-USA, [[WARBURGS, ROTHSCHILDS, MORGANS, ROCKEFELLERS ET AL.]]) TO TURN THE WORLD INTO ONE SATANIC HELL-HOLE OF MAMMONISM AND SATANISM, WHEREBY THE ZIO-SATANISTS (JOOS) AND THEIR PROTESTANT AND PAPIST AND ATHEIST AND HOMOSEXUAL (AND SOME ISLAMIC AND OTHER ALLIES) GET TO GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY DOMINATE EVERYTHING IN THEIR SICK FANTASY-LAND ONE-WORLD, GLOBAL VILLAGE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ZIO-DREAMS .... WELL, HAN MAN AND APE MAN AND ANY OTHER MAN WITH BALLS IS GOING TO DO THE “BIG FUCK YOU!!!” TO THAT KIND OF ZIO-EXCREMENTAL SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY BULLSHIT, ONE WAY OR ANOTHER ... MY TRIBE DID NOT MAKE IT, WE ARE DEAD, BUT GOOD LUCK ESPECIALLY TO OUR ORTHODOX RUSSIAN BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND TO ITALIANS AND SPANIARDS (AND LATINOS) WHOM I LOVE TOO !!! GOOD LUCK!!!]] ...
S. 102 The global dynamics of capitalistic production = abolish everything in the way of mass consumption... = ABSOLUTE FUCKING (ZIO AND CO) INSANITY ...
S. 102-103
CLASSIC FURTH AGAIN!!! MASTER-CLASS STUFF!!!
»Die Political Correctness hat dabei die Rolle, Konsumzugänge zu entgrenzen, Käuferrollen zu enthierarchisieren, Akzeptanzschwellen abzubauen, überhaupt für die Verschmelzung von Konsum und idealen Selbstwertgefühlen zu sorgen. Das ist funktional für die Öffnung kapitalistischer Räume, ist aber, wenn es um die Verteidigung des Vorsprungs geht, dysfunktional. Was als die Legitimation des Ressentiments gegen die Metropolen begann, stellt sich dann leicht als eine Umkehrung der Hierarchien heraus. Zivilgesellschaftlich ist das längst geschehen. Der Gegensatz zwischen andrängenden Wanderungsmassen und autochthoner Bevölkerung wird verleugnet, die Frage »Wer-Wen?« ist verpönt wie Selbstachtung unter décadents; in der Folge sorgt auf Seiten der Mehrheitsgruppen die Selbstdiskriminierung für Identität. Die globalen Migrationen von Menschen, Investitionen und Produktionsstätten, der Kampf um die materiellen Güter, welche die Werte repräsentieren, die menschenrechtlich allen gleich zugute kommen sollen, das sind Prozesse, die in anomische Situationen hineinführen. Die Political Correctness ist als eine soziale Kontrolle zu verstehen, die auf solche Entwicklungen hin angelegt ist, wie ein Impfstoff, der den pathologischen Zustand, gegen den er immunisieren soll, vorwegnimmt.« (“Political Correctness has, in the course of this, the role of opening up the bounds of consumer access, to de-hierarchise buyers’ roles, to reduce acceptance thresholds [[i.e. so consumers/buyers are more accepting of the SHIT or CRAP (subjectively seen as a matter of Taste) sold to them by JOOs and their ALLIES]], and to take care of and ensure in general the fusion of consumption and ideal feelings of self-esteem [[“SHOPPING THERAPY” AND OTHER ZIO-JOO-EXCREMENTAL NONSENSE ETC.]]. This is functional for the opening up of capitalistic spaces, but is dysfunctional when it comes to the defence of the lead (or edge, start and (associated) advantages) [[of the advanced capitalistic economies, i.e. ZIO-USA, Germany, Japan, UK, France, Italy etc.]]. What began as the legitimisation of the resentment against the metropolises, then easily turns out to be a reversal of the hierarchies. Civil society has long since happened or taken place (i.e. it is over and done). The contrast and opposition between crowding masses of migration, and, the autochthonous, indigenous people (populace, population) is denied, and the question “who-whom?” is frowned upon as self-esteem and self-respect amongst décadents; as a result, self-discrimination [[i.e. AUTO-RACISM OR SELF-RACISM (AS FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO/USA LOBOTOMISATION) ETC.]] on the part of the majority groups takes care of and ensures identity. The global migrations of people, investments and production plants, the struggle for material goods, which represent the values, which in terms of human rights are supposed to benefit everyone, are the processes which lead right into anomic situations. Political Correctness is to be understood as a social [[mechanism of]] control which is formulated and set up for such developments, just like a vaccine which anticipates the pathological condition (state) against which it is supposed to immunise.”) [[THIS OF COURSE MEANS THAT IF THE VACCINE DOES NOT WORK OR EVENTUALLY WEARS OFF OR IS NOT BOOSTED, AS THE CASE MAY BE, WE ARE ALL WELL AND TRULY APEMAN FUCKED ...]]
Mass Media (A Review)
S. 107 Mass media = industrialisation of communication = absolutely essential for mass democracy to prevail.
British historian Edward Hallett Carr connected the mass media with social progress in terms of Progress/History in the middle of the 20th century ...
S. 108 Günther Anders = disappointment in progress + “Promethean shame.” Who the FUCK is Günther Anders? WAIT TILL YOU READ THIS! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [[ “Günther Anders (born Günther Siegmund Stern; Breslau, 12 July 1902 – Vienna, 17 December 1992) was a German Jewish philosopher, journalist, essayist and poet. Trained in the phenomenological tradition, he developed a philosophical anthropology for the age of technology, focusing on such themes as the effects of mass media on our emotional and ethical existence, the illogic of religion, the nuclear threat, the Shoah, and the question of being a philosopher. In 1992, shortly before his death, Günther Anders was awarded the Sigmund Freud Prize.” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Günther_Anders) = ANOTHER FUCKING JOO WHO WON A JOO PRIZE!!! WELL, GOOD FOR YOU!!! I CANNOT COMMENT ON THE VALUE OR OTHERWISE OF HIS THOUGHT, BECAUSE I HAVEN’T STUDIED HIM, AND DON’T HAVE THE TIME TO DO SO ... ]]
S. 108-109 Günther Anders = mass of information creates a consciousness for which the relationship to the world and to reality becomes uncertain, fictional and ambiguous = THAT SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD OBSERVATION! ... VERY INTERESTING ...
S. 109 »Industrialisierte Kommunikation ist mediengesteuerte Kommunikation - mediengesteuert und nicht medienvermittelt.« = “Industrialised communication is media-steered/controlled/driven communication – media-steered/controlled/driven and not media-transmitted”. THAT TO ME SOUNDS LIKE FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION, GIVEN WHO GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATLY OWNS OR CONTROLS THE MASS MEDIA IN KEY HISTORICAL CAPITALISTIC COUNTRIES AND UNDER WHICH EMBASSIES THE REST OF THE “WEST” IS “GUIDED” IDEOLOGICALLY ... FUCKING VOMIT (= SUBJECTIVE MATTER OF TASTE RE: OBJECTIVE FACTS)
S. 110 Günther Anders = “ontological ambiguity” re: mass media, its products, the means and the ends etc..
S. 110-111 TV as “phantom” and “matrix” – it’s always in the present, yet there is no real-world, person to person interaction etc. ... I’d just call it THE IDIOT BOX CUM FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION ... = SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY BRAIN WASHING ... = MEANS OF PROPAGANDA ...
S. 111-112 The quasi-behaviouristic aesthetics of the media has a non-ideological/post-ideological component [[I am not sure if this absolutely correct ... ??? ... OK, in the sense that “the feel” one gets for e.g. quick changing scenes and mobility and humans as black etc. has a colour/space-time content that does not contain an ideological-political message ... but is still within The Political because it contributes to the notion that it’s OK for Whites to Auto-Genocide themselves out of existence will the ZIO-Excrement (Joos personifying JUDAS) is/are “Funny and Chosen” ... when all they are doing is preparing future generations of their own for the DEEP FRY ... because that’s where they are going ... sooner or (much) later ... JOOs have no sense of the Heterogony of Ends ... their minds are “programmed” to think The Straight Line of Progress in History, and the Protestants, Papists, Atheists and Assorted Male/Female and IT FREAK-SHOW Cock-Suckers follow ...]]
S. 112 The Media/TV audiences = as if with Stoic apathy, Epicurean ataraxy ...
S. 112-113 Reference to Nietzsche’s »Herrenrecht der Grausamkeit« = “mens’/masters’ law/mastery of cruelty and savagery” ... the Gods are no longer the friends of cruel games ... the TV audience is ... In the comfort of one’s home one can vicariously suffer to a historically unheard-of degree ...
S. 113 no Old World/Christian »nostalgies de la croix« could ever train himself to the levels of being vicariously compassionate in regard to being submitted to all the cruelty and suffering as depicted every night on the ZIO-IDIOT-BOX, without actually being the victim or participating in the actual action of what is being portrayed ...
Viewing the passions and suffering of Others whilst the Others don’t look back at us SO THERE IS NO SHAME ON OUR PART ...
S. 113-114 CLASSIC FURTH TIME!!! GO PETER!!! LEGEND!!!
»Nichts Menschliches bleibt unbeobachtet, wohl aber bleibt es fremd. Wir teilen nämlich nicht seine Situation, das ist die Bedingung. So bleibt es bei aller augenscheinlichen Präsenz abstrakt und kommt über eine Gegenwart, durch die eine Abwesenheit geht, nicht hinaus. Wir nehmen an Hinrichtungen, an Napalmfeuern, an der Freude der Geretteten, an Furcht und Trauer der Wartenden teil, aber das Maß dabei setzt unsere Muße. So allgegenwärtig wir auf unserem Zuschauersessel sein können, so abgeschwächt müssen die Situation und Regungen sein, die wir zu uns kommen lassen, sie würden uns sonst wahnsinnig machen oder zerreißen. Je mehr durch die Telekommunikation anwesend gemacht wird, desto weniger anwesend darf es sein. Aber das läßt unsere eigene Anwesenheit nicht unberührt.« (= “Nothing human remains unobserved, but it (probably or absolutely) remains alien (strange, foreign, Other). We do not, namely, share its situation; that is the condition. Thus, it remains abstract in all apparent (and evident (to the eyes)) presence, and does not go beyond a present, through which an absence goes. We participate in executions, in fires caused by napalm, in the joy of those who have been saved, in the fear and grief of those waiting, but the measure, in the course of this, is set at our leisure. As ubiquitous as we can be on our viewer’s, spectator’s and audience armchair, so attenuated, weakened, toned down, muffled must the situation and stirrings be, which we let come to us, or they would otherwise drive us crazy or tear us apart and to pieces. The more that is made available by means of telecommunication(s), so much the less present it may be. But that does not leave our own presence untouched.”)
S. 114-115 The effect of relief from the stress of living and existence of remote/far ethics AND the model(ling) effect of the products of media communication [[i.e. Mass Media FULL-SPECTRUM-ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION-ZIO-COST-ZIO-JUDAS-GARBAGE-ZIO-EXCREMENT-JUDAS-MAMMON-POO-FAECES-DUNG-FREAKSHOW-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY-DEVIL-EVIL-EVIL-DEVIL-VOMIT]] (= »Entlastungseffekt der Fernethik, sondern ebenso am Modelleffekt der Produkte der Medienkommunikation«).
S. 115 The communications industry and industrially manufactured sentimentality ...
BECAUSE I HAVE PERSONALLY LIVED THE STILL STRONG REMNANTS OF THE PRE-INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION (MOSTLY PRE-MAMMON) ANTI-SATANIST-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY AND ANTI-EVIL-JUDAS-DEVIL-HEBROO/PROTESTANT/PAPIST PEASANT WORLD VIEW, I CAN SEE CLEARY “the profound change in the perception of self and world” (»die tiefgreifende Veränderung der Warhnehmungsweise von Selbst und Welt«) (AND FURTH, BORN IN 1930, OBVIOUSLY HAD A NOTION OF THAT PERSONALLY TOO, BECAUSE MASS DEMOCRACY, WHEN HE WAS YOUNG, WAS STILL IN ITS FORMATIVE STAGES ... SOMETHING SIMILAR APPLIES – MUTATIS MUTANDIS – TO NICE OLD CODJERS (WHO AS PROTESTANTS-PAPISTS ARE FULLY IN CAHOOTS WITH THE SATANISTS, AS IS THEIR HISTORICAL PREROGATIVE, LIKING AND HITHERTO RELATIVE SUCCESS ETC. ETC. ETC. – AND OBVIOUSLY I DON’T HOLD THAT AGAINST THEM, BUT IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HELLENISM, ROMANISM AND ORTHODOXY ... ) ... LIKE PAT BUCHANAN OR DOUG BANDOW OR ROBERT MERRY (OR IN THE UP TO VERY VERY VERY NAUGHTY CLOSET: PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS, RON UNZ AND KEVIN MACDONALD (WHO AS FAR AS I AM AWARE, IS WAY WAY WAY TOO NAUGHTY TO MENTION IN “POLITE SOCIETY” ... AND IS PROBABLY MORE PRONE TO (MORE) (CERTAIN) ERRORS THAN THE OTHERS (THOUGH STILL MAKES MANY (NOT A FEW) VALID POINTS TOO)) ... ET AL. ... ) ... OBVIOUSLY, FUTURE GENERATIONS WON’T KNOW, BUT THAT DOES NOT AT ALL MEAN THAT THEY WILL ALL “TOW THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY PARTY LINE” ... NOT AT ALL ... AND, ANYWAY, HAN MAN AND OR APE MAN OR SOME OTHER MAN IS GOING TO PUT A STOP – ONE WAY OR ANOTHER – TO THE FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMY ZIO-COST SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY “PARTY” ...
FOR THIS IS THE ZIO-COST
FOR THIS IS THE ZIO-COST
WHICH MUST BE PAID ON AN UP-ROOT, DE-ROOT
CHEAP LABOUR
JOURNEY TO HELL
(FOR HE TOOK THE BOAT TO HELL
POOR MAN, YOU TOOK THE BOAT TO HELL
DEAR FATHER, FOR YOU DID NOT KNOW
WHAT YOU WERE DOING, POOR, WRETCHED DEVIL)
WHEN MAMMON COMING OUT OF SATAN’S ARSE-HOLE
SPREADS HIS SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY NET AND WEB
AND UNENDING MAMMONISING, OTHERISING MULTI-KULTI
DIVIDE AND RULE, DIVIDE AND CONQUER
ZIO-GREAT BRITAIN, ZIO-FRANCE, ZIO-USA
EVIL HATE
WORLD-WIDE
AND HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS DIE AND SUFFER AND DIE
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS (RUSSIANS,
SERBIANS, GREEKS, ROMANS, HELLENES, ARMENIANS)
AND WHITES AND OTHER CHRISTIANS (INCLUDING GERMANS)
AND ATHEISTS
AND CHINESE AND OTHER ASIANS (JAPS, VIETS, PARKS ET AL.)
AND KAFFIRS AND
AFRICANS AND LATINOS DIE AND SUFFER AND DIE
AND WHAT DO YOU GET
GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY
FROM THE SATAN TENTS OF TOTAL ETERNAL JUDAS HATE?
ZIO-COST.
ZIO-USA.
ILLEGAL IT IS TO INVESTIGATE THE ZIO.
PERFECTLY LEGAL IT IS TO INVESTIGATE
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS WHO DIED AND SUFFERED AND DIED
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS (RUSSIANS,
SERBIANS, GREEKS, ROMANS, HELLENES, ARMENIANS)
AND WHITES AND OTHER CHRISTIANS (INCLUDING GERMANS)
AND ATHEISTS
AND CHINESE AND OTHER ASIANS (JAPS, VIETS, PARKS ET AL.)
AND KAFFIRS AND
AFRICANS AND LATINOS WHO DIED AND SUFFERED AND DIED.
FOR THIS IS THE ZIO-COST
WHICH MUST BE PAID ON AN UP-ROOT, DE-ROOT
ZIO-USA
CHEAP LABOUR
JOURNEY TO HELL
(FOR HE TOOK THE BOAT TO HELL
POOR MAN, YOU TOOK THE BOAT TO HELL
DEAR FATHER, FOR YOU DID NOT KNOW
WHAT YOU WERE DOING, POOR, WRETCHED DEVIL)
AND NOW THE OLD WORLD HAS BECOME HELL TOO
AND THERE IS NO NOSTOS, MY DEAR WOMAN,
FOR ME AND YOU ...
*
S. 115 CONT. hic et nunc (here and now) REPLACED BY ubique simul (at the same time everywhere)
S. 115-116 “THIS IS LIKE SOME WOW KIND OF GROOVY SHIT”!!! SO THE JOO GÜNTHER ANDERS SEEMS TO HAVE SOME THEORETICAL-EXPLANATORY VALUE ... VERY WELL, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT ... WHAT IS QUALITY IS QUALITY ... AND THAT’S THAT ... (AS FAR AS QUALITY IS CONCERNED ... HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
»Dadurch wird die Raum- bzw. Ortsbezogenheit als principium individuationis aus der Gegenwartsbestimmung entfernt. Gegenwart reduziert sich auf raumungebundene Jetztgenossenschaft, auf ein raumübergreifendes Zugleich. Die das Interesse und die Wertung beschränkende Besonderheit des Raumes tritt hinter den universalen Zeitbezug der tendenziell globalen Relevanz zurück. Die Empfänger der so strukturierten Sendungen werden auf die ubiquitäre Simultaneität ihres Daseins hin angesprochen. Das heißt, ihre Individualität wird durch das Medium von vorherein auf die Form des massenhaften Vorkommens reduziert. Günther Anders konstatiert als den zuletzt erreichten Zustand der Industriegesellschaft: Das Substrat Masse wird durch das Attribut »massenhaft« ersetzt. Als Resultat des Wirkens der Massenmedien verliert auch die Masse ihren quasisubstantiellen Charakter und nimmt funktionelle Züge an.« (= “Through that, the space-relatedness or place/site-relatedness as principium individuationis [[“The principle of individuation, or principium individuationis, describes the manner in which a thing is identified as distinguished from other things. ... For Schopenhauer the principium individuationis constituted of time and space, being the ground of multiplicity. In his view, the mere difference in location suffices to make two systems different, with each of the two states having its own real physical state, independent of the state of the other. ... According to Jungian psychology, individuation (German: Individuation) is a process of psychological integration. “In general, it is the process by which individual beings are formed and differentiated [from other human beings]; in particular, it is the development of the psychological individual as a being distinct from the general, collective psychology.” ... (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individuation)]] is distanced from the determination of the present. The present is reduced to a space-non-dependent co-operative existing now, to a simultaneous state, spanning space. The peculiarity of space restricting and limiting interest and evaluation, is/steps behind the universal reference to time, which tends to have global relevance. The recipients of the broadcasts, transmissions, programs and shows structured in this way are appealed to and targeted as to the ubiquitous simultaneity of their being there/existence. That means that their individuality is reduced by the medium from the outset/beginning (or in advance) to the form of the mass occurrence. Günther Anders states as the last achieved/attained state (of affairs) of industrial society: the substratum mass is replaced by the attribute »mass-like«. As a result of the having an effect of the mass media, the mass loses its quasi-substantive character and assumes/adopts functional features, characteristics, attributes and traits.”)
S. 116 Simultaneity DISSOLVES the unity of the Individual [[WITH ALL THE ZIO-JOO GARBAGE ON “WESTERN” TV ... BUT SOMETHING SIMILAR OF COURSE HAPPENS IN CHINA OR RUSSIA – BUT NOT WITH THE DEEP-JUDAS-SATAN-LOBOTOMISATION AS FEMINO-FAGGOTISATION AND OTHERISATION THROUGH APE WORSHIP AND FREAK-SHOW ZIO-COST BRAIN WASHING ETC. WHILST THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY COMPOUND AND BUNKER HAS A CLEAR SATANIC ORIENTATION AND PURPOSE ... ]] ...
S. 116-117 so after work etc. there is non-stop TV/Radio distractions ...
S. 117 individuality becomes dissolved in a great variety of multiple functions which determine the means and channels of consumption = Günther Anders’s comment of these factual circumstances: Descartes’s assumption no longer applies that it is impossible to design/plan/conceive of one half of any soul (= »concevoir la moitié d’aucune âme«) [[C.f. the surrounding text, which is very enlightening and great practice at reading FRENCH!!! = A great language to READ if you can’t speak it, like me ... »car, en effet, nous ne saurions concevoir la moitié d’aucune âme, comme nous pouvons faire du plus petit de tous les corps ; en sorte que l’on reconnoît« ... (IN THE PRECEDING PASSAGE IT IS CLEAR THAT FOR DESCARTES, BODIES ARE DIVISIBLE, BUT THE SOUL IS INDIVISIBLE: » ... ce qui a été fait en ce lieu-là. Il est requis, outre cela, de savoir que toutes les choses que nous concevons clairement et distinctement sont vraies, de la façon que nous les concevons ; ce qui n’a pu être prouvé avant la quatrième Méditation. De plus, il faut avoir une conception distincte de la nature corporelle, laquelle se forme partie dans cette seconde, et partie dans la cinquième et sixième Méditation. Et enfin, l’on doit conclure de tout cela que les choses que l’on conçoit clairement et distinctement être des substances diverses, ainsi que l’on conçoit l’esprit et le corps, sont en effet des substances réellement distinctes les unes des autres, et c’est ce que l’on conclut dans la sixième Méditation ; ce qui se confirme encore, dans cette même Méditation, de ce que nous ne concevons aucun corps que comme divisible, au lieu que l’esprit ou l’âme de l’homme ne se peut concevoir que comme indivisible; ... ») = Œuvres de Descartes, éd. Cousin, tome I.djvu/236
(https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Œuvres_de_Descartes,_éd._Cousin,_tome_I.djvu/236)) [[THE POINT IS THAT PRE-MASS DEMOCRACY, THE FUNDAMENTAL WORLD VIEW OF CHRISTIAN MAN MEANT EVERY INDIVIDUAL HAD AN INDIVISIBLE SOUL, WHEREAS UNDER ZIO-USA JUDAS-LOBOTOMISED MASS-DEMOCRATIC MAN, EVERY MAN (WITHOUT A SOUL) IS MEAT WHICH BECOMES A COG IN HIS OWN COLLECTIVE’S AUTO-GENOCIDE UNDER FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO/JUDAS/DEVIL-EVIL-EVIL-DEVIL-MAMMON-LOBOTOMISATION WHILST THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY COMPOUND AND BUNKER HAS A CLEAR SATANIC ORIENTATION AND PURPOSE ... JUST AS HAN CHINA STILL HAS HAN ORIENTATION AND PURPOSE ... AND HOPEFULLY MY ORTHODOX RUSSIAN BROTHERS AND SISTERS HAVE ORTHODOX RUS ORIENTATION AND PURPOSE (THOUGH I AM WORRIED THEY WON’T MAKE IT, JUST LIKE WE DIDN’T MAKE IT, BECAUSE WE ARE ALREADY DEADER THAN DEAD BURIED DEAD, DEAD ... ) ... ]]
S. 117-118 Communications, Stimulants, Entertainment, Objects which Vanish in Consumption, and REPEAT [[= A PROCESS OF EXTREME ZIO-JUDAS HATE DE-RACINATION ENDING UP IN SELF-GENOCIDAL FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION AND AUTO-GENOCIDE UNDER ZIO-USA AND SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY MAMMON EVIL INCL. ALL THAT ABSOLUTELY SICK AND VOMIT INDUCING FILTH OF ZIO-COST WORSHIP, OTHERISATION, APE/OTHER WORSHIP AND JUDAS-FEMINO-FAGGOTISATION ... WHILST THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY COMPOUND AND BUNKER AS IT “JUST HAPPENS” HAS A CLEAR SATANIC ORIENTATION AND PURPOSE ... ]]
S. 118 I LOVE THIS SHIT: I TOLD YOUZ ALL SIMMEL WAS A FUCKING LEGEND ... THAT JOO KNEW!!! ... »Die mit der Objektivation des Geistes einhergehende Akkumulation, in der noch Nietzsche und Simmel die Gefahr der Verdinglichung und damit der Entfremdung des Subjekts sahen, wird durch das Zusammenfallen von Medienereignis und Genuß verflüssigt.« (= “The accumulation accompanying the objectification of the spirit/intellect/mind, in which (accumulation) Nietzsche and Simmel saw the danger of reification/objectification and, with that, alienation/estrangement of the subject, is liquefied and made fluid by the coincidence of the media event and enjoyment.”) [[FROM A PURELY SCIENTIFIC POINT OF VIEW, THOUGH, THIS IS NEITHER INHERENTLY GOOD OR BAD, IT’S JUST A SOCIAL PHENOMENON PERTAINING TO A PARTICULAR SOCIAL FORMATION ... SO, LET’S NOT EVER FORGET THAT ...]]
(Bourgeois-like) Education/learning/cultivation under these Mass Media [[FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION]] circumstances becomes a private matter, and lost to the extent it is publically asserted, as is Education’s authority also LOST [[because the non-stop Media/Brain-Wahsing Consumption tied in with Hedonism means the Masses ARE FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTISED IN THE NATIONS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OR RULE OF ZIO-USA ... AND DIFFERENTLY LOBOTOMISED IN CHINA, AND PERHAPS (AT LEAST IN PART) IN RUSSIA WHERE MY ORTHODOX BROTHERS AND SISTERS LIVE WHO DO NOT LOVE ME, BUT I DO LOVE THEM AND WISH THEM WELL GIVEN THAT MY TRIBE IS FULLY DEADER THAN DEAD AND BURIED DEAD, DEAD ETC..]]
S. 118-119 We learn that Günther Anders was way ahead of his time in his studies of the Mass Media (the industrialisation of communication(s)) and whole schools of Media Analysis re: the transformation or reconstructing/rebuilding/alteration/reorganisation of culture and personality etc. have sprung up since this JOO’s analytical prime ...
S. 119 Reference is now made to The Post-Man ... Who the FUCK is Neil Postman? He looks like a JOO ... but the JooPedia article only says that he has collaborated with Joos, and not that he is a Joo ... HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Postman) ...
Postman focused on, inter alia, book culture (broadly of The Bourgeois New Times) vs. mass media communication (of Mass Democracy) ...
S. 119-120 Middle Ages = orality, hierarchical institutions ... The Bourgeois New Times = book culture = more individual-based (cum pragmatic rationalism) than the more group-emphasis existence of the Middle Ages ...
S. 120 In bourgeois culture, the opinions and arguments propagated in the public sphere made clear which opinions were to remain marginalised and which were to be available to the majority for discussion ... politics as a determined and determining factor of the public sphere so that public discourse is legitimised as bonum commune. Hence, the institutionalisation of education, with schools and parents acting as guardians/watchers of information selection [[under conditions of ZIO-USA, that has been “sub-contracted” to, and or appropriated by, the JOOs ... HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Satan, Satan, Monkey, Monkey, Satanic Circus Monkey ... Satan, Satan, Monkey, Monkey, Satanic Circus Monkey ... Satan, Satan, Monkey, Monkey, Satanic Circus Monkey ... ]]
The relations, circumstances and conditions of communication in respect of book culture =/stand for the intellectual-spiritual habitus of the bourgeoisie (= »Die Kommunikationsverhältnisse der Buchkultur stehen für den geistigen Habitus des Bürgertums«) ...
S. 121 The electronic media revolution makes it possible to transport pieces of information worldwide with enormous/prodigious swiftness/at tremendous speed. Information is now bodiless and immaterial ...
+ We get an “optical revolution” + “the re-melting of the world of ideas” into a world of “light/lightning-fast symbols and images/pictures” (Neil Postman).
S. 121-122 »Dadurch wird die Form der Kommunikation von Grund auf verändert: vom Diskursiven zum Nicht-Diskursiven, von der Satzform zur Bildform, von der Logik zur Emotionalität. Denn »anders als der gesprochene oder geschriebene Satz ist das Bild unwiderlegbar. Es stellt keine Behauptung auf, es verweist nicht auf sein Gegenteil oder die Negation seiner selbst«, es erklärt sich selber und muß deshalb keiner logischen Begründung genügen.« (“Through that, the form of communication is changed from the ground, up, i.e. fundamentally: from the discursive to the non-discursive, from the sentence form to the image/picture form, from logic to emotionality. Because “unlike the spoken or written sentence, the picture/image is irrefutable. It makes (sets up or formulates) no assertion, it does not refer to its opposite or the negation of itself” (Neil Postman), it explains itself and because of that does not have to satisfy any logical justification or founding.”)
S. 122-123 OH MY GOD!!! HERE WE GO!!! »Das Fernsehen ist ein rein gegenwartsbezogenes Medium. Alles, was dargestellt wird, erlebt man so, als geschähe es jetzt. Die Fernsehbilder zeigen die augenblicklichen Erwartungen wie Spiegel, die über dem momentan Gegebenen Vergangenes und Zukünftiges ausblenden. Vergangenheit und Zukunft, sofern sie thematisch vorkommen, sind Extrapolationen gegenwärtiger Interessen und Wertentscheidungen. Insbesondere die rationale jetztzeitgeleitete Konstruktion der Vergangenheit hat tiefgreifende Wirkungen auf die politische Urteilsbildung. Denn wenn das historische Bewußtsein als Bewußtseinsform sui generis in den Hintergrund gedrängt wird, dann droht der Gesellschaft der Verlust herkunftgeleiteter kollektiver Identität und damit die emotionale Kraft, die nötig ist, damit die Gesellschaft die Form eines Gemeinwesens annimmt.« (= “Television is a purely present-related, i.e. contemporary, medium. Everything which is (re)presented, one experiences (and lives through) as if it were happening now. The television images and pictures show the immediately present and instantaneous expectations as mirrors which cut out past and present (or make past and present fade out) via what is currently given. Past and future, in so far as they appear and occur in terms of a theme or themes, are extrapolations of present interests and value decisions (i.e. decisions as to values). In particular, the rational, construction accompanied by now-time (i.e. by the present) of the past has profound effects on the formation and development of political judgement. Because if the historical consciousness as a form of consciousness sui generis is pushed into the background, then society threatens the loss of origin/provenance-accompanied collective identity and, with that, the emotional force, which is necessary, for society to adopt or assume the form of a community, polity (or commonwealth).”) [[THIS RELATES TO THE FACT THAT MASS DEMOCRACY AS A COMPARATIVE IDEAL TYPE REPRESENTING A SOCIAL ORGANISATION COMPARED TO OLIGARCHIC BOURGEOIS LIBERLALISM (AND SOCIETAS CIVILIS/LATE FEUDALISM) HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DEMOCRACY AS POLITY, WHICH EXISTED ONLY IN THE (HISTORICAL) HELLENIC-ROMAN WORLD (WITHIN HELLENISM) FROM ANTIQUITY TO THE END OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE (IN ALL ITS VARIATIONS (Cf. CONTOGEORGIS)), WHICH REQUIRES ANTHROPOCENTRIC, PATRIARCHAL, PRE-INDUSTRIAL, NON-MASS, RELATIVELY SMALL-SCALE, MOSTLY AGRARIAN, SOCIETY OF RELATIVE RACIAL AND OR CULTURAL AND OR RELIGIOUS HOMOGENEITY ... AND WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAS PER SE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH JOOS, SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY MAMMON, PROTESTANTS, CHINAMEN, KAFFIRS AND OR MUSULMEN AND OR AFRICANS AND OR INDIANS (OF WHICHEVER KIND) AND OR ABORIGINES ...]]
S. 123 As to personality type, under the conditions of book culture, we have the logical, disciplined, rational/reasonable consciousness of enlightened man ... whereas with television a new basic mood is set [[OF FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-USA LOBOTOMISATION, WHICH IN NON-ANGLO COUNTRIES LIKE GERMANY AND GREECE MEANS THE INFLUENCE OF KONSUM AND HEDONISMUS GIVEN GERMANY AND GREECE ETC. ARE UNDER NOT ONLY THE MILITARY DOMINATION OF ZIO-USA, BUT ALSO ITS CULTURAL GARBAGE-CULTURE HEGEMONY OF EXTENSIVE FEMINO-FAGGOTISATION AND POTENTIAL AUTO-GENOCIDE, INCL. ZIO-COST AND APE/OTHER WORSHIP, AND FREAK-SHOW BRAIN WASHING ... AS IF THE 1932 FILM “FREAKS” IS A KIND OF (PRE-)ZIO-TEMPLATE FOR SOCIETY ... AS D.W. GRIFFITH GETS “PUSHED AWAY”, AS DOES F.W. MURNAU, AND WHILST THE TRANSITIONAL VON STERNBERG AND LUBITSCH WERE TRULY GREAT (AS WAS A. MANN AND KUBRIK, LATER), BY THE 1960S/1970S THE ZIO-EXCREMENT (SUBJECTIVELY SEEN AS A MATTER OF TASTE: RE: OBJECTIVE FACTS) OF “THE GRADUATE” AND “GUESS WHO’S COMING TO DINNER” AND JOHN LENNON/YOKO ONO ETC. ETC. ETC. WERE IN FULL ZIO SWING ...]] The world shown on television is no longer compatible with traditional rationality claims. The art and fantasy world of television favours wishes for the direct satisfaction of needs and stances, in which the way of looking at things and action pass over and merge into one another, and, in this way, infantilises television consumers in the long run. [[= ANOTHER WAY OF SAYING “THE FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMY” HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]
S. 123-124 Literacy as regards literature desired/demanded a high degree of self-restraint/self-domination and postponement or deferment of satisfaction. The book per se for Postman = a medium that demands the subjugation of the body to the mind, whereas television appeals to our physical sensibilities, our unconscious desires, our emotions and affects, sentiments. With a great mass of uncontrollable information, with entertainment and always more and more advertising, television makes us believe that the consumption of goods is the ultimate, absolute bliss, felicity and rupture, putting the viewer into a state of infantile hope for the continued, on-going satisfaction of such need [[for the consumption of GARBAGE (subjectively seen as a matter of Taste)/GOODS]]. Such findings have prompted Postman to characterise or mark/stamp television with the formula of “infotainment”. [[THAT’S JUST ANOTHER WAY OF SAYING FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]
S. 124-125 Reference is now made to Joshua Meyrowitz (No Sense of Place) (probably another ??? – obviously, there is nothing wrong with that per se, whether he is or isn’t, but to someone born in 599A.D. and who has a highly localist-peasant mind, people are characterised by their Religion and or Race and or Culture ... and that’s the way it has been for millennia all over the world ... and just because it’s not “cool” to do so anymore, we “very old-timers” don’t give a FUCK, and have also GONE INSANE ...) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Meyrowitz) ... A key matter for Meyrowitz is »Entortung« = “a sense of displacement or dis-location” = The principium individuationis, which is tied to localisation/placement in a concrete situs, is pushed back by the mass media so that a sense of space being equalised, and equality prevail(s). Meyrowitz sees the generational conflict of the cultural revolution of the 1960s and 1968 etc. as one of people growing up without TV versus people growing up with TV [[I can relate to THAT!]]
[[I NOTE FURTH HAS (EXTENSIVELY) REFERRED TO GÜNTHER ANDERS AND NEIL POSTMAN (AND JOSHUA MEYROWITZ), WHEREAS P.K. IN HIS DECLINE BOOK GIVES NO REFERENCES (FOR OBVIOUS REASONS, INCL. (I CONJECTURE) THE FACT THERE WOULD BE SO MANY JOOS – AT GROSSLY, GROSSLY, GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE LEVELS ... AND I ADD – (YET I HAVE NO EVIDENCE P.K. EVER THOUGHT THIS) – THAT IT IS JUST SICK AND ABSOLUTELY VOMIT DISGUSTING TO A HELLENE, ROMAN FOR THERE TO BE SO MANY JOOS INVOLVED FROM THE 1960s ONWARDS (IT WAS BAD ENOUGH c. 1900 TO THE 1960s!!!) ... AND THERE’S STILL THE MERITORIOUS GOFFMAN, WARHOL (IF IT’S NOT A JOO, IT’LL BE A DEGENERATE!!!), + Vilém Flusser + Bernard Berelson + Edward Bernays, AND, OR COURSE, UNCLE SIGIE (OF SOME-VALUE) FREUD TO COME !!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AT LEAST WE DIDN'T GET MARCUSE MENTIONED !!!]]
S. 125-126 Furth turns his attention to a JOO with certain merit, Erving Goffman (NOT just your average Ridiculous JOO (like THE JooRidDa, or THE Joonkerton, or JooDEEth JooTler – let alone JAX JOOT or JOOniFer JooBin, or the “great filmaker” JOOven JOOLBerG ... the list goes on and on ... even JOOM JOOMSKY is still around et al., et al., et al. ... ) posing as a “major thinker”) re: his theatre-like model of the social situation ... there’s the stage and the public space, and the backstage of the private area ... space is paramount incl. control of access re: walls, windows, doors etc. ... Before the mass media, social knowledge (Soziales Wissen) was acquired only if one partook of a social situation (einer sozialen Situation) = specifically in this space (Raum), in this place (Ort).
S. 126-127 In the New Times world of Book Domination at elite levels, the written word, writings, the text, ... required an education and access to books which meant barriers for most or (later) many people. Learning required knowledge of a hidden curriculum.
S. 127 »Diese Welt der Schranken und Geheimnisse kennt eine besondere Art der Führer, der Erzieher, der Dichter, die in das Innere der Menschen hineinblicken lassen, die Empathie lehren. Eine solche Erziehung wird in der Fernsehgesellschaft nicht mehr gebraucht.« (“This world of barriers, limits, bounds and secrets knows of a particular kind of leader, a particular kind of educator, a particular kind of poet, who let us have a look into the interior/inner world of people, and teach empathy. Such an education is no longer required in the society of the television (television society).” [[= no more Hamlet, so to speak ...]])
The three revolutions caused by television ... 1) masculinity and femininity mix; 2) childhood and adulthood mix; 3) the political Hero is pushed off his Pedestal ...
The Television [[= ZIO-Vision/JUDAS-Vision]] = Voyeur ... spectators observes all the “private” and “intimate” moments on offer ... the theater-related image/picture of society is extended and expands ... front stage and backstage mix ...
S. 128 TV makes normal these inversions ... representation is destroyed, the general is concretised ... on TV, the president is the president [[in news snippets or even during speeches]] without intimate needs etc. ... the Hero is pushed off his Pedestal because once the secret he knew giving him authority is destroyed, then e.g. the Waiter as a Grand Man of the Restaurant, with his private life only at home (as in the pre-TV era) is now someone who has lost his manners ... [[so under the “regime” of ZIO-VISION everything is “out in the open” and (on the surface) “equal(ised)” in the proportionality the JOO wants, and apart from the JOO (JUDAS) (cum allies) wants hidden in his CIAs etc ... or (mutatis mutandis) ... KGBs in Russia or the CPC in China etc ... The Bread and Circuses aspect comes into play, where the JOO provides the natives with their Sports-Ball and their Left-Right politics so the JOO does not get noticed by the Great MASS ... JooVide and JOOL, JooVide and JONQUER...]]
Abstract polarities such as friend / foe, good citizen / criminal etc. are relativised.
S. 129 today the policeman is only an official. Instead of Heroes we have Stars. Stars are heroes of the intimate, perfectionists of shamelessness, that is, an enormous vulgarisation of the Hero. As Andy Warhol [[if it’s not a JOO, it’s a Degenerate!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!]] said, every person will be famous for 15 minutes in the future ...
S. 129-130 In the TV-age (= ZIO-VISION age in the “West”) ... there was a so-called human right to the public sphere (everything is political) and a right to secrets (the social order is in danger).
S. 130 THIS IS INTERESTING: Meyrowitz believes that anomalous developments are possible. He questions whether the destruction of political representation, the dissolution of education, the undermining of authority, the shaking of the totality or collectivity of social roles, are to be understood as signs of the decline of society or forms of society’s transformation [[INTO WHAT? SOME KIND OF JOOTATORSHIP?]]
S. 131 THE OPTIMISTIC VIEW OF THE NEW MASS MEDIA: Vilém Flusser [[WHO THE FUCK IS THAT? “Vilém Flusser (May 12, 1920 – November 27, 1991) was a Czech-born philosopher, writer and journalist. He lived for a long period in São Paulo (where he became a Brazilian citizen) and later in France, and his works are written in many different languages. His early work was marked by discussion of the thought of Martin Heidegger, and by the influence of existentialism and phenomenology. Phenomenology would play a major role in the transition to the later phase of his work, in which he turned his attention to the philosophy of communication and of artistic production. He contributed to the dichotomy in history: the period of image worship, and period of text worship, with deviations consequently into idolatry and "textolatry". ... Flusser was born in 1920 in Prague, Czechoslovakia into a family of Jewish intellectuals. His father, Gustav Flusser, studied mathematics and physics (under Albert Einstein among others).” ANOTHER JOO!!! ANOTHER JOO!!! ANOTHER JOO!!! (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilém_Flusser) HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]] states: “It seems we had been sentenced to ten thousand years of house arrest and are now being let free and released.” [[TYPICAL JOO-ISH JOO-SHIT !!!!]] = a networked society in which all hierarchies have been dismantled, so that everyone can enter into a free game with each other [[WHILST MENTIONING NOTHING ABOUT WHO GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY CONTROLS AND INFLUENCES WHAT (EVEN ON THE INTERNET) ... OH HOW CONVENIENT!!!]] ... and supposedly in the new digital age, the promise of utopia that work, politics, administration, etc. are done by machines and that the people are set free from all need, and thus only communicate ... [[WHILST MENTIONING NOTHING ABOUT WHO GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY CONTROLS AND INFLUENCES WHAT (EVEN ON THE INTERNET) ... OH HOW CONVENIENT!!!]]
S. 131-132 “Communication” as the “Spirit of Mass Democracy” = a kind of manifestation of the (now “out of fashion”) Herd Instinct [[Herd behaviour/mentality = Gustav Le Bon, Freud, Jung et al.]] ... since “everyone” wants to do it ... and “everyone” wants to “be together” [[WHICH IS MORE OR LESS TRUE IN VARIOUS AND DIFFERENT DOSES BECAUSE SUCH DESIRE FOR GROUP AFFINITY, GROUP RECOGNITION, IS “HARD-WIRED” INTO HUMANS IN TERMS OF THE DRIVE/URGE/IMPULSE OF SELF-PRESERVATION AND IDENTITY FORMATION ... THE PROBLEM FOR NON-JOOS WITH NON-JOOISH CONSCIOUSNESS IS HOW LONG THE SATANISTS ARE GOING TO GET AWAY “WITH IT” ... AND UNFORTUNATELY FOR WHAT REMAINS OF THE “WEST” THE CANCER HAS ALREADY SPREAD TOO FAR AND WIDE AND DEEP ... ALL VITAL ORGANS ARE FAILING ... AND WITHIN ABOUT 50 OR 100 OR 150 OR SO YEARS IT WILL BE “ALL OVER RED ROVER” ... THE QUESTION WILL THEN BE IF HAN MAN CAN KEEP HAN SPACE FOR HIMSELF OR WHETHR THE JUNGLE OR NUCLEAR CONFLAGRATION WILL HAVE DESTROYED EVERYTHING ...]]
S. 132-133 It’s not a simplistic case of Base-Superstructure as Old School Marxists meant it ... [[though it in part applies over the very long term – I have asserted MANY A TIME!!!]] ... for ... “in actual fact, in mass democracy, people are differentiated or differ according to the criteria of social everyday life, through private preferences, hobbies, idiosyncrasies and lifestyles. In view of such rather incidental (casual, passing) differences, it is easy to take care of and ensure conformism through fashions and scandals, mass individualistically for the conformism of being the Other or being Another or for Otherness (massenindividualistisch für den Konformismus des Andersseins), with which, at the same time, integration and differentiation are taken care of and ensured.
S. 133 Culture in Mass Democracy as Difference as well as Indifference ... the internalisation of values and norms is no longer needed in order to integrate individuals into a community, polity or commonwealth (in the old sense of the Term). Order has become technological and because of that no longer needs a sense of duty [[as in the pre-Modern Technological world]]. “A bureaucracy collapses when the computers collapse, but this is just a computer problem and not a discipline problem.”
S. 133-134 individuals perform their functions without inner involvement or participation, i.e. in the sense of working outside of the set technological parameters ... which means that machines/robots eventually can take over up to all or at least many jobs ... = automation ...
S. 134 »Die ideelle Vergesellschaftung kann in der Massendemokratie allgemein und nichtssagend bleiben. Da ist nicht viel Ideologie im Sinne eines Gemeinwesens nötig. Massendemokratie kann nur schwer eine Republik sein im Sinne von »tua res agitur«. Es gibt nur noch wenig von dem, was in der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft Repräsentation hieß. Ein emphatischer Repräsentationsbegriff hat keinen Sinn mehr.« (“Ideational socialisation can in mass democracy remain general and meaningless, expressionless, not to be said [[i.e. there is no e.g. Virgin Mary Dogma which must be believed at all costs, though I would ask what is the Top-Down imposed “Anti-Racism”, “Anti-Sexism” and “Anti-Satanism” business? On the other hand, they are in-part “businesses” rather than an overall e.g. Virgin Mary “business” ... so FURTH’s point is that mass democracy is a BOTH a differentiated and in part integrated society in terms of quantities and doses which when compared to other societies are different, yet all societies qualitatively consists of a group/groups and individuals and elements of differentiation and elements of integration]]. There is not much ideology required in the sense of a community/polity/commonwealth [[which is relatively and comparatively homogeneous]]. Mass democracy can hardly be a republic in the sense of “tua res agitur” [[“tua res agitur” = it is a matter that concerns you = “nam tua res agitur, paries cum proximus ardet” = “you too are in danger when your neighbor's house is on fire” (Horace)]]. There is only still little left of what was called representation in bourgeois society [[when the member of parliament represented certain men of property – all with relative racial and cultural and religious cohesion (at least when compared to today’s mass societies)]]. An emphatic concept of representation no longer has any meaning [[since almost everything is “acted out” on the TV and Internet, conducted or guided/steered, so to speak, GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY, by the JOO cum Allies (Protestants, Papists, FeminoFaggotised CockSuckers, Atheists, Freaks, et al.]].”)
S. 134-135 rather than Faith and Truth ... the struggle is over Opinion ... Opinion in 19th century oligarchic bourgeois society was still connected to vital class and other forces in society trying to hold sway against other vital class and other forces e.g. (Remnants of Societas Civilis, Dictatorial) Conservatism vs. (Bourgeois Parliamentary) Liberalism vs. Social/Radical Democracy (Socialism, Communism) ...
S. 135-136 Bernard Berelson [[ANOTHER ??? !!! THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY FUCKING EVERYWHERE!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!]] = Reader in Public Opinion and Communication = the historical prerequisites are now met in order for the manipulation of the masses to succeed by manipulating their opinions: the aim of secularisation was to reduce all the imperatives of life to Opinions which meant that these imperatives were not the expression of absolute morality or Divine Law [[which means that JOOs and Allies of the ZIO-Excrement can GROSSLY DISPROPORITONATELY “convince” most, if not everyone, that e.g. “Anti-Racist” Self-Racist AUTO-GENOCIDE is “normal” and “good for them” ... HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND WHICH ALSO MEANS WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG, IT WAS PROTESTANT-PAPIST-SECULARISING CHRISTIANS AND LATER ATHEISTS WHICH COMBINED WITH THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND EUROPEAN IMPERIALISMS, THE SUPER-EXPLOITATIONS OF CHEAP (WHITE AND OTHER) LABOUR ETC. WHICH (CAUSALLY) LED TO THE INCREASING POLITICAL-CULTURAL GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE POWER OF JOOS AND ULTIMATELY TO THE FREAK-SHOW MASS-DEMOCRATIC MESS OF SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ZIO-USA ... GOOD LUCK TO EVERYONE, BUT I THINK EVERYONE IS FUCKED BY ABOUT 2100/2150 ...]]. If the secularisation succeeded, then those who steered and controlled minds, views and opinions (Meinungen), ruled the land.
S. 136 Edward Bernays, a nephew of Sigmund Freud [[ANOTHER SUPER JOO!!!]], was one of the first and most effective social engineers. He was an Atheist [[= A JOO!!!]] and feared that a world without God would end up in social chaos (“Er war Atheist und fürchtete, daß eine Welt ohne Gott in einem sozialen Chaos enden würde”) [[HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FURTH HUMOUR – LOVE IT!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]. The remedy, however, he sought in the manipulation of the masses by public relations. He characterised this technique of the formation of the opinion of the masses as the engineering of consent. In his book, Propaganda, published in 1928, the first chapter, “Organizing Chaos”, begins: “THE conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” [[HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANOTHER FUCKING JOO IN CONTROL !!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]
The promise of power contained in this program led to an alliance of co-operation between social scientists, media intellectuals and politicians.
S. 137 Through the use of all means of control/steering, starting from the techniques of public relations, to the perfection of opinion polls, via the film industry, right up to the mass media of all and any kind of forms, in the USA a social system has been created, which can be considered to be a model of mass democracy.
The transition from analogue MEDIA TV/Radio to Digital media and the Internet = it’s now more a question of controlling action and knowledge rather than opinions as now there is no longer a sovereign embodiment of power ... [[LOOK, THIS APPLIES IN PART, BECAUSE “ACTION AND KNOWLEDGE” WERE STILL PRESENT IN THE AGE OF “CONTROLLING OPINIONS”, AS “CONTROLLING OPINIONS” IS STILL PART OF TODAY’S SCENE (as is some kind of State embodying some kind of Power), AT LEAST IN PART – SO FURTH IS TALKING ABOUT DEGREES OF I.E. QUANTITATIVE (NOT QUALITATIVE) DIFFERENCES OR E.G. A DIFFERENT “RHYTHM” OR “DOSAGE” OF THE DISPERSAL OF FORMS OF POWER ETC. ... ]] ...
S. 137-138 “Because the network/plexus/mesh of veto groups constitutes a shapeless/formless power structure, in which it is difficult to distinguish between master/lord and servant, friend and foe” (= »Denn das Geflecht der Veto-Gruppen bildet eine gestaltlose Machtstruktur, in der es schwerfällt, zwischen Herr und Knecht, Freund und Feind zu unterscheiden«). [[WE CAN CLEARLY SEE THIS IN THE ON-GOING POWER STRUGGLES BETWEEN TRUMP AND HIS JOOs AGAINST THE ZIO-PSYCHOS OF (THE DEEP STATE AND OF) “ONE WORLD, GLOBAL VILLAGE, NO BORDERS”, MULTI-KULTI, FEMINO-FAGGOTISING, OTHERISING AND SATANISING) PSYCHO-NONSENSE ... EVERYONE IS FUCKING INSANE!!! I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE!!! BUT THE PSYCHO JOOS ARE MORE PSYCHO THAN ALL OF US, AND IF THE MORE REALISTIC JOOS AND TRUMP AND THE PROTESTANTS AND THE PAPISTS AND THE COCK-SUCKERS AND ATHEISTS WITH HALF A BRAIN DO NOT REIN IN THE NO-BRAIN PSYCHO JOOS, THEN HAN MAN OR RUS MAN OR ANOTHER MAN WILL JUST HAVE TO BLOW THE WHOLE FUCKING THING UP, WON’T HE?]]
S. 138 with TV etc. there was still a sense of transition between past and future ... now, though, a new present emerges, in which everything formerly past and all that has happened before, has its place in ever-expanding simultaneity.
No-one can (fully) control all the on-going reactions to reactions online etc. ...
S. 139 the filters of sensations, scandals and fashions only work up to a point in channeling thought etc. ...
»So verdeckt gerade auch der Humanismus das Komplexitätsproblem. Für ihn ist der Mensch das Maß aller Dinge und letztlich verantwortlich für das, was geschieht. Aber Komplexität heißt gerade nicht Zurechenbarkeit oder Zurechnungsfahigkeit. Indem auf einzelne zugerechnet wird, was sich systemisch ergeben hat, und indem die Betroffenen in die Verantwortung genommen werden, personalisiert man das Problem, und die Komplexitätsreduktion endet in einem Als-ob.« (“Humanism conceals the problem of complexity. For Humanism, Man is the measure of all things and ultimately responsible for what happens. But complexity does not mean accountability or the capacity to be of sound or at least composed mind. By attributing to individual persons what has systematically been produced, and by the people concerned taking responsibility, one personalises the problem, and the reduction of ends (up) in an As-if (= a legal fiction, or an assumption, a contingency, or making/giving the impression of, seeming as, or an as though ...).”)
S. 140 The Enlightenment with its Reason and History as Progress postulates reaches a total impasse ... The Future CANNOT be understood from the Past ...
The so-called anti-magic powers of science and technology of our civilisation purport to be beyond (having overcome) the magical world of fetish and ritual. In the shape/form of trends, repressed magic is now returning to civilization.
S. 140-141 younger generations hope for a kind of conflict-free utopia of endless, boundless opportunities ... global harmony, world society to replace the mere pluriverse of antagonistic societies ... but as with any technique/technology, the meaning remains secondary in the name of the function ...
technology functions without consensus and is open to any use ...
digital information technology with the delivery, supply and providing of (pieces of) information ... AT THE SAME TIME ... procures and obtains (pieces of) information ...
»Aber an dieser Einsicht gebricht es. Es stehen sich zwei Seiten der massenmedialen Verhaltenskontrolle gegenüber, einerseits das Bewirken von Meinungen und andererseits der faktische Vollzug der digitalisierten Informationstechnik, das heißt, die Meinungsmacht steht als Potentialität der Wirklichkeitsmacht faktischer technischer Entscheidungen gegenüber, und beides ist in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung durch die Illusion miteinander verbunden, daß sich von der Meinungsseite her die Entwicklung und Anwendung der Informationstechnologie steuern ließe. So ist zu befürchten, daß gerade im Namen eines emphatischen Kommunikationsbegriffes das Freiheitsrisiko einer totalen weltweiten Kontrolle der Menschen verkannt wird.«
(= “But in this insight, is the shortcoming. There are two sides to the mass media control of behaviour: on the one hand, the bringing about of and giving rise to opinions and, on the other hand, the actual execution of digitised information technology; which means that the power of opinion faces as potentiality the power of the reality of factual technical decisions, and both are in the public perception connected with each other by the illusion that the development and application of information technology could be steered and controlled by the point of view of opinion (or: by the opinion page). Thus, it is to be feared that precisely in the name of an emphatic concept of communication, the risk to freedom of the total world-wide control of humans is misunderstood.”) [[THIS TO ME, MEANS THAT IN THEIR INSATIABLE LUST FOR POWER, THE PSYCHO-ZIOS (JOOS) OF ZIO-USA DO NOT KNOW WHERE TO STOP (UNLESS THEY ARE IN THE MINORITY OF THE MORE REALISTIC ONES, WHICH PROTESTANT-PAPIST-ATHEIST MAN HAS TO ALLY HIMSELF WITH, IF SOMETHING OF THE “WEST” IS TO SURVIVE) ... AND HAN MAN OR APE MAN OR RUS MAN OR ANOTHER MAN WILL PUT A DEFINITE STOP TO ANY FURTHER UTOPIAN FANTASIES ... THAT’S FOR SURE ... A MATTER OF TIME ... ]]
*
A GREEK (HELLEN, ROMAN) IN PHANTASY LAND – A POEM
FOR IN MY DREAMS MY TRIBE IS IN COMMAND
OF AT LEAST MOST OF OUR HISTORICAL TERRITORIES
FROM SOUTHERN ITALY TO ASIA MINOR, CYPRUS AND PONTUS
WITH OUR WOMEN BEARING – EVERY ONE – MANY CHILDREN
AND NO JOO WOULD BE ALLOWED ANY POWER
NOT EVEN ONE IOTA
AND WE WOULD HAVE RIGHTS OF PASSAGE TO THE LANDS HOLY
AND WE SHALL ALL BE WRITING IN THE POLYTONIC;
FLUENT IN ALL VERSIONS OF THE LANGUAGE
PRODUCING VERSE ALWAYS IN MEMORY OF HOMER
WORSHIPPING TOGETHER WITH RUS MAN, OUR DEAR VIRGIN
AND THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY
WOULD NEVER DARE RAISE ITS HEAD
OVER OUR TERRITORY – EVER
*
Regarding/About/On Mass Democracy (II) In memory of Panagiotis Kondylis by Peter Furth (GOD REST AND BLESS HIS SOUL ... AND DON’T FORGET, THESE NOTES ARE BY A TOTALLY INSANE CRAZY MADMAN, SO YOU NEED TO READ AND STUDY THE LATE AND PART-GREAT PETER FURTH’S TEXT TO KNOW WHAT HE ACTUALLY WROTE UNLESS HE IS QUOTED “” ETC. ... ) ...
S. 145 WW1 (World War One) was a real SHOCK and the Progress Ideology/Ideologies of the 19th century connected to capitalism and bourgeois society were seriously now challenged by Socialism, Communism, and then Fascism, National Socialism ... with an anti-fascist alliance emerging between Socialists and Liberals reflecting Western “middle of the Road” mass democracy ...
YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED HERE, JU-DAS
YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED HERE, JU-DAS.
YOU HAVE YOUR WICKED PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETIES
AND I HAVE MY OWN PRIVATE EXCLUSIONARY ZONE
WHICH THE WHOLE WORLD CAN SEE
AS I POINT THE BONE AT YOU,
REPRESENTATIVE OF MAMMON
REPRESENTATIVE OF SATAN
SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY
UP-ROOTING, DE-ROOTING ANIMAL
ZIO-EXCREMENTAL RUBBISH ...
YOUR TURN WILL COME
AND I SHALL ALWAYS POINT AT YOU THE BONE
FOR I AM MY ANCESTORS AND MY VILLAGE
DEAD OR ALIVE
(WE ARE DEAD)
DEATH TO THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY!!!
DEATH TO SATAN!!!!!
*
S. 145-146 After fascism was defeated, the “liberal” in effect more economically developed SEA POWERS (USA-UK-FRANCE-JAPAN) and their ridiculous (JOO et al.) theory of “totalitarianism” [[IF SOMETHING IS TOTALITARIAN, DICKHEADS, HOW COME IT IS CAPABLE OF BREAKING DOWN ... ??? ABSOLUTELY FUCKED-IN-THE-HEAD CRETINS ...]] eventually overcame the Eurasian Power of the Socialist/Communist Camp and so it seemed c. 1991 that Capitalism and “Liberalism” were in the CLEAR for some kind of FUCKING 1000 YEAR ZIO-JUDAS-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY REICH ...
S. 146 And so a capitalistic-democratic “End of History” was proclaimed (FUCK! ... A LOT OF DRUGS MUST HAVE BEEN IN CIRCULATION IN THE 1990s ... )
And even more hilarious was the Declaration by RETARDED JOOS, COCKSUCKERS, FEMINISTS, AND ASSORTED FRUIT LOOPS OF AAAAAAAAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“THE END OF IDEOLOGIES”/ “END OF GREAT/GRAND NARRATIVES” ... YEAH SURE, GOOD ONE, WHATEVER YOU SAY, RETARD ...
AND SO ...
AND SO ...
“THE END OF IDEOLOGIES” WAS DECLARED
ALONG WITH “THE END OF HISTORY”
AND AFTER THE MODERN
THE POST
OF “THE END OF THE GREAT AND GRAND
NARRATIVES” ...
AND THE JAPS WHO WERE AMERICANS
AND THE CHINESE WHO WERE AMERICANS
AND THE JOOS WHO WERE AMERICANS
AND THE LEZZOS WHO WERE AMERICANS
AND THE FAGGOTS WHO WERE AMERICANS
AND THE MUSULMEN WHO WERE AMERICANS
AND THE HINDOOS WHO WERE AMERICANS
WERE ALL AMERICANS
AND, SO, THEY THOUGHT
“WHY NOT MAKE THE WHOLE WORLD AMERICAN”
AFTER OUR OWN IMAGE
SO THAT JOOS
(THE ZIO-EXCREMENTAL FILTH OF JU-DAS AND
SATAN, I.E. THE MAMMON FAECES OF SATANISM (PRIMITIVE
SECRET SOCIETY LUCIFERISM) AND THE
ABSOLUTELY ULTRA-UGLY VILE INFINITELY DISGUSTING
VOMIT
SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY
(BANKING, HIGH FINANCE, CORPORATE, TRADING)
VOMIT)
COULD GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY
CONTRIBUTE TO “RULING” THE WHOLE WORLD
IN THE NAME OF “HUMAN RIGHTS”
AND WHATEVER OTHER NONSENSE
A JOO AND HIS PROTESTANT, PAPIST, ATHEIST, AND HOMO-
FEMINO-FAGGOTISED FRIENDS
AND FELLOW-RETARDS COULD COME UP WITH ...
AND SO ...
HAN MAN DREAMED THE DREAM OF DENG
(IF U GO TO TRANFA DA PRODUCSIO TO MEE
WHAT DA FUC U THINK WILL BEE THE END OF THE STOREE
DUM FUCKIN WHITE DEVI MAN?!!!)
AND APE MAN IS WAITING TO GO APE ...
GOOD LUCK WITH ALL OF THAT ...
VERY INTELLIGENT, “HIGH VERBAL IQ”, MULTI-KULTI
DIE-VERSITY ONE PIECE OF SHIT GLOBAL EXCREMENT PEOPLE ...
*
S. 147 And P.K.’s Der Niedergang der bürgerlichen Denk- und Lebensform was written as Communism collapsed and The New World Order was proclaimed by the ZIO-SATANISTS (JOOs) and their MANY ALLIES in the now DEAD West, still called the “West” ...
AND the FEELING was widespread that »Wirklichkeit (hat) ihren Bildungsprozeß vollendet« (Hegel) (“Reality had brought to an end/completed its process of formation, education, cultivation, learning and development”) AAAAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“With mass democracy, we have the first global social formation before us, which indeed does not signify the end of history, but definitely signifies the end of the European New Times ... ”
S. 148 From the bourgeois supra-individual normative authorities like Reason, Nature, History to the Atomisation of the Social as the detaching of individuals from substance-related or supra-individual binding/ties in favour of unlimited and unrestricted flexibility and the aptitude or suitability for being the ultimate constitutive unity of a global, i.e., unrestricted, unbound [[ZIO/JUDAS]] mobile [[SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY-ZIO-COST-DEVIL-EVIL-EVIL-DEVIL-LUCIFER-MAMMON-ZIO-EXTREME HATE-DIE-VERSIFY-MULTI-KULTI-FREAK-SHOW-EXCREMENT-FEMINOFAGGOTISED-POO-FAECES-DUNG-APE-ANOMIE-VOMIT]] society.
S. 149 Re: the term “mass democracy” ... “mass” means the quantum-like substrate of atomised individuals and “democracy” stands for the functional order of this substrate ... Massendemokratie ist ein sprechender Begriff, insofern weder Volk, Nation oder Klasse die Gestalt des Politischen bestimmen. Das Soziale, das der Politik gegenübersteht und ihr Legitimität gibt, existiert nur als statistische Größe, deren Repräsentation über Quoten und Umfragen festgestellt wird (= “Mass democracy is an expressive/eloquent/convincing/graphic concept, in so far as neither Folk, Nation or Class determine the shape/form of The Political. The Social, which faces Politics and gives it legitimacy, exists only as a statistical magnitude, whose representation is ascertained by ratings and polls or surveys.”) [[CRAZY MAN ADDS: A KEY ASPECT OF THE “DEMOCRACY” IN “MASS DEMOCRACY” IS REFERENCE TO THE WHOLE OF SOCIAL ORGANISATION, NOT JUST THE POLITY AND GOVERNMENTAL “OPERATIONS”, AS COMPARED IDEAL-TYPICALLY TO OLIGARCHIC BOURGEOIS LIBERALISM (AND SOCIETAS CIVILIS/LATE FEUDALISM) WHERE THE “DEMOCRACY” IN PARTICULAR REFERS TO THE HISTORICALLY UNHEARD OF CAPACITY FOR SOCIAL MOBILITY SO THAT E.G. A HOMOSEXUAL HINDOO CAN BECOME THE NOMINAL (BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW WHO REALLY GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY RUNS AND OR INFLUENCES THINGS “BEHIND THE SCENES” PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY-MASONIC-MAMMON-LIKE) NUMERO UNO OF A FORMERLY CATHOLIC COUNTRY WHICH LARGELY LOST ITS NATIVE LANGUAGE CENTURIES AGO ... THIS IS ABSOLUTE JOO-ZIO SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY EXCREMENT MADNESS WHICH CAN ONLY END UP IN TOTAL JU-DAS HELL FOR EVERYONE ... ]]
S. 150 For P.K. the “mass” is not like in the Old Left (and Old/Current Right) cultural criticism ... but absolutely neutral signifying actual “mass” since anomie – as has been proven by the relative hitherto success of ZIO-USA societies of “The West” – has been more or less, overall, been dealt with by access to societal wealth ...
Instead of rebellion and class struggle/war, we get Mass Consumption and Mass Media (i.e. FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO LOBOTOMISATION, ZIO-COST WORSHIP, FREAK-SHOW BRAIN WASHING, OTHERISATION, AUTOGENOCIDE, FEMINO-FAGGOTISATION ETC.)
S. 151 Mass Tourism e.g. unites the formerly hostile masses ... no longer a people, a nation, a class uniting people ... so the political collective is termed by P.K. as “mass democracy” ...
S. 151-152 CLASSIC FURTH/P.K. QUOTE TIME!!! »Die Massendemokratie steht für den historischen Kompromiß als Abschluß der Kämpfe um den Nachlaß der bürgerlichen Revolution. Das, was die Massendemokratie zusammenhält, ist ein melting pot aus den historisch nicht dementierten ideologischen Resten von Liberalismus und Sozialismus. Die Bedingung dafür, daß es zu diesem historischen Kompromiß kommen konnte und dafür, daß er hält, ist die gesamtgesellschaftlich wirksame Oberwindung der Knappheit der Güter durch die Konvergenz von Massenproduktion und Massenkonsum: »Das zentrale Merkmal der Massendemokratie, das sie von allen früheren Gesellschaftsformationen unterscheidet und zu einen geschichtlichen Novum macht, ist die Überwindung der Knappheit der Güter. Es kann zwar eine Massengesellschaft, nicht aber eine Massendemokratie westlichen Typs geben, wenn jener Überfluß an materiellen Gütern fehlt, der eine quasi automatische Bindung des Begriffs des Bürgers (als Citoyen) an den des Konsumenten bewirkt.« (Panajotis Kondylis: Der Niedergang der bürgerlichen Denk- und Lebensform. Die liberale Moderne und die massendemokratische Postmoderne. Weinheim 1991, S. 188.)« (= “Mass democracy stands for historical compromise as the conclusion/close of the struggles around the estate of the bourgeois revolution. That which holds mass democracy together is a melting pot out of the historically not denied or disclaimed ideological remnants (remainders, leftovers) of liberalism and socialism. The condition for that (i.e. the achievement of mass democracy), that it/things could come to this historical compromise, and regarding that, maintaining it, is the overall societally effective overcoming of the scarcity of goods through the convergence of mass production and mass consumption: “the central feature of mass democracy, which distinguishes it from all earlier social formations, and makes it or turns it into a historical novum, is the overcoming of the scarcity (shortage, dearth) of goods. There can indeed be a mass society, but not a mass democracy of a Western type, if any surplus of material goods is lacking, which brings about and effects a quasi-automatic binding or tying of the concept of the burgher/freeman/(middle class) citizen (as citoyen) to that (concept) of the consumer.” (S. 188 German ed. of P.K.’s Decline ...))
S. 152-153 The scarcity of money re: the overcoming of the scarcity of goods has plagued the whole history of capitalism ... so financial policy from the New Deal and Bretton Woods onwards meant (post WW2 victory) a world-wide monetary system in favour of the USA [[= SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY, UP-ROOT, DE-ROOT, OTHERISING, CHEAP LABOUR, DEVIL-EVIL-EVIL-DEVIL JU-DAS ZIO-COST FEMINOFAGGOTISING AUTO-GENOCIDAL FREAK SHOW ZIO-USA]]. Dollar as reserve currency, FED’s obligation to buy govt. bonds ... and the USA with an almost inexhaustible source of income ... and [[ZIO-USA]] American mass democracy was triumphant ... with the subsidisation of almost all kinds of income and the alignment of the purchasing power of the population with the economy’s production possibilities ... US Government monetary privilege = USA consumption as the essential motor/driving force of the world economy ... [[+ Military Might and Sea Power Dominance + ACCESS to Primary Resources and TRADE etc. = KEY]]
S. 153 It is to be feared that a failure or breakdown of the American monetary system would mean the end of mass democracy worldwide ...
The overcoming of scarcity/shortage/dearth is for Kondylis, the decisive epoch-related criterion = reminiscent of Marx’s distinction between pre-history and actual history. Kondylis’s ironic comparison of mass democracy and classless society alludes to this.
S. 153-154 [[MadMan says: ironic because it can’t possibly succeed over the long run ... it’ll definitely break down ... eventually ... ]] ... so, from Marxism, P.K. keeps the notion of struggle and the importance of relations of production etc. = historical materialism without any eschatology and a political Party Vanguard ... + with the economism being ultimately constrained by politics, and ideology applying all-round ...
S. 154 Ideological opponents, Liberalism and Socialism, are connected by the abolition of Want ... [[SO THE USUAL ZIO-USA BULLDUST ABOUT LIBERALISM AND SOCIALISM BEING POLAR OPPOSITES IS ABSOLUTE BULLDUST, JUST LIKE COMMUNISM AND FASCISM ARE NOT POLAR OPPOSITES ... ALL MAJOR MODERN ERA IDEOLOGIES HAVE OVERLAPPING CONCEPTUAL SPHERES ... EVEN CONSERVATISM AND COMMUNISM/FASCISM ETC. ... I’VE GONE OVER ALL OF THIS MANY TIMES THROUGHOUT THIS SITE, AND I’M NOT DOING IT AGAIN HERE ...]]
S. 155 To both camps (ideological Liberalism and Socialism), mass democracy appears to be an uncompleted project ... but also un-passable ...
S. 156 Consumption takes the place of ideology (in the old sense of reflecting real, tangible class-social interests as in Feudal-related Conservatism, Oligarchic Bourgeois Capitalistic Liberalism, and Socialism/Radical-Material Democracy) and public/community spirit, thereby making political identities and differences blurred and agile [[re: all kinds of contra-naturam ZIO-FREAK SHOW Full-Spectrum ZIO-LOBOTOMISED ZOMBIES]]
What are the consequences for democracy when the consumer takes over the role of the citoyen? How does this change the relevance and structure of ideology?
S. 156-157 In mass democracy, it’s not a matter anymore of the subjects and objects of dominance/dominant authority, of The People/Folk and their Representatives because the old problem of democracy in respect of the transference of Will (as expounded unlike no-one else by Robert Michels), is more or less irrelevant and without an object in mass democracy ...
S. 157 Paramount now in mass democracy is accumulation AND distribution and legitimation in regard to mass democracy’s politics ... [[so the political obtains an economic nature on a mass scale which has nothing to do with actual/real democracy of the Hellenic world, and attempts at such a democracy (in whatever variants) in e.g. (post-)Renaissance Italy, Switzerland and nineteenth century America/NON-ZIO USA of a society transitioning (in historical terms) rapidly to a mass society and then to a mass democracy ...]]
S. 158 In Schumpeter's model of democracy, the formation/development of the Will does not start from the masses, but rather from the proposals of the elites, between whom a choice is made on the compromise between accumulation and distribution.
S. 158-159 wealth production in capitalistic industrial society now means that the Will of the people is absolutely irrelevant because the elites [[JOOs and allies]] are concerned with the issues between accumulation and distribution, i.e. the economic nature of the political ...
S. 159 The Here and Now of this wealth takes its inner force and legitimation from the utopian future reference of political will ... [[i.e. all political will is ZIO-PROTESTANT-PAPIST-ATHEIST-HOMOSEXUAL-MASONIC-MAFIA-PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETIES-“managed” to look towards continual “economic growth/prosperity” etc. ... so “the people” voting are not at all voting on any proposals which could take things in another direction ... SO THEY ARE JUST MASS-MEDIA FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISED ZOMBIES ...]]
How do freedom and equality stand, when the consumer takes on the role of the citoyen?
S. 160 Erst über die Gleichheit wird aus der Freiheit Gerechtigkeit = Only via equality does freedom become justice [[so there is equality [[cum envy motive]] in the sense there is no formal/legal class or caste “system” and that everyone gets to CONSUME as a CONSUMER, but of course massive material and other power inequalities are “all over the shop” and GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY in favour of the MAMMON-ZIO-JOO-HEEBROO-Excrement and Allies ... Protestants, Papists, CockSuckers, Assorted FreakShow NutJobs and Jooish Psycho-Paths ... = too many to name, I’ve named some of them passim ...]]
S. 161-162 Freedom in a society programmed for the benefit of [[consumer]] happiness looks to co-existing with equality based on the motive of envy so that the Whole (society) is not threatened. The (OLD, REAL) Democracy of Freedom contrasted to Equality becomes in Mass Democracy a functional tandem of Synergy ... [[because here we are dealing with mass consumer FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISED-ZOMBIE-FREAK SHOW-DIE-VERSIFIED-EXCREMENT-MULTI-KULTI-JOO-HORROR SOCIETY, AND NOT RELATIVELY SMALL-SCALE COMMUNITIES WHERE EVERYONE KNOWS EVERYONE, BEING OF THE SAME OR SIMILAR OR ASSIMILATED-AND OR CO-EXISTENT-CAPABLE RACE/RELIGION/CULTURE ETC. ...]]
S. 162 Under conditions of mass democracy, Freedom is assigned to the side of Accumulation ... and ... Equality to the side of Distribution and Legitimation.
Freedom as a value is needed for the realisation of a self-image in which Authenticity and Self-Realisation have replaced Autonomy and Self-Responsibility, and Equality is supposed to guarantee the security of individual welfare and protection against discrimination.
S. 163 The natural barriers to equality are declared to be inapplicable [[e.g. notwithstanding that there are REAL reasons of nature at play for the NBA to be full of Jumping Blacks, the best Male Football Players being FAR SUPERIOR to Women “soccer players” and for mother-tongue speakers of Greek usually (not necessarily always) being relatively (compared to Black Negros) White ... that’s all ignored because JOOie SAID SO ... OK, JOOie, go and Tell Han Man that Black Africans can be Chinese en masse (or at all), and I don’t think that’s really going to Wash in China is it now JOOie? And whilst we’re at it, JOOie, why does not the SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY COMPOUND AND BUNKER OPEN UP ITS BORDERS TO SIX/6 MILLION BLACK AFRICAN KAFFIRS OR MUHOOMUTS TO BECOME NEW “ISRAELIS” SINCE ALL HUMANS HAVE EQUAL VALUE??? WHAT WAS THAT JOOie? YOU’RE NOT ANSWERING, JOOIE ... I WONDER WHY ... I WONDER ... BUT THE DEEP FRY WILL COME FOR YOU, JOOie ... NO BE LONG ... APE MAN OR HAN MAN OR ANOTHER MAN WILL DEAL WITH YOU ... MATTER OF TIME ... NO BE LONG ... (SAY, BY 2150!) ... ]] Hence, re: questions of nature-related and biologically-related differences between humans, which obviously exist, Equality trumps Freedom in the way [[ZIO-USA]] Mass Democracy operates ...
S. 164-165 Human dignity is no longer connected to an AURA relating to certain personal and or class characteristics, but is deemed inherent in everyone and the State/Society in Mass Democracy is supposed to achieve it for all, even though everyone “has it (human dignity)” as if by “nature” or “naturally” [[because JOOie and Friends at the UN/Zio-USA say so ... even though human nature does not exist because everything is a “social construct” AAAAAAAA- HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]
S. 165 The ambivalence of human dignity also impacts upon tolerance ...
»Dem Ziel nach geht es der Toleranz um die Sicherung friedlicher Beziehungen unter den Menschen, ihre Durchführung aber verbindet sich mit Aggressivität und Feindseligkeit« (= “The aim as regards tolerance is the securing of friendly relations amongst humans/people, however its realisation, execution or implementation is connected with aggressivity and enmity”). AAAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHA ... because people are not just humans but also can be Christians, JOOs, MuHooMAts or Pagans, Communists or “Liberals” so there are points where some will not want to “co-mingle” with “all” of their “fellow humans” ...
S. 166 and if one is not just a mere “human” and clings to a particular national, religious, ideological and or other characteristic, then one becomes the foe of humanity or an “Un-Human/Non-Human” ... given, strictly speaking, under “we are all humans”, everyone is only a human and not also something else ...
“If, on the other hand, Tolerance refers or relates normatively to the Particular and the particularities amongst men, then another – for it – likewise fatal alternative arises. On the one hand, it (Tolerance) threatens to be swallowed up by the quarrel of particularities [[YOU BE TOLERANT OF ME! NO, YOU BE TOLERANT OF ME! ETC. ETC. ETC..]]. If it (Tolerance), however, on the other hand, wants to hold onto the aim of securing peace, for it, only the consequence remains to set itself as the yardstick and to demand from the unruly particularities that Tolerance be answered with Tolerance. But all those who in relation to that, do not want that or are not in the position/situation for that, Tolerance applies as a re-educating foe [[SO, TOLERANCE IS INTOLERANT OF THOSE WHO ARE TOLERANT OF THEMSELVES BUT NOT TOLERANT OF OTHERS – AAAAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]. »Wenn sich hingegen die Toleranz auf das Partikulare und die Besonderheiten unter den Menschen normativ bezieht, dann entsteht für sie eine andere, aber gleichfalls fatale Alternative. Einerseits droht sie im Streit der Besonderheiten unterzugehen. Wenn sie aber andererseits an dem Ziel der Friedenssicherung festhalten will, bleibt ihr nur die Konsequenz, sich selbst als Maßstab zu setzen und von den widerspenstigen Besonderheiten zu verlangen, Toleranz mit Toleranz zu beantworten. Alle diejenigen aber, die dazu nicht willens oder in der Lage sind, gelten der Toleranz als umzuerziehende Feinde.«
S. 166 The universalism of human rights CAN ONLY be an abstract principle [[unless there is a world state enforcing them]]. In reality “human rights” cannot overcome cultural relativism ... e.g. state “x” provides these rights to these people, and state “y” these ... etc. (or: Saudi Arabian law is quite different to Chinese law and American law etc.) ...
S. 167 The materiality as concretisation of Equality will never rid itself of the shadow of Scarcity ... so there will never be human rights as all people to have equal access to material wealth and comforts ... (there are in fact no human rights as equality of conditions and opportunities/chances ... let alone materially understood human rights) ...
S. 168 “Both sides contain their opposite in themselves. Universalism must occur or appear as the adaptation to the relative conditions of its realisation as relativism. Relativism, on the other hand, must be legitimised as a general norm in order to assert itself/be asserted. This contradiction, however, by no means paralyses human rights ideology, but rather makes up precisely its dynamics” (= »Beide Seiten enthalten in sich selber ihren Gegensatz. Der Universalismus muß in Anpassung an die relativen Bedingungen seiner Realisierung als Relativismus auftreten. Der Relativismus hingegen muß sich, um sich zu behaupten, als generelle Norm legitimieren. Dieser Widerspruch lähmt jedoch die Menschenrechtsideologie keineswegs, sondern macht gerade ihre Dynamik aus«).
IF SOMEONE HAS HAD ...
IF SOMEONE HAS HAD
THE FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMY
WHY WOULD YOU WASTE YOUR TIME?
WOULD YOU BOTHER TALKING TO SOMEONE ON DRUGS
WHO THINKS THAT WORKING FOR A LIVING IS BAD?
THE SOCIAL FORMATION CURRENTLY IN COMMAND
MIGHT GO ON FOR QUITE A WHILE YET
SO WHY WASTE YOUR TIME WITH THE FULL-SPECTRUM
ZIO-LOBOTOMISED, WHEN IN JUST A RELATIVELY VERY SHORT
WHILE/TIME YOU MIGHT BE AS GOOD AS DEAD?
FOR THOSE OF US WHO BELONGED AND STILL SPIRITUALLY
BELONG TO THE WEST
(OR TO ROME IN THE CASE OF ME)
OUR TIME IS UP
NOW COMES THE APE
AND WHAT THE HAN MAN MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT DO
WITH THE MONEY TREE.
FOR EVEN IF THE ZIO-STATE OF THE USA
GETS IN PLACE VASSAL STATES IN
PERSIA, RUSSIA AND CHINA
EVENTUALLY THE JUNGLE OF SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY CHAOS
WILL SHAKE, SHAKE, SHAKE SO MUCH
THAT ADOLF’S OR UNCLE JOE’S OR MAO MAN’S REGIMES WILL
APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN SO MUCH THE KINDER.
IF SOMEONE HAS HAD
THE FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMY
WHY WOULD YOU WASTE YOUR TIME?
THE WEST IS OVER ANYWAY,
AND THERE’S TOO MUCH CULTURAL STUFF LEFT OVER TO ENJOY
AND NOWHERE NEAR ENOUGH TIME.
*
S. 168 (CONT.) Those who feel excluded from the path of taking part (and thus concretising the principle of Equality) in world wealth take the field with their cultural peculiarity in order to push through their own claims vis-à-vis the globalisation of wealth.
S. 168-169 The prospect of a clash of cultures is not as threatening as the underlying possibility that, on the way to world society, the economisation of politics (i.e. making politics a matter of economic growth and redistribution etc.) connected with human rights universalism reaches its limits, in the face of which the economism must yield to a biologisation of the political (i.e. of turning The Political into a matter of biological survival) [[THIS DOES NOT MEAN TOMORROW MORNING, BUT E.G. BY 2100 OR 2150, AND SINCE NO ADULT ALIVE TODAY WILL BE ALIVE AND WELL IN c. 2150, CRAZY MAN CAN MAKE THE ASSERTION AND “GET AWAY WITH IT” ... THAT’S WHY P.K. NEVER GAVE TIME FRAMES ... ]].
S. 169 Struggles over energy, air, water (without ideological mediation) become biopolitical ...
S. 170 The ideology typical of mass democracy is uniform/united/unified and speaks for the whole of society without turning towards and addressing any particular carrier or addressee (such as the proletariat, or the nation (or the bourgeosie or the feudal estates) etc.) ...
“The technologically determined order of society relieves individuals of their inner participation in the community/polity/commonwealth and integrates them instead through the provision of external rules and regulations of conformity.”
S. 170-171 Political Correctness is indifferent to the separation of the public sphere and privacy, so that it is difficult to determine whether Political Correctness is a politicisation of privacy or a privatisation of politics.
YOU DON’T FUCKING TALK TO JOOs ...
YOU DON’T FUCKING TALK TO JOOs
IF YOU’RE NOT INTO SPIRITUAL SUMBMISSION
BECAUSE
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO FUCKING POINT
UNLESS YOUR DOING NECESSARY BUSINESS
(DA JOO ONLY DO DA FLESH, NO SPIRIT ... BUT ...
BUSINESS IS BUSINESS)
MAMMON’S MESH, WEB AND NET
IS SO WIDESPREAD
SO THICK AND INTERTWINED
GOING BACK NOW SO MANY CENTURIES IN TIME
THAT WHEN DA JOO FALLS
ALL OF WHAT REMAINS
OF THE WEST FALLS
JOO
AND THAT IS WHY UNTIL I HAVE A DEATH CERTIFICATE
I WON’T BE WASTING ANY TIME TALKING TO DA JOOs
(UNLESS I'M DOING NECESSARY BUSINESS
BECAUSE BUSINESS IS BUSINESS)
SINCE I AM IN MOURNING FOR MY OWN TRIBE
AND ONLY CAN
POINT
TO DA JOO (AND PROTESTANT, PAPIST, ATHEIST, FEMINO-
FAGGOTISED (HOMOSEXUAL) MAMMONIST)
THE
BONE.
*
S. 171 Richard Sennett’s formula “Tyranny of Intimacy” applies to the achievement of Political Correctness in forming the mass-democratic mentality (see S. 90 above: = end of bourgeois public sphere when it was separate from the private sphere, so that now up to “everything” is policed in terms of language used etc.) ...
S. 172 The conformist force/strength of hypocrisy is as effective in Political Correctness as in any of the older ideologies since the Enlightenment ...
S. 173 The assumption behind Human Dignity and Political Correctness is “Man is of his Nature, Good” (= Rousseau) [[when “everyone” knows that Primitive Secret Society JOOs and their Protestant, Papist, Atheist and Homosexual Allies are The Representatives of Mammon-Satan and Inherently Evil ...]]
S. 173-174 Philanthropic morality, as the core of the mass-democratic mindset, not only establishes relationships as to value (i.e. value relationships), but also generates them through the anticipatory perspectivity of good will [[SO IF JOOS WITH GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE ACCESS TO MONEY FOR THE USUAL HISTORICAL AND PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY REASONS, HAVE MORE MONEY, THEY CAN “PLAY IT” AS “GREAT PHILANTHROPISTS AND ZIO-COST SATAN-TENT “VICTIMS”, NOTWITHSTANDING THAT THEY GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY PARTICIPATE IN THE SUPER-EXPLOITATION OF CHEAP LABOUR OVERSEAS OR “AT HOME” ... ]]
S. 174 As long as humanitarianism is the leading ideology, we know that the hierarchical differences between men are unbearable, but at the same time inevitable/unavoidable and indispensable/essential [[SO THAT’S THE VERY “BIG PICKLE” THAT DOES NOT GO AWAY. YOU WANT ALL THE WEALTH FOR YOURSELF, AND YOU WANT THE RABBLE TO ACCEPT YOU HAVE ALL THAT WEALTH, WHILST YOU PREACH THAT WE ARE “ALL THE SAME” ... OK, IF YOU SAY SO ...]]
S. 175 Traditional roles between people now frowned upon or “outlawed” etc..
S. 175-176 Since the Enlightenment all anthropological differences incompatible with egalitarian mass culture have been neutralised or discredited e.g. the difference between the sacred and the profane crowd/multitude, the difference between the sage/Wise Man and the profanum vulgus/common masses, between heroes, poets, eminent culture, and the crowd/multitude striving for immediate self-realization ... what has been left is that whilst humans are “born the same” some are more gifted than others etc. [[WHICH ESSENTIALLY AMOUNTS TO MORE JOO-ZIO-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY BULLCRAP, BECAUSE IF WE’RE ALL THE SAME WHY DOESN’T ISRAEL OPEN UP ITS BORDERS TO THE LOVE OF SIX/6 MILLION BLACK AFRICANS OR MOHHAMENDAN BROWN AND OR ASIATIC KAFFIRS? THE ONLY THING THAT JOOS AND THEIR SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ALLIES CARE ABOUT IS FUCKING UP THE WHOLE WORLD IN THE BIG SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ZIO-COST MIX OF UNENDING EVIL MAMMON-JU-DAS HATE ... AT LEAST IT’LL EVENTUALLY CATCH UP WITH THEM, AS THEY GET EATEN ALIVE WHEN THEIR TIME COMES ... AND COME IT WILL ... ]]
S. 176-177 As soon as the thought-intellectual means were provided by post-modernism [[i.e. JOO-REE-DA De-Construct everything about White Christian Men, in particular, but DO NOT TOUCH GROSSLY DISPROPOROTIONATE ACCUMULATIONS, CONCENTRATIONS AND CRYSTAL(LLISATION)S OF JOOISH/ZIO FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH = THE JOO-REE-DA PROGRAMME OF FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION, OTHERISATION, FEMINOFAGGOTISATION, FREAKIFICATION, JUNGLEFICATION, AND ZIO-COST APE WORSHIP ETC. = VERY SICK STUFF AND A SURE SIGN A CIVILISATION IS AT ITS END ...]], they [[I.E. THE ZIO-JOO PSYCHOPATH SICKOS AND THEIR RETARDED ALLIES ON DRUGS ETC.]] set about interpreting the otherness of humans differently. The differences that were present were replaced by made differences ... [[= EVIL TALMUDIC JOO/HEE-BROO/ZIO PSYCHOPATHS + ALLIES TURNING EVERYTHING UPSIDE DOWN ON THE BASIS OF KONSUM AND HEDONISMUS AND DRUGS AND FEMINOFAGGOTISM AND DEEP-TV-UNI-MASS MEDIA-FULL-SPECTRUM ZIOCOST LOBOTOMISATION WHEREBY THE ATOMISED, APEFIED, OTHERISED ZOMBIES AGREE TO THEIR OWN SELF-GENOCIDE]]
S. 177 Under conditions of mass democracy/ZIO-USA style incl. self-realisation BULLSHIT of KONSUM and HEDONISMUS and DRUGS you “differ” without making a difference [[to the relations of Power which GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY favour ZIO-JOO Excrement (subjectively seen as a matter of Taste re: objective facts]]
S. 178 According to its ideological image/picture of itself, mass democracy has left the tendency of forms of conflict of imperialism and the class struggle behind. ... It is not enough to rebuild the deviations from the basic humanitarian norm in the sense of social engineering with the help of social and educational policy. They (the said deviations) need to be understood more deeply and combated in regard to another status, one that is not at all available to humanitarian morals, that of enmity [[= SOUNDS LIKE A JOOISH RAT ... ONLY A JOO OR A NON-JOOISH RETARD WOULD TRY AND CONVINCE YOU THAT CONFLICT/ENMITY HAS OR CAN BE ELIMINATED, WHILST THE SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY TRIBE ACCUMULATES GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH ON A DIVIDE AND RULE CHEAP LABOUR UP-ROOT DE-ROOT OTHERISING FEMINOFAGGOTISING ZIO-COST HEEBROO-EXCREMENTAL TALMUDIC-FULL SPECTRUM ZIO-ZOMBIE LOBOTOMY BASIS ETC.]]
S. 179 The Satanic Circus Monkey JOO and Allies under ZIO-USA have succeeded = FACT to turn water into piss, and piss into water, because what poses as “right” thinking today has absolutely nothing do with actual European conservatism but reflects the ZIO-USA SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY AGENDA OF MAMMONISING THE WHOLE WORLD OUT OF EXISTENCE BY INCREASING LEVELS OF ANOMIE AND CHAOS AND CRIME TO SUCH LEVELS THAT NOTHING WILL BE SAVED ...
+ “Mankind/Humanity” introduced into political rhetoric etc.. The concept of humanity can as a Supra-Concept not be turned into a counter-concept by the particularities grasped under it/“humanity” as Supra-Concept ... = ALL THIS IS JUST ZIO-JOOISH-HEEBROO-ZIOCOST UNENDING EVIL HATE “DIVIDE AND RULE, DIVIDE AND CONQUER” MULTI-KULTI OBFUSCATION AND CHAOSISATION-FREAKIFICATION-OTHERISATION-FEMINOFAGGOTISATION-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEYISATION...
S. 179-180 Denn Toleranz galt der Aufklärung, je älter und erfolgreicher sie wurde, nicht als ein relatives Prinzip des Ausgleichs und der Mäßigung, nicht als Korrektiv unvermeidlicher Fehlbarkeiten, sondern als ein unbedingtes Gegenprogramm, als Prinzip und Weg zu einer neuen Welt, zu einer Welt ohne Gegensätze, einer Welt, die also der Toleranz nicht mehr bedurfte. (= “Because tolerance was for the Enlightenment, the older and more successful it was, regarded not as a relative principle of balance, equilibrium and moderation, not as a corrective for unavoidable fallacies [[WHILST LEAVING SOCIAL-ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AS THEY WERE E.G. IN MONTESQUIEU’S DAY (LIBERALISM (WITH A MODERN STATE), BUT STILL WITH CERTAIN FEUDAL PRIVILEGES IN PLACE, ALBEIT BEYOND SOCIETAS CIVILS OF UP TO THE 15TH/16TH/17TH CENTURIES AT THE VERY LATEST)]], but as an unconditional counter-programme, as a principle and way to a new world, to a world without opposites [[= MORE JOO/ZIO MUMBO-JUMBO, HOCUS POCUS TALMUDIC ZIO-SUPREMACY NONSENSE THAT ONLY THE RETARDED OR THE ZIO-ALLIES WOULD EVER BELIEVE OR AT LEAST PROPAGATE]], a world which no longer needed tolerance [[AND SO THEY HOPE OR BRAIN WASH OTHERS INTO HOPING ... ]] ...
THEY’RE ALL FUCKED IN THE HEAD
THEY’RE ALL FUCKED IN THE HEAD
WHETHER ALIVE OR DEAD
IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
BECAUSE WHEN YOU LET THE JOO
GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATELY
DRIVE THE CHOO-CHOO
YOU MIGHT AS WELL JUMP OFF AT THE NEXT STATION
TO SEE IF YOU CAN SAVE SOMETHING OF YOUR NATION
IF IT HASN’T ALREADY BEEN MULTI-KULTI FUCKED UP
IRREDEEMABLY.
AND THAT’S THE WAY THE WEST WAS DONE
AS IF THE WEST BELONGED FROM THE BEGINNING UNDER THE
SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY MAMMON THUMB OF
JU-DAS (AGENT OF THE DEVIL).
BUT I SUPPOSE THE ENGLISH FOUL MAN CHOSE THAT PATH
AND AMERICAN MAN HAD NO BATH
TO CLEAN OFF OF HIMSELF THE FILTH.
BYE-BYE WEST, BYE-BYE!
WE CAN ALL NOW HAVE A BIT OF A CRY
AND I SHALL BE WISHING RUS MAN
(MY ORTHODOX BROTHER, THE BEST OF LUCK)
AND HAN MAN TO BE TOUGH
AND ALWAYS PROUD OF RACE, ANCESTORS, MYTHS, CULTURE,
HISTORY AND TERRITORY
THE ANCESTRAL TRIBAL HOMELANDS
AND NEVER BOW TO THE
ETERNAL EVIL-DEVIL MAMMON-LUCIFER HATE OF
SATAN).
GOOD LUCK TO AMERICAN MAN TOO!
YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE TO WORK OUT WHAT TO DO
WITH YOUR CHOO-CHOO
BECAUSE ITS GONNA CRASH INTO THE SIDE OF THE
MOUNTAIN
WITH SUCH FORCE
THERE’LL BE NO-ONE LEFT TO COME AROUND
WHEN YOU WITH MY TRIBE ARE TOO GONE.
(IN OTHER WORDS: YOU NEED TO GET YOUR JOOs UNDER
CONTROL ... SIMPLE, OBVIOUS MESSAGE ...
HISTORY REPEATEDLY TEACHES AS MUCH ...)
*
S. 180 The double nature of being the all-encompassing concept of unity and concept of struggle makes [[the concept of humanity (cum tolerance)]] until today, irresistible as bearing universality, but still being able to distinguish between For/Pro and Against/Con, Self and Foe.
S. 181 Humanitarian Propaganda views sceptical or pessimistic statements on people not in terms of facts and factual circumstances, but they are attacked as part of a deliberate misanthropic propaganda. [[THIS IS MORE ZIO-JOO-EXCREMENT AND FRIENDS IDEOLOGICAL-TALMUDIC OBFUSCATION OF REALITY IN ORDER TO CONCEAL THEIR “BEHIND THE SCENES” PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETY MACHINATIONS AND GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE FORMS OF POWER AND WEALTH ETC. ... THE REALITY IS, THOUGH, THERE IS “NO WAY OUT” ... ENGLISH AND AMERICAN “FOUL MEN” ARE ALL “LOCKED IN” TO THE LAW OF MAMMON AND HAN MAN AND OR APE MAN AND OR ANOTHER MAN ARE GEARING UP TO “MAKE TROUBLE” (I.E. GET THEIR “SLICE OF THE PIE” WHICH SATAN MAN AND FOUL MAN FRIEND DO NOT WANT TO GIVE UP) ... ]]
Humanitarianism + mass democracy + ontological optimism vs. man as problematic being with no history of Progress or Salvation, who is then viewed by DA JOO and Ally as a negator of the naturally given “meaning of life” ...
S. 181-182 »Diejenigen, die derart die existentiellen Grundlagen des gesellschaftlichen wie des individuellen Seins verleugnen, sind und waren immer eine gemiedene Minderheit. Aber ihre Auffassungen finden in Zeiten gesellschaftlicher Krisen bei aller Feindseligkeit eine gewisse Beachtung. Sind daraufhin Korrekturen oder gar Paradigmenwechsel die Folge, schließt sich der Kreis der großen Zuversicht wieder.« (“Those who in such a way deny the existential foundations of the societal as [[in the case]] of individual being/existence, are and always have been an avoided minority. [[NOTHING NEW, HERE FOLKS!!! LA METTRIE WAS ALMOST FULLY IGNORED IN HIS DAY, AS WAS ARISTIPPUS ET AL!!! (AND MACHIAVELLI AFTER DEATH HAS MOSTLY BEEN ANATHEMATISED AS THE DEVIL INCARNATE AND OR MISINTERPRETED) ...]] But their views and perceptions find in times of societal crises – despite all the hostility and antagonism, a certain attention. If, consequently, corrections or else paradigm shifts are the consequence, the circle of great confidence closes again.”)
182-183 In mass democracy, ideology takes on a moral form [[as opposed to e.g. the Class War to change social organisation to socialism ... in mass democracy, The JOO and Friends have ensured that “both sides” of the political spectrum are covered and that “both sides” end up at the same result: GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE JOOISH AND FRIENDS POWER AND WEALTH]] ... So, the mechanism of projection is fundamentally important as a self-fulfilling policy ... = decisive in producing the desired conformity ... [[IN OTHER WORDS, IF EVERYONE THOUGHT LIKE THE CRAZY MAN, NO-ONE WOULD MIGRATE AND EVERYONE WOULD LIVE IN A CLOSED SOCIETY WITH MINIMAL EXCHANGE TOWARDS THE OUTSIDE ... BUT REALITY DON’T WORK THAT WAY!!!!!]] ... And the power of communication = condition for success [[AND WE ALL KNOW WHICH SATANISTS AND ALLIES RUN THE WESTERN MASS MEDIA ETC.!!!]] ... in times of the mass and omnipresent effectiveness of the social and technical potential of the means of communication, ideology presumes a moral form ... and primarily a matter of mas media production ... and it could be that because of the mass-media saturation/domination, [[the FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISATION IS IMMUNE TO A THEORY-RELATED CRITIQUE OF IDEOLOGY ... THIS MEANS THAT IDEOLOGY SEEKING TO CHANGE SOCIETY FUNDAMENTALLY AWAY FROM JOOISH AND FRIENDS ZIO-CORPORATE AND BANKING/FINANCE PROFITS HAS NO ROOM “TO BREATHE”, SO TO SPEAK ... THAT’S WHY UNCLE JO REMAINS A BIT OF A HERO FOR ANYONE WITH POWER HUNGRY INSTINCTS, BECAUSE UNCLE JO DEALT WITH THAT EXCREMENT ... BUT, OF COURSE, WHAT HAPPENED ONCE IN HISTORY, DOES NOT HAPPEN AGAIN, BUT ONLY HAPPENS VERY DIFFERENTLY OR ... AS FARCE ... ]] ... of course, once circumstances shift away from continual growth/ZIO-profits and Konsum/Hedonismus ... other phenomena will appear ... so “the system” itself will have to adjust to certain realities ... as it’s trying to do now with Trump and Brexit etc. ...
S. 183-184 THIS IS ABSOLUTELY “ALL-TIME” CLASSIC FURTH HERE!!! MAKE SURE YOU STUDY THIS (AND NOT MY STUPID COMMENTS!!!) »Das mit Aufklärung und Revolution entstandene Herrschaftsproblem besteht in der Zähmung und Hegung von Massen, denen im Unterschied zum ancien régime politische Verantwortung zugesprochen wird, ohne daß sie wirkliche Verantwortung innehaben können. Dieses paradoxe Miteinander von zugemuteter und nicht zu leistender Verantwortung verlangt eine flexible Ideologie, in welcher Mobilmachung und Apathie, Engagement und Indolenz nebeneinander bestehen oder sich folgenlos abwechseln können. Die Massendemokratie bietet die bisher gelungenste Lösung dieser Aufgabenstellung, weil sie ambivalent strukturiert ist. Zum einen wird sie gesteuert durch eine Ideologie, die legitimiert, aber keine kontrollierende Rückwirkung auf die Politik hat. Indem sie an die Stelle objektiver Instanzen die freie Subjektivität des guten Willens setzt, autonomisiert sie die Politik. Und zum anderen steht sie unter dem Imperativ der Gleichheit und sorgt zugleich für deren Dämpfung, um den allfälligen Enttäuschungen vorzubeugen, mit dem Ergebnis, daß »gefühlte« Gleichheit und die soziale Anerkennung uneingeschränkter Akzeptanz sich gegenseitig bestätigen.«
“The problem of dominance/dominant authority coming into being with The Enlightenment and Revolution, consists in the taming, subduing and looking after, cultivating, tending to, maintaining, protecting and nurturing of (the) masses, who, in contrast to the ancien régime [[of oligarchic bourgeois liberalism]], are accorded [[superficial, e.g. “voting”]] political responsibility without holding, occupying or possessing real responsibility [[CRAZY MAN SAYS: THIS TO ME MEANS THAT THE JOOS AND THEIR ALLIES (ULTIMATELY) RUN EVERYTHING (BANKING, CORPORATIONS, FINANCE, MASS MEDIA/ENTERTAINMENT, “ACADEMIA AND THE ACADEMY” ETC. ETC. ETC.), THOUGH THEY HAVE TO KEEP AN EYE ON HOW THE MASSES “FEEL” OR ARE “RESPONDING”, AND THAT’S WHY YOU GET TRUMP OR BREXIT OR SALVINI POPPING UP TO TRY AND PUT SOME ORDER IN AMONGST THE APE-ANOMIC-SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY CHAOS ... ]]. This paradoxical being with one another (i.e. co-existence) of expected and not-to-be-achieved/accomplished and performed responsibility requires and demands a flexible ideology in which mobilisation and apathy, engagement and indolence exist next to one-another (i.e. co-exist), or can alternate without consequence [[i.e. the actual relations of GROSSLY DISPROPORTIONATE POWER AND WEALTH ACCUMULATION ARE NOT TOUCHED]]. Mass democracy offers the hitherto most successful solution to this setting of tasks, because it is structured ambivalently. For one thing, it is steered, controlled and driven by an ideology which legitimises [[politics]], but has no controlling retrospective effect on politics. By putting in the place of objective authorities (or tiers of jurisdiction), the free subjectivity of good will, it autonomises politics [[i.e. politics occurs as a kind of “virtual reality” theatre by two or three (usually) main political parties of government which serve Mammon, Ju-Das and Allies (= banking, finance, corporate, mass media/entertainment, legal, academic and other elites)]]. On the other hand, it stands under the imperative of equality and at the same time takes care of, looks after and ensures its (i.e. the imperative of equality’s) dampening and attenuation, in order to prevent possibly occurring disappointments, disillusionment(s) or disenchantment(s), with the result that “felt” equality and the social recognition of unrestricted and unlimited acceptance are mutually and reciprocally confirmed (or confirm each other).”
S. 184-185-186 SORRY FOR THIS, BUT I CAN’T HELP BUT QUOTING ALL OF THIS ... THERE IS MORE “OH MY GOD” STUFF HERE ... I SURE DO WANT TO SHAKE THE MAN’S HAND IN AFTER DEATH LAND !!!
»Aber das Problem, das den Bestand der Massendemokratie gefährdet, liegt woanders. Programmatisch obliegt ihr die Ächtung aller Ausgrenzungen und Distanzvorbehalte. Die Aufgabenstellung kommt dabei aus der globalen Dynamik der kapitalistischen Produktionsweise. Sie verlangt den ubiquitären Abbau aller Instanzen, die den Vorrang des Massenkonsums einschränken können. Der Politischen Korrektheit kommt dabei die Aufgabe zu, Konsumzugänge zu entgrenzen, Käuferrollen zu enthierarchisieren, Akzeptanzschwellen abzubauen, überhaupt für die Verschmelzung von Konsum und idealen Selbstwertgefühlen zu sorgen. Das ist funktional für die Öffnung kapitalistischer Räume. Das ist aber auch ein Prozeß, der Widerstand hervorruft und in dem die hedonistischen Massen des Westens auf Massen in einem anderen Aggregatzustand treffen mit einem ungewissen Ausgang. Geht aus diesem Zusammentreffen der Massen die westliche Massendemokratie als die dominierende Form der globalen Entwicklung hervor? Möglicherweise aber nehmen, falls die ökonomische Konstitution der Massendemokratie durch eine der Krisen des Kapitalismus in Gefahr käme, die gezähmten Massen der Massendemokratie wieder ihre klassische Gestalt an.
Dessenungeachtet treten die Massen der nachdrängenden Länder und Staaten in ihrer klassischen Gestalt auf, als Versammlungs- und Auflaufmassen. Das heißt, im Konfliktfall stehen sich »Entladungsmassen« und die »Unterhaltungsmassen« (Peter Sloterdijk) der Massendemokratie gegenüber. Genaugenommen stehen sie sich im Sinne einer persönlichen Konfrontation gar nicht gegenüber. Dafür sind ihre Lebensformen trotz aller Globalisierung zu verschieden. Das wird besonders im Kriegsfall deutlich. Dann sind nämlich die Massen von Ländern aus der Dritten Welt aktiv betroffen, sei es als direkt an der Kriegsführung Beteiligte, sei es als die von Kollateralschäden betroffene Zivilbevölkerung. Die Massen der Massendemokratie dagegen werden in ihrer physischen Existenz vom Krieg so gut wie gar nicht bedroht; in ihrer geistigseelischen Existenz ist der Krieg für sie ein mediales Ereignis. Wenn bei dessen Wahrnehmung Patriotismus noch eine Rolle spielt, dann in einem gewissen sportlichen Sinn, ein Patriotismus, der ohne die Frage nach Tod oder Leben auskommt. Dementsprechend rekrutieren sich die Armeen auf Seiten der Massendemokratie nicht mehr nach Maßgabe einer allgemeinen Wehrpflicht, sondern sind Berufsarmeen. Das und die hochüberlegene Feuerkraft versetzen die massendemokratischen Massen in die privilegierte Lage, Krieg und Frieden zugleich zu haben, in einem Zuschauer bei der Kriegführung und in der ungestörten Ruhe des eigenen Lebensvollzuges zu sein. Diese Ruhe wird allerdings ab und zu unterbrochen durch die Angst, Opfer eines terroristischen Anschlags zu werden, wobei die Angst vor dem Terrorismus, dem unheimlichen, vielgestaltigen Feind der Massendemokratie, von den Massenmedien und der Politik wachgehalten wird, weil sie als Sicherheitsbedürfnis geeignet ist, die leergewordene Stelle des Patriotismus zu besetzen.« (= “But the problem, which endangers the existence of mass democracy, lies somewhere else. Programmatically, incumbent on mass democracy is the (“outlawing” or) ostracism of all exclusions and reservations as to distance [[i.e. everything is in the range of being “mixed-in”]]. The setting of tasks comes – in the process – from the global dynamics of the capitalistic mode of production. It (the capitalistic mode of production) demands the ubiquitous dismantling of all authorities (or tiers of jurisdiction), which can restrict or limit the primacy of mass consumption. The task for Political Correctness, in the course of this, is to de-border (i.e. open up the borders of) access to consumption (i.e. consumer access), to de-hierarchise buyers’ roles, to reduce or downgrade thresholds of acceptance [[of the crap which is sold]], and to ensure the fusion of consumption and ideal self-esteem. That is functional for the opening up of capitalistic spaces. That is, however, also a process which brings into being resistance, and in which the hedonistic masses of the West encounter masses in a different state (of affairs in respect) of aggregation (i.e. being a mass), with an uncertain outcome. Does this encounter, gathering or coming together of masses make Western mass democracy emerge as the dominating/dominant form of global development? Perhaps, however, if the economic constitution of mass democracy were endangered by one of the crises of capitalism, the tamed masses of mass democracy would take again (or regain) their classical form [[I doubt this very much ... though it’s possible ... but we may never ever find out ... ]].
Regardless of this, the masses of the countries and states ensuing [[from massification]] in their classical form and shape, arise, act (or occur) as masses of meeting, gathering or assembly and masses of the crowd, tumult or commotion (or even (the) riot). That means, in the case of conflict, “masses of unloading, discharge, release or eruption” [[= masses of the crowd, tumult or commotion (or even (the) riot)]] and “masses of entertainment or diversion” [[masses of meeting, gathering or assembly]] (Peter Sloterdijk) face mass democracy. Strictly speaking, they are not at all opposed to one another in the sense of a personal confrontation. For that, their forms of life – despite all globalisation – are too different. This becomes especially clear in case of war. Then, namely, the masses of Third World countries are actively affected, either as participating directly in the waging or conducting of war, or as the civilian population (i.e. civilians) affected by collateral damage. The masses of mass democracy, on the other hand, are as good as not at all threatened in their physical existence by war; in their intellectual-spiritual-mental-psychic-emotional existence, war for them is a media event. If in the perception of theirs (i.e. of the masses of Western mass democracies), patriotism still plays a role, then in a certain sporting sense, [[it is]] a patriotism which does without the question of death or life. Accordingly, the armies on the side/part of mass democracy are no longer recruited in accordance with a general conscription, but are professional armies (vocational-career armies; armies of a calling). That and the highly superior firepower puts/moves/transfers the mass-democratic masses into the privileged situation or position of having war and peace at the same time, by being in an audience (spectating crowd) during the conduct and waging of war, and in the undisturbed peace and quiet of their own execution, carrying out, performance (i.e. course) of life. This calmness, though, is now and then (on and off, from time to time) interrupted by the angst or fear of becoming the victim of a terrorist attack, whereby the angst or fear before terrorism, the creepy, eerie, weird, spooky multi-faceted foe of mass democracy, is kept alive (and awake) by the mass media and politics because it (i.e. the said angst or fear of becoming a terrorism victim) is suitable as a security need, by occupying the having-become-vacant place of patriotism (i.e. the place of patriotism, which in the meanwhile has become vacant.”)
LOOK ... THIS AND THE “MASS MEDIA” ESSAY ARE “ESSAY OF THE CENTURY” STUFF AND THE REST OF THIS IS ABSOLUTELY MIND-BLOWING LIKE THE PREVIOUS PASSAGES ... SO WE’RE DOING COMPLETE TRANSLATIONS UNTIL THE END (ANOTHER FIVE OR SO (SHORT) PAGES) ... YOU ARE VERY LUCKY TO BE READING THIS (IF YOU EXIST) ... FREE OF CHARGE, OF COURSE ...
S. 186-187 »Der alte herrschaftliche Zusammenhang von Schutz und Gehorsam gilt also auch noch für die Massendemokratie. Das zeigt sich daran, wie leicht die auf ihren Individualismus bedachten Massen durch die Politische Korrektheit gleichzuschalten sind. Auf den ersten Blick ist die Herrschaftsform der Massendemokratie nur schwer zu fassen. Staatliche Autoritäten und gesellschaftlichen Interessen kommen weithin überein. Es handelt sich um eine Herrschaftsform, in der vormals entgegengesetzte Kräfte gleichgeschaltet sind. Sie hat eine paradoxe Gestalt, insofern sie sich auf ein und derselben Ebene abspielt, nämlich als Massenhedonismus unter der Bedingung eines disziplinären Konformismus. Aber was für ein geistiges Klima herrscht in dieser scheinbaren Anarchie? Eine Antwort darauf gibt uns eine spekulative Fortführung der Hegelsehen Dialektik von »Herr und Knecht«.« (= “The old manorial-masterly/lordly [[with feudal/Oikos roots]] interrelation between protection and obedience still therefore applies to, and is valid for, mass democracy. This is shown in the fact of how easy it is to force into line the masses, who are intent on and concerned about their individualism, through political correctness. At first glance, the form of rule (dominance and dominant authority) of mass democracy is only difficult to grasp. State authorities and societal interests widely agree. It is a matter of a form of rule/ruling (dominance or dominant authority), in which previously opposing forces are brought into line (and synchronised). It (i.e. this form of ruling/dominance/dominant authority) has a paradoxical form, in so far as it takes place and is acted out at one and the same level, namely, as mass-hedonism under the condition of a disciplinary conformism. But what for an intellectual-spiritual climate dominates, rules and prevails in this apparent anarchy? A speculative continuation of the Hegelian dialectic of “master and servant” gives an answer to that.”)
S. 187-188 »Im Verhältnis von Herr und Knecht traten, nach dem agonalen Kampf um Anerkennung, angstfreier Genuß und die Arbeit in der Furcht des Herrn als zwei Selbstbewußtseine sich selbständig gegenüber. Damit aber war der Kampf nicht beendet. Er ging als 220 Jahre Revolutionsgeschichte, die schließlich in den Weltbürgerkrieg einmündete, weiter. In diesem Ringen wollte der Knecht auch den angstfreien Genuß für sich gewinnen. In der Arbeit für den Herrn hatte er eine starke Position gewonnen. Er gewann die Kraft der Bildung für sich als die Kompetenz über das formierende Tun. Damit lag auch der Anspruch nahe, daß ihm auch das Recht auf den Genuß zustehe. Dieser Kampf war erfolgreich, jedoch blieb der Knecht dem Leben verhaftet und damit der Angst um das Leben.« (“In the relationship of master and servant, after the agonal struggle for recognition, angstless and fearless (anxiety-free) pleasure, enjoyment and work occurred in fear of the master as two self-consciousnesses independently of each other [[i.e. one of no fear (and being at ease), and one of fear (e.g. of “getting punished/sacked” etc.). But with that, the struggle was not ended. It went on as 220-year history of revolution, which finally flowed into and ended up in the world civil war [[Is Furth being mischievous here, deliberately ambiguous? Most likely the 220 years = 1789-1989+20? (with 2009 being the start of a major Historical Turn, or simply, he is referring to a rough figure of 220 years up to 2012, when he wrote this essay (The Thermidor took place in 1794))? ... or perhaps: 1688-1908/WW1 or 1648-1848+20? or 1848-2068 as a “prediction” for the Future???]]. In this wrestling (i.e. fierce struggle), the servant also wanted to win/gain angst/anxiety-free or fear-free (free-of-fear) enjoyment and pleasure for himself. In the/his work/labour for the/his master, he had gained/won a strong position. He gained/won the force/strength/power of education (cultivation, learning) for himself as a competency regarding forming/formative doing/acts/activity [[e.g. proletarians and other labourers of a rural/peasant background talking about the value of their children (in a foreign country) “getting educated and becoming a Man/Human/Person”]]. With that, the claim suggested itself that he was up for the right to pleasure and enjoyment (i.e. he, the educated (wage/salaried) worker, was entitled to pleasure/enjoyment too) [[8-hour working day, Sunday off, penalty rates etc. ... but the JOO and Friends of course have “turned this upside down again” ...]]. This struggle was successful, however, the servant remained strongly, bindingly attached to life, and with that, to the angst and fear regarding life.”)
S. 188 »Der frei und furchtlos genießende Herr wurde in diesem Krieg der permanenten Revolution vernichtet. Zwar war er frei von Furcht, jedoch inkompetent. Diese Inkompetenz kostete den Herrn trotz seiner Furchtlosigkeit die Existenz. Es gibt nicht nur eine List der Arbeit, sondern auch eine List des Kampfes. Und die in der Arbeit geschulte List des Knechtes siegte über die Todesverachtung des Herrn. Mit diesem Sieg gewann der Knecht auch den Genuß für sich. Jedoch der Knecht blieb der Knecht. Er gewann zwar den Genuß für sich, jedoch nicht, wie von den Revolutionären erhofft, auch die Freiheit des Herrn. Der Knecht bleibt dem Leben verhaftet und damit der Angst. Mit dem Herrn ist auch die Angstfreiheit untergegangen. Das Resultat ist nicht die Gesellschaft der Freien, sondern eine Gesellschaft der Angst und der Sorge, die Massendemokratie. Unbezähmbar bleibt jedoch der Wunsch nach der Freiheit des Herrn. Dieser Wunsch lebt sich aus im Massenindividualismus, im Privileg für alle, unübersehbar im Kult des Automobils. Die Freiheit des Automobils ist ein knechtischer Abglanz der Freiheit des Herrn.« (“The free and fearless taking-pleasure-and-enjoying-himself master was annihilated in this war of permanent revolution. Indeed, he was free of fear, yet [[he was also]] incompetent. This incompetence cost the master, despite his fearlessness, [[his]] existence. There is not only a cunning, guile, ruse, stratagem, subterfuge, trick, ploy of work, but also a cunning, guile, ruse, stratagem, subterfuge, trick, ploy of struggle. And the cunning etc. of the servant trained in work/labour triumphed over the defiance, disdain, scorn of the master in respect of death [[e.g. of the servant’s death as a labourer, if I’m interpreting this right]]. With this victory, the servant also gained/won pleasure and enjoyment for himself. However, the servant remained the servant. He won/gained pleasure and enjoyment for himself, however not, as the revolutionaries had hoped, freedom from the master, too. The servant remains strongly, bindingly attached to life, and with that, to angst and fear. Freedom from angst and fear has – with the master – declined (come to an end, perished or been destroyed [[in terms of the previous “rawer” power relations of attachment in oligarchic bourgeois liberal society and esp. societas civilis]]). The result is not a society of the free, but a society of angst, fear and worry, concern, care, anxiety, [[i.e.]] mass democracy. The wish, however, for freedom from the master remains irrepressible, indomitable and untamable. This wish lives on and survives in mass individualism, in the privilege for/of everyone, glaringly in the cult of the automobile. The freedom of the automobile is a servile reflection of the freedom of the master.”)
S. 189-190 »Den Unterschied zwischen Herrschaft und Disziplin macht der Mut. Disziplin ist die Art und Weise, wie Feiglinge die Macht ausüben. Herrschaft war die Machtausübung der Mutigen. Dieser Mut zur Herrschaft ist mit dem Herrn untergegangen. Disziplin ist indirekte Machtausübung, eine Macht, die nicht greifbar ist, die sich versteckt. Sennett beschreibt diese Machtstrategie der Manager. Die listige Feigheit, also die Macht des ängstlichen Knechtes, ist das Gemeinsame aller in der Massendemokratie. Die Massendemokratie ist Massendemokratie, da sie keine wirkliche Repräsentation kennt, sondern sich stattdessen an statistischen Quoten und Meinungsumfragen orientiert. Die Massendemokratie ist eine Gesellschaft der Gleichen, da Ungleichheit Mut erfordert und der Mut des Herrn mit ihm verlorenging. Die Massendemokratie ist bei all ihrem Auftrumpfen eine ängstliche Gesellschaft, man sieht es an ihrer Unfahigkeit zum Opfer im Kampf mit ihren Feinden.« (= “The difference between dominance/dominant authority, and, discipline boosts courage. Discipline is the way cowards [[“little (wo(e)-)men/dictators”]] exercise power. Dominance/dominant authority/ruling over others was the exercising of power of the courageous, brave and valiant. This courage for dominance/dominant authority and to rule (over others) has declined with the master. Discipline is the indirect exercising of power, a power which is not tangible and obvious, which hides itself. Sennett describes this power strategy/strategy of power of managers. Cunning, sly, crafty, foxy cowardice and pusillanimity, that is, the power of the fearful, angst-ridden servant, is the common ground of everyone in mass democracy. Mass democracy is mass democracy since it does not know of any real representation, but instead of that, is oriented towards statistical quotas and opinion polls, surveys [[= the way of the surreptitious, sly, primitive-secret-society and manipulative-Satanic-Mammon JOO and allies, ZIO-USA style]]. Mass democracy is a society of equals since inequality requires, demands courage, and the courage of the master was/got/became lost with it. Mass democracy is a fearful, angst-ridden society despite all its triumphal displays of superiority; one sees it (that) in its inability as regards sacrifice in the struggle with its foes [[= see comment above re: China]].”)
S. 190-191 »Daß Angst und Sorge das dominante Motiv der Massendemokratie ist, liegt offen zutage. Ein täglicher Blick in die Medien reicht. Alle Themen werden als Angstthemen behandelt. Die Palette der Ängste reicht von den politischen Ängsten (Angst um den Wohlstand, Angst um das Klima, Angst um die Stabilität der Demokratie, Angst vor Terrorismus usw.) über die Angst vor unsichtbaren Bedrohungen (Angst vor Viren, Angst vor Kernkraft, Angst vor Dioxin im Frühstücksei) bis zu den Ängsten des Alltags (Angst, im Dunkeln auf die Straße zu gehen, Angst vor Migranten vor der Haustür, Angst vor der Kreuzhacke in der Kellerdecke wie im Märchen von der klugen Else). Angst gibt es aktiv: Angst machen, und passiv: Angst haben. Angst haben gibt es wiederum als Angst haben vor und Angst haben um. Angst haben um kann man auch Sorge nennen. Alle diese Formen der Angst, in unendlicher Verschränkung, durchweben die Massendemokratie, wiederum in zweierlei Gestalt, als Angst der Massen und als Angst der Eliten. Angst machen von Seiten der Massen ist ein in 220 Jahren Revolution erprobtes Verfahren zur Durchsetzung von Interessen, von Seiten der Eliten ist es das Herrschaftsmittel der Disziplin. Dekliniert man alle diese Formen der Angst durch, ergibt diese Phänomenologie der Angst ein vollständiges Bild der Massendemokratie und ihrer medialen Selbstdarste llung.« (= “That angst, fear and worry, concern, care, anxiety is the dominant motive of mass democracy is obvious. A daily look at the media is enough/suffices. All topics, subjects and themes are handled and treated as anxiety issues (relating to angst and fear). The range/palette of fears/kinds of angst ranges from political fears/kinds of angst etc. (angst/fear regarding prosperity, angst/fear regarding the climate, angst/fear regarding the stability of democracy, angst/fear regarding terrorism, and so on, and so forth), about the angst/fear of invisible threats (angst/fear before/in the face of viruses, angst/fear before nuclear power, angst/fear before Dioxin in the breakfast egg [[HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]), up to the fears/kinds of angst of everyday life (angst/fear in respect of walking/going in(to) the dark on/in the street, fear/angst in respect of migrants at/before the/one’s front door, fear/angst in respect of the cross-hoe (i.e. the big hoe with two arms, one of which is provided with a point, the other with a cutting edge) in the cellar ceiling/basement as in the fairy tale of the Clever Else [[Grimm]] [[HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]). Angst and fear exist actively: to cause fear and angst, and passively: to have fear/angst. Having fear exists again as having fear/angst before/in the face of and having fear/angst about/around. One can also call having fear/angst about/around worry, concern, care, anxiety. All these forms of angst/fear, in infinite crossing/folding (over), entanglement, weave through mass democracy, again in two kinds of form/shape, as angst/fear in respect of the masses and as angst/fear of the elites. Causing angst/fear on the part of the masses is a – in a 220-year-long Revolution – proven, tried and tested process for the pushing through and asserting of interests, and on the part of the elites, it is the means of discipline pertaining to dominance and dominant authority/ruling over the masses. If one takes fully into account and goes through all these forms of angst and fear, this phenomenology of angst and fear yields a complete picture of mass democracy and its media-related self-portrayal (i.e. in mass democracy’s description of itself in the media.”)
S. 191 »Das ist die Lage. Aber wie geht es weiter? Die Technik sorgt weiter für den Fortschritt. Und: Gleich, in welchen Gestalten die sozialen Konflikte ablaufen, das gesellschaftliche Dasein der Menschen, welche Herrschaftsform es immer annimmt, dauert fort.« (= “That is the situation/position. But how does it continue/carry on/go further? Technology continues to take care of and ensure progress. And: no matter in which forms or shapes the social conflicts turn out (and take place), the societal/social being (t)here/existence of men, whatever form of rule, dominance or dominant authority it takes, always persists and continues (forth).”)
AND JUST BECAUSE ...
AND JUST BECAUSE
WE ARE DEFEATED
AND YOU HAVE WON
JU-DAS
AND YOU HAVE WON
SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY ...
AND JUST BECAUSE
VICTORY IS YOURS
THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOUR REIGN
WILL MAKE IT TO YEARS ONE THOUSAND.
YOUR GOOD RUN
PERHAPS AMOUNTS TO YEARS TWO HUNDRED
DEPENDING ON HOW YOU COUNT THE RUNS
AND YOUR SUPREMACY HAS BEEN REALLY SUPREME
FOR A NUMBER OF DECADES.
NOT AT ALL BAD
WHEN ASSESSED ON A POUND-FOR-POUND BASIS.
YOU’VE DONE AS PARASITE FLEA-VULTURE-LEECH-VOMIT CANCERS
VERY, VERY, WELL.
BUT JUST BECAUSE
YOU HAVE DONE COMPARATIVELY WELL
IT DOES NOT MEAN (OH NO IT DO NOT!)
THE WHEEL WON’T TURN.
AND ONCE IT (THE BIG WHEEL) TURNS
IT MIGHT TURN MUCH QUICKER THAN YOU THINK
OR
EXPECT.
*
[[ASSESSMENT: IF YOU’RE AVERAGE P.K. TEXT IS AN 11/10, THIS BOOK CONSTITUTES A 10/10 BOOK ON A 98 OR 99 OUT OF 100 BASIS]]
“On mass democracy (I)” = 2009; “Political Correctness” = 2008; “Mass Media” = 2012; “On mass democracy (II)” = 2012
*
[[CRAZY-MADMAN POLITICAL ANNOUNCEMENT: EVEN THOUGH I AM INSANE, AND DO NOT SUPPORT ANY KIND OF NORMATIVE/ POITICAL PROGRAMME WHATSOEVER, ... HAVING CONTEMPLATED THE LATE AND AT LEAST IN PART-GREAT PETER FURTH’S BOOK AS “REVIEWED” ON THIS PAGE, AND EVEN THOUGH PERSONALLY I WOULD BE IN FAVOUR OF AN ORTHODOX-GREEK-HELLENIC ROME CONNECTED TO ORTHODOX SERBIA AND RUSSIA (AS ONE UNITED ORTHODOX FIST AGAINST MAMMON AND SATAN AND ITS SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY OF JU-DAS-PROTESTANISM-PAPISM-ATHEISM-HOMOSEXUALISM-FEMMINOFAGGOTISM AND ALL-ROUND ZIO-PSYCHO-INSANITY CUM ZIO-COST APE/OTHER FREAKSHOW WORSHIP), ... WHICH SIMPLY AINT GOING TO HAPPEN ... ABSOLUTELY REALISTICALLY AND COLDLY, c. 2019 – AND I COULD BE WRONG – ... TRUMP AND BREXIT AND SALVINI AND ORBAN, THE POLISH GOVERNEMNT, ET AL. ...
(WITH A MEARSHEIMER, K. WALTZ, MORGENTHAU, G. KENNAN ET AL. THEORETICAL UNDERPINNING (AS POPULARISED BY BANNON AND FARAGE AND CO. (INCL. A LOT OF JOOS TOO, BECAUSE DA JOO ALWAYS COVERS ALL SIDES OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM IN CONDITIONS OF EXTREME SATANIC CIRCUS MONKEY MAMMONISATION-SATANISATION – YOU SIMPLY CAN’T GET OUT OF IT, INCLUDING ME AND MY WOMAN, AND EVERYONE ELSE IN “THE WEST” (NO MATTER HOW MUCH OR HOW LITTLE YOU BELIEVE IN THE SACRED AND HOLY DIVINITY OF THE VIRGIN MARY) ... ) ...
SEEM TO ME TO BE THE BEST OPTION FOR WHAT REMAINS OF THE WEST ... BECAUSE THE OTHER SIDE OF “ONE WORLD, GLOBAL VILLAGE” SATANISM IS TOO DEVIL-EVIL SATANIC TO COUNTENANCE AS A VIABLE OPTION (THEIR PATH LEADS TO CERTAIN NUCLEAR AND OR APE WIPE-OUT) ... WHEREAS THE “TRUMP SIDE” OFFERS THE ONLY HOPE FOR BALANCING THINGS (EVEN THOUGH I “FEEL” THAT HOPE IN GENERAL IS AT RATHER UP TO VERY LOW LEVELS OF HOPE ... ) ... THE WHITE NATIONALISTS/WHITE IDENTITARIANS ARE GENERALLY ON DOPE AND HEROIN – JUST LIKE THE TROTSKYISTS – ... THEIR PROGRAMMES ARE SO FAR REMOVED FROM REALISATION AND REALITY ITSELF THAT YOU MIGHT AS WELL BELIEVE THAT SMURFS ARE HUMANS ... AND AS FOR ME, I AM INSANE, BECAUSE YOU WOULD BE INSANE TOO IF YOU WERE UP-ROOTED, DE-ROOTED, DE-VILLAGISED, OTHERISED, ... AND YOUR PATRIA APE-FLOODED WITH YOUR PROGENITORI FORGOTTEN IN FAVOUR OF ZIO-EXCREMENT AND ZIO-COST-JU-DAS-APE/OTHER WORSHIP ... AND IF YOU HAD A HIGH LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSESS OF ALL OF THAT ... AND THERE WAS NO PATRIA LEFT TO DO A NOSTOS TO ... SO, I HOPE YOU ALL HAVE A NICE REMAINDER OF YOUR LIVES ... AND NOTHING TOO BAD HAPPENS TO ANYONE ...
GOOD LUCK, EVERYONE!!!]]
FOR THERE I SEE HIM ...
FOR THERE I SEE HIM
WHO?
MYSELF, IDIOT ...
FOR THERE I SEE HIM
(ME, DICKHEAD, AND SHUT THE FUCK UP, NO MORE
INTERRUPTING. I AM CREATING ART LIKE A JOO,
INSTANTANEOUSLY AND WITH NO MERIT)
FOR THERE I SEE HIM,
POINTING THE BONE
AT THOSE WHO REPRESENT
SATAN.
*
[[BY THE WAY: »Frank Böckelmann (* 25. Juli 1941 in Dresden) ist ein deutscher Autor, Medien- und Kulturwissenschaftler. ... Böckelmanns zentrale Positionen kennzeichnen auch die redaktionelle Linie des von ihm herausgegebenen politischen Magazins Tumult. Vierteljahresschrift für Konsensstörung. ... Böckelmann nahm am 15. Dezember 2014 an einer Demonstration der Bewegung Pegida in Dresden teil. Gegenüber einer Stern-Reporterin soll er sich wie folgt geäußert haben: „In Sachsen gibt es heute kaum Einwanderer. Aber in 50 bis 100 Jahren besteht die Gefahr einer Islamisierung Deutschlands. Ich möchte Widerstand dagegen leisten, dass sich Traditionen vermischen und keine Unterschiede mehr erkennbar sind. Die Politik macht Tür und Tor auf für alle, die reinwollen. Die Leute spüren, dass sie sich unter der Fahne versammeln müssen.“[27] ↑ Tilman Gerwien: Aufstand aus der Mitte. In: stern, Nr. 1/2015, 23. Dezember 2014, S. 130.« (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Böckelmann )
[[CRAZY MAN ADDS: DON’T WORRY FRANK!!! IF YOU HUN KRAUT TEUTONS WAKE UP BY THE END OF THIS CENTURY, YOU WILL BE BACK INTO FULL RACIAL-LIKE SWING TO HOOK UP WITH THE RUSSIANS (AND POLES) IN ORDER TO SURVIVE THE MUHUMUTS AND ALL APE MEN GOING APE BANANA JUNGLE APE, WHEREAS MY TRIBE IS ALREADY DEADER THAN DEAD ... AND YOUR COUNTRY HASN’T EXACTLY HELPED, THOUGH WE ARE ALWAYS TO BLAME FIRST AND ABOVE ALL ... ]]
AND
»Tumult. Vierteljahresschrift für Konsensstörung (Eigenschreibweise: TUMULT) ist eine 2013 gegründete Zeitschrift, herausgegeben von Frank Böckelmann
Eine Schriftenreihe unter dem Titel Tumult existiert seit 1979, derzeit wird sie vom Sonderzahl Verlag (Wien) fortgesetzt. Der Titel „Tumult“ benennt einen unbeabsichtigten, unwillkürlichen Aufruhr und spielt mit seiner zweiten Silbe auf das lateinische Wort für „viel“ bzw. „Vieles“ an. Er zieht gleichsam Bilanz: Unsere Lage offenbart sich als ungesteuertes Durcheinander, als Konfusion ohne Urheber. „Tumult“ distanziert sich vom Machbarkeitswahn: von der Hybris, dass man die Welt „erfinden“ und die eigene Identität nach Belieben „konstruieren“ könne. « (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumult._Vierteljahresschrift_für_Konsensstörung) ]]
VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE
AND IF ANYONE IS READING OUT THERE, DON’T FORGET THIS:
THERE IS NO FINAL SOLUTION.
IN FACT, THERE IS NO SOLUTION WHATSOEVER.
THERE IS JUST STRUGGLE AND GROUPS OF PEOPLE ENGAGED IN STRUGGLE (AS WELL AS ALL THE CO-OPERATION WHICH TAKES PLACE TOO, BECAUSE MOST OF THE TIME IN MOST CONCRETE SITUATIONS THERE IS PEACE, I.E. CO-OPERATION AND CONFLICT WITHOUT WAR), BUT IT’S THE WARS (AND OR CONFLICT WITH VIOLENCE) WHICH, INTER ALIA (AND LOOK, THERE IS A LOT OF “ALIA” TOO), PUSH THINGS ALONG IN HISTORY ...
THAT’S ALL THERE IS, ULTIMATELY, UNTIL AND WHEN NATURE REMOVES LIFE FROM MAN, OR MAN REMOVES LIFE FROM MAN.
AND DON’T FORGET THAT, DUMB FUCKING PEA-BRAINS
(FULL-SPECTRUM ZIO-LOBOTOMISED PSYCHO-ZOMBIES)
...
AND WHAT’S MORE, DICKHEADS, AND DON’T YOU FORGET IT, RETARDS, THERE WILL ALWAYS BE ELEMENTS OF EQUALITY AND INEQUALITY IN ANY SOCIETY, WHATEVER THE ACTUAL SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND THE DOMINANT IDEOLOGY ETC. ... DUMB FUCKING IMBECILES ...
[[FINAL NOTE: IF HELLAS CAN’T SURVIVE – AND IT CAN’T BECAUSE IT’S ALREADY DEAD – I DON’T GIVE A FUCK WHETHER PERSIA OR JUDEA OR ANYONE SURVIVES ... YOUZ CAN ALL GO AND GET FUCKED ... (THE FEELING IS MUTUAL) ... ]]
FINAL RE: BOOK ANNOUNCEMENT
PETER FURTH
WAS AND IS A
LEGEND.
THANK
YOU,
PETER!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCAb5ig90rA
( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9_m4KoTC6w
Karl Richter - Bach: Goldberg Variations (removed from YouTube, so find it yourselves, or try:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tUHMh87iro)